Skip to main content

Assessing Integrated TOPSIS Model with Exponential Intuitionistic Entropy Measure: A Case Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Enabling Industry 4.0 through Advances in Manufacturing and Materials

Abstract

Solving multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problems requires assigning weights to the problem’s criteria, the determination of criteria weights could be subjectively or objectively. Many studies emphasized the effectiveness of using objective techniques to derive criteria weights, like using entropy as a measure of fuzziness of the fuzzy sets to detect criteria weights. Despite that, still this subject under study and debate between researchers. This is due to the importance and effect of the criteria weights on the final results. The proposed MCDM method integrates the TOPSIS approach with the intuitionistic fuzzy entropy measure in exponential form, aiming to have an MCDM method that is simple to be implemented and compensate the need to determining the criteria weights. In this paper, the process of the new MCDM method is introduced, with two practical examples to demonstrate the simplicity of the proposed method, and to prove its effectiveness without the need to determine the attribute weights. At the end of each example, a comparison table is provided to benchmark the generated result from the new method with the results from other comparable methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Brunelli M (2015) Introduction to the analytic hierarchy process. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  2. Khan BM, Bilal R, Young R (2018) Fuzzy-TOPSIS based Cluster Head selection in mobile wireless sensor networks. J Electr Syst Inf Technol 5(3)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Eslaminasab Z, Hamzehee A (2019) Determining appropriate weight for criteria in multi criteria group decision making problems using an LP model and similarity measure

    Google Scholar 

  4. Aikhuele DO, Turan FBM (2016) Intuitionistic fuzzy-based model for failure detection. Springerplus 5(1):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Garg H (2017) Generalized intuitionistic fuzzy entropy-based approach for solving multi-attribute decision-making problems with unknown attribute weights

    Google Scholar 

  6. Arian H, Ashkan H, Huchang L, Francisco H (2019) An overview of MULTIMOORA for multi-criteria decision-making: theory, developments, applications, and challenges

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hatefi M (2019) Indifference threshold-based attribute ratio analysis: a method for assigning the weights to the attributes in multiple attribute decision making

    Google Scholar 

  8. Liu M, Ren H (2014) A new intuitionistic fuzzy entropy and application in multi-attribute decision making. Information 5(4):587–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zadeh LA (1968) Probability measures of fuzzy events. J Math Anal Appl 23:421–427

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. De Luca A, Termini S (1972) A definition of non-probabilistic entropy in the setting of fuzzy set theory. Inf Control 20:301–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Burillo P, Bustince H (2001) Entropy on intuitionistic fuzzy sets and on interval-valued fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 118:305–316

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen S-M, Cheng S-H, Chiou C-H (2016) Fuzzy multiattribute group decision making based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets and evidential reasoning methodology. Inf Fusion 27(2):215–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Aikhuele D, Turan F (2017) An intuitionistic fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making method based on an exponential-related function. Int J Fuzzy Syst Appl 6(4):33–46

    Google Scholar 

  14. Liu S, Yu W, Liu L, Hu Y (2019) Variable weights theory and its application to multi-attribute group decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy numbers on determining decision maker’s weights

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zeng S, Su W (2011) Intuitionistic fuzzy ordered weighted distance operator. Knowl-Based Syst 24(8):1224–1232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Xu Z (2010) A deviation-based approach to intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute group decision making. Group Decis Negot 19(1):57–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yue Z (2014) TOPSIS-based group decision-making methodology in intuitionistic fuzzy setting. Inf Sci 277:141–153

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Ministry of Higher Education for providing financial support under Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS) No. FRGS/1/2019/TK10/UMP/02/10 (University reference RDU1901158) and Universiti Malaysia Pahang for the facilities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Faiz Mohd Turan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ayasrah, O., Mohd Turan, F. (2022). Assessing Integrated TOPSIS Model with Exponential Intuitionistic Entropy Measure: A Case Study. In: Abdul Sani, A.S., et al. Enabling Industry 4.0 through Advances in Manufacturing and Materials. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2890-1_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics