Skip to main content

Analysis of the Effect of Mobility Model and Traffic Agent Variations on Routing Protocol Performance on Mobile Ad-Hoc Network

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of Seventh International Congress on Information and Communication Technology

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 465))

Abstract

The wireless network is a communication network that allows users to communicate with each other without using a wired intermediary. One of the most popular wireless network technologies is the mobile ad-hoc network (MANET). The proper routing protocol is needed in designing the MANET network because each user acts as a router or determines his path in sending information to the intended user. Mobility models and traffic agents also affect the performance of the MANET network route protocol. The mobility model represents users’ movement in every condition of the MANET network, and the traffic agent acts as a protocol that allows users to connect and share information. This research used AODV, DSDV, and DSR as the routing protocols. Random waypoint and Manhattan grid are used as the mobility model. TCP/FTP and UDP/CRB are used as the traffic agent. The DSR protocol has the highest throughput and packet delivery ratio values in each variation of mobility models with TCP/FTP traffic agent with the highest value of 638 Kbps at 60 node variation and 99.95% packet delivery ratio at 20 node variation. In comparison, the AODV protocol has higher throughput and packet delivery ratio values for each variation of mobility models with UDP/CBR traffic agents with the highest values of 85 Kbps and 99.93%. The residual energy values for the AODV and DSR protocols have relative values, but the DSR protocol holds the highest value for all variations of 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100 nodes. The highest residual energy value is in the variation of 100 nodes random waypoint TCP/FTP with 24798.73 J.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kumar S, Kumar CDS (2015) Study of manet: characteristics, challenges, application, routing protocol and security attacks. Int J 2

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jiatmiko N, Prayudi Y (2015) Simulasi jaringan manet dengan ns3 untuk membandingkan performa routing protokol aodv dan dsdv

    Google Scholar 

  3. Manapa ES, Sampetoding EAM, Lewakabessy G (2020) Potensi penggunaan mobile ad-hoc network (manet) sebagai alat komunikasi data pada transportasi di Indonesia. J Dyn Saint 4:865–868

    Google Scholar 

  4. Alamsyah A, Setijadi E, Purnama IKE, Purnomo MH (2018) Analisis kinerja protokol routing reaktif dan proaktif pada manet menggunakan ns2. Jurnal Nasional Teknik Elektro dan Teknologi Informasi (JNTETI) 7:138–143. [Online]. Available http://ejnteti.jteti.ugm.ac.id/index.php/JNTETI/article/view/414

  5. Nurusshobah M, Trisnawan PH, Amron K (2019) Analisis kinerja protokol routing dynamic manet on-demand (dymo) dan cluster based routing protocol (cbrp) pada mobile ad-hoc network (manet). Jurnal Pengembangan Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer e-ISSN 2548:964X

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gupta AK, Sadawarti H, Verma AK (2013) Performance analysis of manet routing protocols in different mobility models. Int J Inf Technol Comput Sci 5:73–82

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sharma R, Gupta K (2012) Comparison based performance analysis of udp/cbr and tcp/ftp traffic under aodv routing protocol in manet. Int J Comput Appl 56:28–35

    Google Scholar 

  8. Taufan B, Primananda R, Data M (2018) Analisis perbandingan kinerja protokol routing olsr dan dsdv pada manet berdasarkan pergerakan node. Jurnal Pengembangan Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer. e-ISSNN 2548:964X

    Google Scholar 

  9. Appiah M (2017) Performance comparison of mobility models in mobile ad hoc network (manet). In: 2017 1st International conference on next generation computing applications, NextComp 2017, pp 47–53

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was financially supported by Institut Teknologi Kalimantan (ITK) through grant 2159/IT10/PPM.05/2021.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barokatun Hasanah .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hasanah, B., Mahardika, I., Wicaksono, H., Farid, M.N. (2023). Analysis of the Effect of Mobility Model and Traffic Agent Variations on Routing Protocol Performance on Mobile Ad-Hoc Network. In: Yang, XS., Sherratt, S., Dey, N., Joshi, A. (eds) Proceedings of Seventh International Congress on Information and Communication Technology. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 465. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2397-5_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2397-5_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-2396-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-2397-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics