Abstract
Electricity plays a key role in the economic development of any region and in people’s quality of life. Its global demand is steadily growing, a trend that is expected to continue in the future. Power plants are usually assessed from technical and economic feasibility points of view. Nevertheless, both the resources of the planet and its capacity to withstand human-induced impacts are limited. Therefore, it is necessary to consider environmental and social criteria at the time of assessing the most important types of power plants. This is the only way to achieve a sustainable electricity sector. Consequently, in this chapter six different multi-criteria decision making methods (MCDM) are described and applied to assess the sustainability of renewable and non-renewable power systems throughout their life cycles, from cradle to grave. In particular, three criteria were considered: levelised cost of electricity (economic), direct job creation (social) and climate change potential including biogenic carbon (environmental). The results of all methods are presented and discussed in depth, adopting different approaches.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aguado A, Manga R, Ormazabal G (2006) Los aspectos conceptuales del proyecto Mives. In La medida de la Sostenibilidad en Edificacion Industrial, pp 113–134. Bilbao
Ahmad A, Ramana MV (2014) Too costly to matter: economics of nuclear power for Saudi Arabia. Energy 69:682–694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.03.064
Bachmann TM (2013) Towards life cycle sustainability assessment: drawing on the NEEDS project’s total cost and multi-criteria decision analysis ranking methods. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1698–1709. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0535-3
Backes JG, D’Amico A, Pauliks N, Guarino S, Traverso M, Lo Brano V (2021) Life cycle sustainability assessment of a dish-stirling concentrating solar power plant in the mediterranean area. Sustain Energy Technol Assess 47:101444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2021.101444
Bana e Costa CA, de Corte J-M, Vansnick J-C (2011) MACBETH (Measuring Attractiveness by a Categorical Based Evaluation Technique). In Wiley Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science. Hoboken: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470400531.eorms0970
Bana e Costa CA, Vansnick JC (1994) MACBETH—an interactive path towards the construction of cardinal value functions. Inter Trans Operat Res 1(4):489–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/0969-6016(94)90010-8
Begić F, Afgan NH (2007) Sustainability assessment tool for the decision making in selection of energy system-Bosnian case. Energy 32:1979–1985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2007.02.006
Behzadian M, Kazemzadeh RB, Albadvi A, Aghdasi M (2010) PROMETHEE: a comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications. Eur J Oper Res 200:198–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.021
Brans JP, Vincke P (1985) A preference ranking organisation method: (the PROMETHEE method for multiple criteria decision-making). Manage Sci 31(6):647–657. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.31.6.647
Brans J, Vincke P, Mareschal B (1986) How to select and how to rank projects: the promethee method. Eur J Oper Res 24(2):228–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(86)90044-5
Brundtland GH, Khalid M, Agnelli S, Al-Athel S, Chidzero B, Fadika L, … Shijun M (1987) Our Common Future. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford
Carral L, Camba Fabal C, Lamas Galdo MI, Rodríguez-Guerreiro MJ, Cartelle Barros JJ (2020) Assessment of the materials employed in green artificial reefs for the galician estuaries in terms of circular economy. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17:8850. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17238850
Cartelle Barros JJ, Lara Coira M, de la Cruz López MP, del Caño Gochi A (2016) Probabilistic life-cycle cost analysis for renewable and non-renewable power plants. Energy 112:774–787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.06.098
Cartelle Barros JJ, Lara Coira M, de la Cruz López MP, del Caño Gochi A (2017) Comparative analysis of direct employment generated by renewable and non-renewable power plants. Energy 139:542–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.08.025
Cartelle Barros JJ, Lara Coira M, de la Cruz López MP, del Caño Gochi A (2018) Sustainability optimisation of shell and tube heat exchanger, using a new integrated methodology. J Clean Prod 200:552–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.266
Cartelle Barros JJ, Lara Coira M, de la Cruz López MP, del Caño Gochi A, Soares I (2020a) Probabilistic multicriteria environmental assessment of power plants: a global approach. Appl Energy 260:114344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114344
Cartelle Barros JJ, Lara Coira M, de la Cruz MP, del Caño A, Soares I (2020b) Optimisation techniques for managing the project sustainability objective : application to a shell and tube heat exchanger. Sustainability 12:4480. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114480
Cartelle JJ, Lara M, de la Cruz MP, del Caño A (2015) Indicators for assessing sustainability of power plants: environmental, social, economic and technical aspects. In International Conference on Renewable Energies and Power Quality (ICREPQ’15), pp 139–144. A Coruña. https://doi.org/10.24084/repqj13.260
Churchman CW, Ackoff RL (1954) An approximate measure of value. J Operat Res Soc Am 2(2):172–187. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2.2.172
Cuadrado J, Zubizarreta M, Pelaz B, Marcos I (2015) Methodology to assess the environmental sustainability of timber structures. Constr Build Mater 86:149–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.109
Dai J, Li S, Bi J, Ma Z (2019) The health risk-benefit feasibility of nuclear power development. J Clean Prod 224:198–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.206
Danesh D, Ryan M, Abbasi A (2015) Using the analytic hierarchy process as a decision-making tool in project portfolio management. Intern J Econ Manag Eng 9(12):4194–4204. Retrieved from http://www.waset.org/publications/10003073
Danesh D, Ryan MJ, Abbasi A (2017) A systematic comparison of multi-criteria decision making methods for the improvement of project portfolio management in complex organisations. Int J Manag Decis Mak 16:280–319. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmdm.2017.10005690
De Brito MM, Evers M (2016) Multi-criteria decision-making for flood risk management: a survey of the current state of the art. Nat Hazard 16:1019–1033. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1019-2016
de la Cruz MP, Castro A, del Caño A, Gómez D, Lara M, Cartelle JJ (2014) Comprehensive methods for dealing with uncertainty in assessing sustainability part 1: the MIVES-monte carlo method. In García-Cascales MS, Sánchez-Lozano JM, Masegosa AD, Cruz-Corona C (eds) Soft Computing Applications for Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency, pp 69–106. Hershey: IGI Global
del Caño A, Gómez D, de la Cruz MP (2012) Uncertainty analysis in the sustainable design of concrete structures: a probabilistic method. Constr Build Mater 37:865–873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.020
del Caño A, Pilar de la Cruz M, Gómez D, Pérez M (2016) Fuzzy method for analysing uncertainty in the sustainable design of concrete structures. J Civ Eng Manag 22(7):924–935. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2014.928361
Dombi M, Kuti I, Balogh P (2014) Sustainability assessment of renewable power and heat generation technologies. Energy Policy 67:264–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.12.032
Fishburn PC (1967) Methods of estimating additive utilities. Manage Sci 13(7):435–453
Gómez D, del Caño A, de la Cruz MP, Josa A (2012) Evaluación de la sostenibilidad en estructuras de hormigón y metálicas. In: Aguado A (ed) Monografía ACHE: Sostenibilidad y construcción. Asociación Científico-Técnica del Hormigón (ACHE), Barcelona, pp 413–439
Govindan K, Jepsen MB (2016) ELECTRE: a comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications. Eur J Oper Res 250:1–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.07.019
Hacatoglu K, Dincer I, Rosen MA (2015) A new model to assess the environmental impact and sustainability of energy systems. J Clean Prod 103:211–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.050
Hadiyanto D, Purwanto YA, Noorachmat BP, Sapei A (2019) An indicator and evaluation criteria for off-grid micro-hydro power sustainability assessment. Intern J Renew Energy Res 9(3):1–14
Hajkowicz S, Collins K (2007) A review of multiple criteria analysis for water resource planning and management. Water Resour Manage 21:1553–1566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-006-9112-5
Han CH (2004) Tools for establishing dominance with linear partial information and attribute hierarchy. Int J Syst Sci 35(2):123–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207720410001671714
Ho W, Xu X, Dey PK (2010) Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review. Eur J Oper Res 202:16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.05.009
Hwang C-L, Yoon K (1981) Multiple attribute decision making methods and applications: a state-of-the-art survey. Lecture Notes Ii Economics and Mathematical Systems (1st ed.). Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9
Josa I, de la Fuente A, Casanovas-Rubio M del M, Armengou J, Aguado A (2021) Sustainability-oriented model to decide on concrete pipeline reinforcement. Sustainability, 13:3026. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063026
Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1993) Decisions with multiple objectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Klee AJ (1971) The role of decision models in the evaluation of competing environmental health alternatives. Manag Sci 18(2):B52–B67. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.18.2.B52
Liu B, Yang Z, Chen Y, Li L, Chen S (2021) A decision-making framework for scheme selection for sustainable hydropower development. Int J Green Energy 18:951–965. https://doi.org/10.1080/15435075.2021.1890081
López-González A, Ferrer-Martí L, Domenech B (2019) Long-term sustainability assessment of micro-hydro projects: case studies from Venezuela. Energy Policy 131:120–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.04.030
Markandya A, Arto I, González-Eguino M, Román MV (2016) Towards a green energy economy? Tracking the employment effects of low-carbon technologies in the European Union. Appl Energy 179:1342–1350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.02.122
Meade LM, Presley A (2002) R&D project selection using the analytic network process. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 49(1):59–66. https://doi.org/10.1109/17.985748
Mohamed U, Zhao Y, Huang Y, Cui Y, Shi L, Li C, … Nimmo W (2020) Sustainability evaluation of biomass direct gasification using chemical looping technology for power generation with and w/o CO2 capture. Energy 205:117904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117904
Mu Y, Cai W, Evans S, Wang C, Roland-Holst D (2018) Employment impacts of renewable energy policies in China: A decomposition analysis based on a CGE modeling framework. Appl Energy 210:256–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.10.086
Nagarkatti A, Kolar AK (2021) Advanced coal technologies for sustainable power sector in India. Electr J 34:106970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tej.2021.106970
Noryani M, Sapuan SM, Mastura MT (2018) Multi-criteria decision-making tools for material selection of natural fibre composites: a review. J Mechan Eng Sci 12(1):3330–3353. https://doi.org/10.15282/jmes.12.1.2018.5.0299
Opricovic S (1998) Multicriteria optimization of civil engineering systems. University of Belgrade, Faculty of Civil Engineering
Opricovic S, Tzeng G-H (2007) Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods. Eur J Oper Res 178:514–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.01.020
Opricovic S, Tzeng GH (2004) Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. Eur J Oper Res 156:445–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1
Pastijn H, Leysen J (1989) Constructing an outranking relation with ORESTE. Math Comput Model 12:1255–1268. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-7177(89)90367-1
Penadés-Plà V, García-Segura T, Martí JV, Yepes V (2016) A review of multi-criteria decision-making methods applied to the sustainable bridge design. Sustainability (switzerland) 8:1295. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8121295
Romero C, Tamiz M, Jones DF (1998) Goal programming, compromise programming and reference point method formulations: linkages and utility interpretations. J Operat Res Soc 49(9):986–991. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600611
Roubens M (1982) Preference relations on actions and criteria in multicriteria decision making. Eur J Oper Res 10(1):51–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(82)90131-X
Roy B (1968) Classement et choix en présence de points de vue multiples. Revue Française D’automatique, D’informatique Et De Recherche Opérationnelle 8:57–75
Saaty TL (1980) The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw Hill, New York
Saaty TL (1990) How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 48:9–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I
Saaty TL, Vargas LG (2006) Decision making with the analytic network process (1st ed.). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-33987-6
San-José JT, Losada R, Cuadrado J, Garrucho I (2007) Approach to the quantification of the sustainable value in industrial buildings. Build Environ 42(11):3916–3923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.11.013
Sánchez-Garrido AJ, Navarro IJ, Yepes V (2021) Neutrosophic multi-criteria evaluation of sustainable alternatives for the structure of single-family homes. Environ Impact Assess Rev 89:106572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106572
Sarin RK (2013) Multi-attribute utility theory. In SI Gass, MC Fu (eds) Encyclopedia of operations research and management science, pp 1004–1006. Boston, MA: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1153-7_644
Sedghiyan D, Ashouri A, Maftouni N, Xiong Q, Rezaee E, Sadeghi S (2021) Prioritization of renewable energy resources in five climate zones in Iran using AHP, hybrid AHP-TOPSIS and AHP-SAW methods. Sustain Energy Technol Assess 44:101045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2021.101045
Shaaban M, Scheffran J (2017) Selection of sustainable development indicators for the assessment of electricity production in Egypt. Sustainable Energy Technol Assess 22:65–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2017.07.003
Shaaban M, Scheffran J, Böhner J, Elsobki MS (2018) Sustainability assessment of electricity generation technologies in Egypt using multi-criteria decision analysis. Energies 11:1117. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11051117
Siksnelyte-Butkiene I, Streimikiene D, Balezentis T, Skulskis V (2021) A systematic literature review of multi-criteria decision-making methods for sustainable selection of insulation materials in buildings. Sustainability 13:737. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020737
Siksnelyte-Butkiene I, Zavadskas EK, Streimikiene D (2020) Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) for the assessment of renewable energy technologies in a household: a review. Energies 13:1164. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13051164
Stougie L, Giustozzi N, van der Kooi H, Stoppato A (2018) Environmental, economic and exergetic sustainability assessment of power generation from fossil and renewable energy sources. Int J Energy Res 42:2916–2926. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.4037
Tourkolias C, Mirasgedis S, Damigos D, Diakoulaki D (2009) Employment benefits of electricity generation: a comparative assessment of lignite and natural gas power plants in Greece. Energy Policy 37(10):4155–4166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.05.015
Tzeng G-H, Huang J-J (2011) Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications, vol 148. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida
Uji A, Prakash A, Song J (2021) Does the “NIMBY syndrome” undermine public support for nuclear power in Japan? Energy Policy 148:111944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111944
Wu D, Yang Z, Wang N, Li C, Yang Y (2018) An integrated multi-criteria decision making model and AHP weighting uncertainty analysis for sustainability assessment of coal-fired power units. Sustainability 10:1700. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061700
Wu H, Huang L, Yuan L, Wang DW, Wang S (2021) Young Chinese people’s perceptions of nuclear power: connection with enthusiasm for information, perceptions of nuclear reactor technology and NIMBY. Prog Nucl Energy 141:103964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2021.103964
Zavadskas EK, Kaklauskas A, Banaitis A, Kvederyte N (2004) Housing credit access model: the case for Lithuania. Eur J Oper Res 155:335–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00091-2
Zavadskas EK, Kaklauskas A, Šarka V (1994) The new method of multicriteria complex proportional assessment of projects. Technol Econ Dev Econ 1(3):131–139
Zheng G, Wang X (2020) The comprehensive evaluation of renewable energy system schemes in tourist resorts based on VIKOR method. Energy 193:116676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.116676
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Barros, J.J.C., Filgueira-Vizoso, A., Castro-Santos, L., Galdo, M.I.L. (2022). Sustainability Evaluation of Power Systems Using MCDM Techniques. In: Khan, S.A.R., Panait, M., Puime Guillen, F., Raimi, L. (eds) Energy Transition. Industrial Ecology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3540-4_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3540-4_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-3539-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-3540-4
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)