Abstract
The neighborhood effect averaging problem (NEAP) was discovered in 2018. It arises when human mobility is ignored when assessing individual exposures to environmental factors (e.g., noise and air pollution). Neighborhood effect averaging occurs because most people move around in their daily life, and as a result, their mobility-based exposures would tend toward the average of the population or participants of the study area. Assessments of individual exposures or their health impacts based only on residential neighborhoods do no capture people’s exposures in non-residential neighborhoods and thus may lead to erroneous findings (because people’s daily mobility may amplify or attenuate the exposures they experienced in their residential neighborhoods). To date, there has been limited research on the NEAP and its effects on research findings. This chapter provides a succinct overview of the NEAP and relevant recent studies on the problem. It also highlights the need to mitigate the NEAP in research and its policy implications, especially concerning the situations of socially disadvantaged groups.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Chen, X., & Kwan, M.-P. (2015). Contextual uncertainties, human mobility, and perceived food environment: The uncertain geographic context problem in food access research. American Journal of Public Health, 105(9), 1734–1737.
Dewulf, B., Neutens, T., Lefebvre, W., Seynaeve, G., Vanpoucke, C., Beckx, C., & van de Weghe, N. (2016). Dynamic assessment of exposure to air pollution using mobile phone data. International Journal of Health Geographics, 15, 14.
Fotheringham, A. S., & Wong, D. W. S. (1991). The modifiable areal unit problem in multivariate statistical analysis. Environment and Planning A, 23(7), 1025–1044.
Huang, J., & Kwan, M.-P. (2021). Uncertainties in the assessment of COVID-19 risk: A study of people’s exposure to high-risk environments using individual-level activity data. Annals of the American Association of Geographers (online).
Kim, J., & Kwan, M.-P. (2019). Beyond commuting: Ignoring individuals’ activity-travel patterns may lead to inaccurate assessments of their exposure to traffic congestion. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(1), 89.
Kim, J., & Kwan, M.-P. (2021a). Assessment of sociodemographic disparities in environmental exposure might be erroneous due to neighborhood effect averaging: Implications for environmental inequality research. Environment Research, 195, 110519.
Kim, J., & Kwan, M.-P. (2021b). How neighborhood effect averaging may affect assessment of individual exposures to air pollution: A study of ozone exposures in Los Angeles. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 111(1), 121–140.
Kwan, M.-P. (2009). From place-based to people-based exposure measures. Social Science and Medicine, 69(9), 1311–1313.
Kwan, M.-P. (2012a). How GIS can help address the uncertain geographic context problem in social science research. Annals of GIS, 18(4), 245–255.
Kwan, M.-P. (2012b). The uncertain geographic context problem. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102(5), 958–968.
Kwan, M.-P. (2013). Beyond space (as we knew it): Toward temporally integrated geographies of segregation, health, and accessibility. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 103(5), 1078–1086.
Kwan, M.-P. (2018a). The limits of the neighborhood effect: Contextual uncertainties in geographic, environmental health, and social science research. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 108(6), 1482–1490.
Kwan, M.-P. (2018b). The neighborhood effect averaging problem (NEAP): An elusive confounder of the neighborhood effect. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15, 1841.
Kwan, M.-P., Wan, J., Tyburski, M., Epstein, D. H., Kowalczyk, W. J., & Preston, K. L. (2019). Uncertainties in the geographic context of health behaviors: A study of substance users’ exposure to psychosocial stress using GPS data. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 33(6), 1176–1195.
Ma, X., Li, X., Kwan, M.-P., & Chai, Y. (2020). Who could not avoid exposure to high levels of residence-based pollution by daily mobility? Evidence of air pollution exposure from the perspective of the neighborhood effect averaging problem (NEAP). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(4), 1223.
Mu, L., & Wang, F. (2008). A scale-space clustering method: Mitigating the effect of Scale in the analysis of zone-based data. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 98(1), 85–101.
Park, Y. M., & Kwan, M.-P. (2017). Individual exposure estimates may be erroneous when spatiotemporal variability of air pollution and human mobility are ignored. Health & Place, 43, 85–94.
Shafran-Nathan, R., Yuval, Levy, I., & Broday, D. M. (2017). Exposure estimation errors to nitrogen oxides on a population scale due to daytime activity away from home. Science of the Total Environment, 580, 1401–1409.
Tan, Y., Kwan, M.-P., & Chen, Z. (2020). Examining ethnic exposure through the perspective of the neighborhood effect averaging problem: A case study of Xining, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17, 2872.
Yoo, E., Rudra, C., Glasgow, M., & Mu, L. (2015). Geospatial estimation of individual exposure to air pollutants: Moving from static monitoring to activity-based dynamic exposure assessment. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 105(5), 915–926.
Yu, H., Russell, A., Mulholland, J., & Huang, Z. (2018). Using cell phone location to assess misclassification errors in air pollution exposure estimation. Environmental Pollution, 233, 261–266.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Higher Education Press
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kwan, MP. (2022). Human Mobility and the Neighborhood Effect Averaging Problem (NEAP). In: Li, B., Shi, X., Zhu, AX., Wang, C., Lin, H. (eds) New Thinking in GIScience. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3816-0_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3816-0_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-3815-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-3816-0
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)