Abstract
This study intends to explore legal frameworks and ethical considerations that would regulate social media use to promote politics and for social interaction in the context of Ethiopia. Apparently, social medias are found convenient, effective, and less expensive to market political agendas and to reach out voters easily. Particularly, they are ideal to attract young voters who have low interest in politics because of ease of generating contents, commenting and reflecting on posts, ease of sharing contents to large audience breaking down barriers to freedom of expression. Data for the study were gathered through domain expert involved focus group discussion (FGD). Thematic analysis approach was used to generate themes and insights from the data. The study reveals interesting results on two key relevant issues: media law and individual rights. From the perspectives of media law and policy, the study uncovered paucity and loopholes connected to nurturing a culture of constructive critique on political matters, the need to have sound communication policy at all key governmental institutions, weak regulatory system in terms of crafting and enforcing relevant media laws, the tendency of demeaning accountability on the side of social media companies and social media users, the need to explore legal and diplomatic pressures on social media companies to discharge their corporate social responsibilities by protecting the platform they have developed not to be used to incite conflict, violence, and human right abuses. With regard to upholding fundamental human rights, social medias have provided great opportunities to the general public to easily air out their views and promote political agendas they support. Social medias also paved the way to realize freedom of speech, which presupposes orderly liberty that do not grant a license to threaten individual’s existential rights opening the door for gross human right violations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Astuti PAA, Hangsing P (2016) Social media and effort to coax young voters in Jakarta, Indonesia. Scriptura 6(1):1–13
Aswad EM (2020) In a world of “Fake News”, What's a social media platform to do? Utah L Rev 1009
Belay EG, Mengesha GH, Asale MA (2020, July) The tributes and perils of social media use practices in ethiopian socio-political landscape. In: International conference on human-computer interaction. Springer, Cham, pp 199–209
Berger G (2009) Freedom of expression, access to information and empowerment of people
Bimber B (2005) Reconceptualizing collective action in the contemporary media environment. Commun Theor 15:365–388
Gagliardone I, Pohjonen M (2016) Engaging in polarized society: social media and political discourse in Ethiopia. In: Digital activism in the social media era. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, pp 25–44
Gorodnichenko Y, Pham T, Talavera O (2021) Social media, sentiment and public opinions: evidence from #Brexit and #USElection. Eur Econ Rev 103772
Hailu H (2015) The state of cybercrime governance in Ethiopia. Article published on ResearchGate. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322234805_THE_STATE_OF_CYBERCRIME_GOVERNANCE_IN_ETHIOPIA.
Halefom H (2015) The state of cybercrime governance in Ethiopia. Abyssinia Law. https://www.abyssinialaw.com
Hofstede G (1983) National cultures in four dimensions: a research-based theory of cultural differences among nations. Int Stud Manage Organ 13(1-2):46–74
Howard PN, Agarwal SD, Hussain MM (2011) When do states disconnect their digital networks? Regime responses to the political uses of social media. Commun Rev 14(3):216–232
Howard P, Sheetal A, Muzammil H (2010) When do states disconnect their digital networks? Regime responses to the political uses of social media. The commun Rev 14:1
Howard PN (2010) Digital origins of dictatorship and democracy: the Internet and political Islam, New York, NY: Oxford University Press
Hänska M, Bauchowitz S (2017) Tweeting for Brexit: how social media influenced the referendum
Michailova S, Hutchings K (2006) National cultural influences on knowledge sharing: a comparison of China and Russia. J Manage Stud 43(3):383–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00595.x
Salter M (2017) Crime, justice and social media. Routledge
Situmeang DM, Siringoringo M (2018) Social media abuse that defends particular parties reviewed from law of ITE number 11 in 2008 concerning electronic information and transaction. Int J English Literature Social Sci 3(5):265270
Still, B. (2005). Hacking for a cause. First Monday 10:1. http://irstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1274/1194. https://irstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1274/1194
UNESCO (2009) Freedom of expression, Access to information and empowerment of people. https://www.unesco.org/en
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mengesha, G.H., Belay, E.G., Asale, M.A. (2023). Legal Frameworks and Issues of Social Media Use for Politics. In: Yang, XS., Sherratt, S., Dey, N., Joshi, A. (eds) Proceedings of Seventh International Congress on Information and Communication Technology. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 464. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2394-4_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2394-4_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-2393-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-2394-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)