Abstract
Modular construction (MC) is one of the vital members of the off-site construction (OSC) family and identifies as an innovative modern method of construction (MMC). Over the last two decades, several research studies have highlighted the distinctive benefits of MC in contrast to conventional in-situ construction. Particularly in developed economies, a greater inclination towards adopting MC practices is visible. However, there is limited research investigating the environmental sustainability of MC, especially in developing countries such as Sri Lanka. Even the available literature, the majority only addresses limited phases of the life cycle of the buildings. Furthermore, selecting the system boundary and collecting reliable and comprehensive process data are some of the inherent difficulties in the environmental assessment processes, explaining the lack of research in this domain. Moreover, the lack of country-specific life cycle data is a significant barrier the developing regions face when conducting environmental performance research of MC. Notably, a systematic methodological framework for assessing the environmental sustainability of modular construction through a life cycle perspective still lacks in the relevant literature. Hence, this paper proposed a methodological framework through a life cycle perspective for assessing the environmental sustainability of MC projects by employing the so-called life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology. The application of the proposed framework will attempt to validate through a pilot case study. The proposed framework offers a systematic method for future studies on investigating the environmental performance of modular constructed facilities using an LCA approach.
Keywords
- Environmental sustainability
- Life cycle assessment (LCA)
- Methodological framework
- Modular construction (MC)
- Off-site construction (OSC)
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Abd Rashid AF, Yusoff S (2015) A review of life cycle assessment method for building industry. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 45:244–248
Kamali M, Hewage K (2016) Life cycle performance of modular buildings: a critical review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 62:1171–1183
Minunno R, O’Grady T, Morrison GM, Gruner RL (2020) Exploring environmental benefits of reuse and recycle practices: a circular economy case study of a modular building. Resour Conserv Recycl 160:104855
Sonnemann G, Vigon B (2011) Global guidance principles for life cycle assessment (LCA) databases: a basis for greener processes and products
Aye L, Ngo T, Crawford RH, Gammampila R, Mendis P (2012) Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and energy analysis of prefabricated reusable building modules. Energy Build 47:159–168
Sandanayake M, Zhang G, Setunge S (2014) Life-cycle assessment for construction processes in building construction: a proposed conceptual framework. In: Proceedings of the 3rd world construction symposium 2014: sustainability and development in built environment, 20–22 June 2014, Colombo, Sri Lanka, 2014. Ceylon Institute of Builders (CIOB), pp 344–355
Suh S, Lenzen M, Treloar GJ, Hondo H, Horvath A, Huppes G, Jolliet O, Klann U, Krewitt W, Moriguchi Y (2004) System boundary selection in life-cycle inventories using hybrid approaches. Environ Sci Technol 38:657–664
Du Q, Bao T, Li Y, Huang Y, Shao L (2019) Impact of prefabrication technology on the cradle-to-site CO2 emissions of residential buildings. Clean Technol Environ Policy 21:1499–1514
Crawford RH (2008) Validation of a hybrid life-cycle inventory analysis method. J Environ Manage 88:496–506
Hu X, Chong H-Y, Wang X (2019) Sustainability perceptions of off-site manufacturing stakeholders in Australia. J Clean Prod 227:346–354
Jin R, Hong J, Zuo J (2020) Environmental performance of off-site constructed facilities: a critical review. Energy Build 207:109567
Boafo FE, Kim J-H, Kim J-T (2016) Performance of modular prefabricated architecture: case study-based review and future pathways. Sustainability 8:558
Thai H-T, Ngo T, Uy B (2020) A review on modular construction for high-rise buildings. Structures. Elsevier, pp 1265–1290
Nam S, Yoon J, Kim K, Choi B (2020) Optimization of prefabricated components in housing modular construction. Sustainability 12:10269
Hammad AW, Akbarnezhad A, Wu P, Wang X, Haddad A (2019) Building information modelling-based framework to contrast conventional and modular construction methods through selected sustainability factors. J Clean Prod 228:1264–1281
Jeong J, Hong T, Ji C, Kim J, Lee M, Jeong K, Lee S (2017) An integrated evaluation of productivity, cost and CO2 emission between prefabricated and conventional columns. J Clean Prod 142:2393–2406
Alhumayani H, Gomaa M, Soebarto V, Jabi W (2020) Environmental assessment of large-scale 3D printing in construction: a comparative study between cob and concrete. J Clean Prod 270:122463
Monahan J, Powell JC (2011) An embodied carbon and energy analysis of modern methods of construction in housing: a case study using a lifecycle assessment framework. Energy Build 43:179–188
Tumminia G, Guarino F, Longo S, Ferraro M, Cellura M, Antonucci V (2018) Life cycle energy performances and environmental impacts of a prefabricated building module. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 92:272–283
Kamali M, Hewage K, Sadiq R (2019) Conventional versus modular construction methods: a comparative cradle-to-gate LCA for residential buildings. Energy Build 204:109479
Teng Y, Pan W (2019) Systematic embodied carbon assessment and reduction of prefabricated high-rise public residential buildings in Hong Kong. J Clean Prod 238:117791
Satola D, Kristiansen AB, Houlihan-Wiberg A, Gustavsen A, Ma T, Wang R (2020) Comparative life cycle assessment of various energy efficiency designs of a container-based housing unit in China: a case study. Build Environ 186:107358
Balasbaneh AT, Ramli MZ (2020) A comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) of concrete and steel-prefabricated prefinished volumetric construction structures in Malaysia. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:43186–43201
Saltelli A (2002) Sensitivity analysis for importance assessment. Risk Anal 22:579–590
Renschler P (2013) What is the difference between sensitivity analysis and uncertainty analysis? [online]. Quora. Available https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-difference-between-sensitivity-analysis-and-uncertainty-analysis. Accessed Oct 20 2021
CFI Education. Scenario analysis vs sensitivity analysis
Mao C, Shen Q, Shen L, Tang L (2013) Comparative study of greenhouse gas emissions between off-site prefabrication and conventional construction methods: two case studies of residential projects. Energy Build 66:165–176
Kumanayake R, Luo H (2018) Life cycle carbon emission assessment of a multi-purpose university building: a case study of Sri Lanka. Front Eng Manage 5:381–393
Devi P, Palaniappan S (2014) A case study on life cycle energy use of residential building in Southern India. Energy Build 80:247–259
Sim J, Sim J, Park C (2016) The air emission assessment of a South Korean apartment building’s life cycle, along with environmental impact. Build Environ 95:104–115
Latawiec R, Woyciechowski P, Kowalski KJ (2018) Sustainable concrete performance—CO2-emission. Environments 5:27
Sri Lanka Sustainable Energy Authority. Carbon footprint
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to Dr. C. S. Bandara for the support given in acquiring valuable information needed for this research study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Jayawardana, J., Kulatunga, A.K., Sandanayake, M., Zhang, G., Jayasinghe, J.A.S.C. (2023). Life Cycle Assessment for Modular-Constructed Buildings: A Proposed Methodological Framework. In: Dissanayake, R., Mendis, P., Weerasekera, K., De Silva, S., Fernando, S., Konthesingha, C. (eds) 12th International Conference on Structural Engineering and Construction Management. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 266. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2886-4_37
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2886-4_37
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-2885-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-2886-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)