Abstract
In law schools, argumentation exercises [Adachi 84, Kitamura 95, Iida 06, Iwata 07, Fukuzawa 10] for acquiring argumentation skills and case studies [Nitta 97] for teaching precedents occupy a large weight, and legal education that integrates argumentation skills and precedent analysis is important.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Y. Adachi, Logic of Argumentation - Democracy and Argumentation (Mokutakusha, Tokyo, 1984)
K. Fukuzawa, Rules of Argument (NHK Publishing, Tokyo, 2010)
H. Hirata, AI-Based Dispute Resolution Support: Legal Artificial Intelligence (Seibundo, Tokyo, 2018)
Y. Iida, Bad Argument: Detecting with Logical Thinking (Chikuma Shobo, Tokyo, 2006)
The Intercollegiate Negotiation Competition, http://www.negocom.jp/
T. Inohara, T. Imada, K. Eto, H. Kaneko, K. Kijima, T. Kuwako, T. Sakano, M. Naito, T. Nakai, K. Nitta, Y. Harashina, M. Matsumoto, K. Yoshitake, Consensus Formation Theory (Keiso Shobo, Tokyo, 2011)
M. Iwata, Rulebook of Argumentation (Shincho Shinsho, Tokyo, 2007), pp. 18–19
A. Kakuta, A support tool for legal education. J. Artif. Intell. 23(4), 505–512 (2008)
H. Kitamura, Introduction to the Art of Debate: From Problem Finding and Logic Building to Crisis Management (Goma Shobo, Tokyo, 1995)
T. Kotani, K. Seki, T. Matsui, T. Okamoto, Development of an argument support system incorporating favorable comment influence. J. Artif. Intell. 19(2 SP-A), 85–104 (2004)
H. Mogi, Business Debate (Nihon Keizai Shimbun, Tokyo, 2010)
M. Muramatsu, Y. Yasumura, K. Nitta, A tool for tagging logical structure of judgments, in IEICE Workshop Materials, vol. KBSE2001-49, 2002
K. Nitta, Legal reasoning system HELIC-II. IPSJ J. 35(6), 986–996 (1994)
K. Nitta, The Role of Judicial Precedents in Legal Argumentation (The Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence, Research Group on Foundations of Artificial Intelligence, 1997)
K. Nitta, M. Shibasaki, S. Yasumura, R. Hasegawa, H. Fujita, M. Koshimura, K. Inoue, Y. Shirai, H. Komatsu, A legal argument support system based on diagrams. J. Artif. Intell. 17(1), 32–43 (2002)
S. Noya, New Edition of Logic Training (Sangyo Shobo, Tokyo, 2006)
T. Osawa, Legal Dialogue Theory: Aiming to Be a "Specialist in Law and Dialogue" (Shinzansha, Tokyo, 2004)
G. Struck, Topische Jurisprudenz: Argument und Gemeinplatz in der juristischen Arbeit (Athenäum, Frankfurt, 1971)
J. Winslade, G. Monk (translated by K. Kunishige and B. Murasaki), Narrative Mediation: New Approaches to Mediation, Arbitration, and Conflict Resolution (Kitaoji Shobo, Kyoto, 2010)
I. Yoshida, An Attempt at Dialogue-Promoting Mediation Theory (Kumamoto University Law Review 11) (Seibundo, Tokyo, 2011)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hirata, H., Nitta, K. (2022). Introduction. In: Analysis of Legal Argumentation Documents. Translational Systems Sciences, vol 29. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2928-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2928-1_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-2927-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-2928-1
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)