Abstract
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a movement-related disorder that negatively impacts the central nervous system. It is progressive, which means that patients’ condition worsens over time. According to literature, it is more common among men as compared to women. It affects a person in various ways such as in its initial stages, it may cause a few tremors in certain body parts and the consequences worsen throughout its progression—difficulties in speech, writing, and movement all develop eventually. This paper performs an effective comparison of an individual as well as ensemble machine learning methods on quantitative acoustic measure data for PD classification. In individual models, category Support vector machine (SVM), Naive Bayes, Decision Tree, K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), and Logistic Regression approaches have been adopted. In the category of ensemble models Random Forest, Gradient boosting, Adaptive Boosting, and XGBoost. The models were evaluated and compared using performance metrics such as Recall, F1 score, Precision, and Accuracy. Results indicate that XGBoost performs well than others.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Goetz CG (2011) “The history of Parkinson’s disease: early clinical descriptions and neurological therapies. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a008862
Radhakrishnan DM, Goyal V (2018) Parkinson’s disease: a review. Neurol India 66(7):S26–S35. https://doi.org/10.4103/0028-3886.226451
Das R (2010) A comparison of multiple classification methods for diagnosis of Parkinson disease. Expert Syst Appl 37(2):1568–1572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.06.040
Sriram TV, Rao MV, Narayana GVS, Kaladhar D, Vital TPR (2013) Intelligent Parkinson disease prediction using machine learning algorithms. Int J Eng Innov Technol 212–215. [Online]. Available: http://www.ijeit.com/Vol3/Issue 3/IJEIT1412201309_33.pdf
Bind S, Tiwari AK, Sahani AK (2015) A survey of machine learning based approaches for Parkinson disease prediction. Int J Comput Sci Inf Technol 6(2):1648–1655. [Online]. Available: http://www.ijcsit.com/docs/Volume6/vol6issue02/ijcsit20150602163.pdf
Sujatha J, Rajagopalan SP (2017) Performance evaluation of machine learning algorithms in the classification of parkinson disease using voice attributes. Int J Appl Eng Res 12(21):10669–10675
Javed Mehedi Shamrat FM, Asaduzzaman M, Rahman AKMS, Tusher RTH, Tasnim Z (2019) A comparative analysis of parkinson disease prediction using machine learning approaches. Int J Sci Technol Res 8(11):2576–2580
Mozhdehfarahbakhsh A, Chitsazian S, Chakrabarti S, Chakrabarti T, Kateb B, Nami M (2021) An MRI-based deep learning model to predict Parkinson’s disease stages. medRxiv, pp 2021.02.19.21252081, 2021, [Online]. Available https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.19.21252081
Karan B, Sahu SS, Mahto K (2020) Stacked auto-encoder based time-frequency features of Speech signal for Parkinson disease prediction. In: 2020 international conference artificial intelligence signal processing AISP 2020, January, pp 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/AISP48273.2020.9073595
Warden MN, Searles Nielsen S, Camacho-Soto A, Garnett R, Racette BA (2021) A comparison of prediction approaches for identifying prodromal Parkinson disease. PLoS One 16(8):e0256592. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256592
Nilashi M, Ibrahim O, Ahani A (2016) Accuracy improvement for predicting parkinson’s disease progression. Sci Rep 6:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34181
Wenning GK, Ben-Shlomo Y, Hughes A, Daniel SE, Lees A, Quinn NP (2000) What clinical features are most useful to distinguish definite multiple system atrophy from Parkinson’s disease? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 68(4):434–440. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.68.4.434
Hall TO et al (2013) Risk prediction for complex diseases: application to Parkinson disease. Genet Med 15(5):361–367. https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2012.109
Darweesh SKL, Koudstaal PJ, Stricker BH, Hofman A, Steyerberg EW, Ikram MA (2016) Predicting Parkinson disease in the community using a nonmotor risk score. Eur J Epidemiol 31(7):679–684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-016-0130-1
Lin CH et al (2019) Blood NfL: a biomarker for disease severity and progression in Parkinson disease. Neurology 93(11):e1104–e1111. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000008088
Little MA, McSharry PE, Roberts SJ, Costello DAE, Moroz IM (2007) Exploiting nonlinear recurrence and fractal scaling properties for voice disorder detection. Biomed Eng Online 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-6-23
Suganya P, Sumathi CP (2015) A novel metaheuristic data mining algorithm for the detection and classification of Parkinson disease. Indian J Sci Technol 8(14). https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2015/v8i14/72685
Campbell MC et al (2020) Parkinson disease clinical subtypes: key features and clinical milestones. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 7(8):1272–1283. https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.51102
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sabu, K., Ramnath, M., Choudhary, A., Raj, G., Prakash Agrawal, A. (2022). A Comparison of Traditional and Ensemble Machine Learning Approaches for Parkinson’s Disease Classification. In: Skala, V., Singh, T.P., Choudhury, T., Tomar, R., Abul Bashar, M. (eds) Machine Intelligence and Data Science Applications. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, vol 132. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2347-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2347-0_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-2346-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-2347-0
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)