Skip to main content

Optimising MIG Weld Bead Geometry of Hot Rolled Carbon Steel Using Response Surface Method

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Enabling Industry 4.0 through Advances in Manufacturing and Materials

Abstract

This paper presents the optimisation of weld bead geometry, through Metal Inert Gas butt-welding. Many failures occur in joints due to the bad quality of welding, influenced by a range of parameters across the welding process. With the rapid advancement of computer and automated technologies, new statistical methods for modelling and optimising have been developed. These have eliminated the need for performing experiments on the basis of conventional trial and error, for performance and quality. Experimental methods were set by selecting process parameters, which include the welding current, arc voltage and welding speed and employing a central composite design of Response Surface Methodology method. These methods were adopted as the statistical design of experimental techniques to analyse the performance of the weld bead geometry, i.e. bead height, bead width and penetration, in order to expound the numerical expression between the welding process parameters and the output variable. The results obtained from developing these models indicate that the model predicts weld bead geometry adequately. The effectiveness of process parameters can be estimated by applying the developed mathematical models to a given bead geometry, indicating the change of parameters influences the bead height and width more significantly than penetration alone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Gao Z, Shao X, Jiang P, Cao L, Zhou Q, Yue C, Liu Y, Wang C (2016) Parameter optimization of hybrid fiber laser-arc butt welding on 316L stainless steel using Kriging model and GA. Opt Laser Technol 83:153–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Atzori B, Lazzarin P, Meneghetti G, Ricotta M (2009) Fatigue design of complex welded structures. Int J Fatigue 31:59–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lazić V, Aleksandrović S, Nikolić R, Prokić-Cvetković R, Popović O, Milosavljević D, Čukić R (2012) Estimates of weldability and selection of the optimal procedure and technology for welding of high strength steels. Procedia Eng 40:310–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ramos-Jaime D, Juárez IL, Perez P (2013) Effect of process parameters on robotic gmaw bead area estimation. Procedia Technol 7:398–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Balasubramanian M (2016) Prediction of optimum weld pool geometry of PCTIG welded titanium alloy using statistical design. Eng Sci Technol Int J 19:15–21

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sharma C, Dwivedi DK, Kumar P (2012) Effect of welding parameters on microstructure and mechanical properties of friction stir welded joints of AA7039 aluminum alloy. Mater Des 36:379–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ganjigatti JP, Pratihar DK, Roy Choudhury A (2007) Global versus cluster-wise regression analyses for prediction of bead geometry in MIG welding process. J Mater Process Technol 189:352–366

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ibrahim IA, Mohamat SA, Amir A, Ghalib A (2010) Effect of arc voltage, welding current and welding speed on fatigue life, impact energy and bead penetration of AA6061 joints produced by robotic MIG welding. Indian J Sci Technol 3(2)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Palani PK, Murugan N (2006) Review selection of parameter of pulsed current gas metal arc welding. J Mater Process Technol 172:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kolahan F, Heidari M (2009) A new approach for predicting and optimizing weld bead geometry in GMAW, vol 59. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pal A, Handuja S (2014) The analysis of MIG welding parameters for multi response optimization using Taguchi’s Orthogonal array and Grey relational approach. Int J Adv Res Eng Sci Technol

    Google Scholar 

  12. Asibeluo IS, Emifoniye E (2015) Effect of arc welding current on the mechanical properties of a36 carbon steel weld joints. SSRG Int J Mech Eng 2

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ai Y, Jiang P, Shao X, Wang C, Li P, Mi G, Liu Y, Liu W (2016) A defect-responsive optimization method for the fiber laser butt welding of dissimilar materials. Mater Des 90:669–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Eltawahni HA, Olabi AG, Benyounis KY (2010) Effect of process parameters and optimization of CO2 laser cutting of ultra high-performance polyethylene. Mater Des 31:4029–4038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Elatharasana G, Kumar VSS (2013) An experimental analysis and optimization of process parameter on friction stir welding of AA 6061-T6 aluminum alloy using RSM. Procedia Eng 64:1227–1234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Khan MMA, Romoli L, Fiaschi M, Dini G, Sarri F (2011) Experimental design approach to the process parameter optimization for laser welding of martensitic stainless steels in a constrained overlap configuration. Opt Laser Technol 43:158–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bidi L, Le Masson P, Cicala E, Primault C (2017) Experimental design method to the weld bead geometry optimization for hybrid laser-MAG welding in a narrow chamfer configuration. Opt Laser Technol 89:114–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Umanath K, Palanikumar K (2015) Influence of process parameter on microstructural characteristics and tensile properties of friction welded ASS304L alloy. Appl Mech Mater 766–767

    Google Scholar 

  19. Palani PK, Murugan N (2007) Optimization of weld bead geometry for stainless steel claddings deposited by FCAW. J Mater Process Technol 190:291–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Elatharasan G, Kumar VSS (2012) Modelling and optimization of friction stir welding parameters for dissimilar aluminium alloys using RSM. Procedia Eng 38:3477–3481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ruggiero A, Tricarico L, Olabi AG, Benyounis KY (2011) Weld-bead profile and costs optimisation of the CO2 dissimilar laser welding process of low carbon steel and austenitic steel AISI316. Opt Laser Technol 43:82–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Acherjee B, Misra D, Bose D, Venkadeshwaran K (2009) Prediction of weld strength and seam width for laser transmission welding of thermoplastic using response surface methodology. Opt Laser Technol 41:956–967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Khataee AR, Fathinia M, Aber S, Zarei M (2010) Optimization of photocatalytic treatment of dye solution on supported TiO2 nanoparticles by central composite design: Intermediate’s identification. J Hazard Mater 181:886–897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Benyounis KY, Olabi AG, Hashmi MSJ (2005) Optimizing the laser-welded butt joints of medium carbon steel using RSM. J Mater Process Technol 164–165:986–989

    Google Scholar 

  25. Panneerselvam K, Lenin K (2015) Parameter’s optimization in FSW of polypropylene based on RSM. Multidiscip Model Mater Struct 11:32–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lakshminarayanan AK, Balasubramanian V (2009) Comparison of RSM with ANN in predicting tensile strength of friction stir welded AA7039 aluminium alloy joints. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China 19:9–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Reisgen U, Schleser M, Mokrov O, Ahmed E (2012) Statistical modeling of laser welding of DP/TRIP steel sheets. Opt Laser Technol 44:92–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jenney CL, O’Brien A (2001) Welding handbook, 9th edn., vol 1. Welding Science and Technology, American Welding Society (AWS)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zhao Y, Zhang Y, Hu W, Lai X (2012) Optimization of laser welding thin-gage galvanized steel via response surface methodology. Opt Lasers Eng 50:1267–1273

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Ministry of Higher Education for providing financial support under Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS) No. FRGS/1/2019/TK10/UMP/02/10 (University reference RDU1901158) and Universiti Malaysia Pahang for the facilities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Faiz Mohd Turan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mohd Said, J., Mohd Turan, F. (2022). Optimising MIG Weld Bead Geometry of Hot Rolled Carbon Steel Using Response Surface Method. In: Abdul Sani, A.S., et al. Enabling Industry 4.0 through Advances in Manufacturing and Materials. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2890-1_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics