Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

AIC for Clients’ Perceived Risk on Online Buying Intention

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Mobile Computing and Sustainable Informatics

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies ((LNDECT,volume 126))

  • 505 Accesses

Abstract

The Internet has switched on the instrument of media as well as a business all over the world, and buying merchandise online has become something plausible for buyers. Besides, the Web grants clients to shop at whatever point and wherever, with the ability to contrast items and costs, with few clicks and to peruse the reviews of various buyers for the liked items and the picked e-shop. However, there are a few potential risks noticed by the buyers in Internet shopping, for instance, the trust in retailers, abuse of buyers’ information, the late delivery time, or damaged goods in delivery that make buyers cancel online purchases. Thus, the purpose of this research points to empirical research of Akaike information criterion (AIC) for clients’ perceived risk on Internet buying intent. The AIC approach is used for data analysis, and the results in the optimal model indicate that the clients’ perceived risks such as financial risk, product risk, security risk, and psychological risk, negatively impacted clients’ online buying intention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sudibyo, H., Hartanti, G.., Ikhsan, R., Yuniarty: Proceedings of 2020 International Conference on Information Management and Technology, ICIMTech 2020, pp. 87–92 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/icimtech50083.2020.9211269

  2. Balogh, Z., Mészáros, K.: Consumer perceived risk by online purchasing: the experiences in Hungary. Naše gospodarstvo/Our Economy 66, 14–21 (2020). https://doi.org/10.2478/ngoe-2020-0014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Suryaningsih, I.B., Farida, L., Revanica, O., Kusuma, A.A.M.: The effect of coupon sales promotion, online customer review and perceived enjoyment on repurchase intention in e-commerce shopee. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res. 8, 435–440 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pandian, A.P.: performance evaluation and comparison using deep learning techniques in sentiment analysis. J. Soft Comput. Paradigm 3, 123–134 (2021). https://doi.org/10.36548/jscp.2021.2.006

  5. Octaviani, E.S., Gunawan, H.: Perceived risk on consumer online shopping behaviour. J. Appl. Account. Taxation 3, 203–209 (2018). https://doi.org/10.30871/jaat.v3i2.876

  6. Paynter, J., Lim, J.: Drivers and impediments to e-commerce in Malaysia. Malays. J. Libr. Inf. Sci. 6, 1–19 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hsu, S.-H., Luan, P.: The perception risk of online shopping impacted on the consumer’s attitude and purchase intention in Hanoi, Vietnam. J. Bus. Econ. Policy 4, 19–29 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kottursamy, K.: A review on finding efficient approach to detect customer emotion analysis using deep learning analysis. J. Trends Comput. Sci. Smart Technol. 3, 95–113 (2021). https://doi.org/10.36548/jtcsst.2021.2.003

  9. Ariffin, S., Mohan, T., Goh, Y.-N.: Influence of consumers’ perceived risk on consumers’ online purchase intention. J. Res. Interact. Mark. 12, 309–327 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-11-2017-0100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Xie, C.: The influence of perceived risk on purchase intention—a case study of taobao online shopping of fresh fruit. Asian Agric. Res. 9, 30–35 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hong, L.M., Nawi, N.C., Zulkiffli, W.F.W., Mukhtar, D., Ramlee, S.I.F.: Perceived risk on online store image towards purchase intention. Res. World Econ. 10, 48–52 (2019). https://doi.org/10.5430/rwe.v10n2p48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim, L.H., Kim, D.J., Leong, J.K.: The effect of perceived risk on purchase intention in purchasing airline tickets online. J. Hosp. Leis. Mark. 13, 33–53 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1300/J150v13n02_04

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bhukya, R., Singh, S.: The effect of perceived risk dimensions on purchase intention: an empirical evidence from Indian private labels market. Am. J. Bus. 30, 218–230 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1108/AJB-10-2014-0055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sulaiman, Y., Yusr, M.M., Ismail, K.A.: The influence of marketing mix and perceived risk factors on online purchase intentions. Int. J. Res. Bus. Stud. Manage. 4, 11 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ashoer, M., Said, S.: The impact of perceived risk on consumer purchase intention in Indonesia; a social commerce study. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Accounting, Management, Economics and Social Sciences (ICAMESS), pp. 1–14 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bauer, R.: Consumer behavior and risk taking. In: Hancock, R. (ed.) Dynamic Marketing for a Changing, pp. 389–398. American Marketing Association, Chicago (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dowling, G.R., Staelin, R.: A model of perceived risk and intended risk-handling activity. J. Consumer Res. 21, 119–134 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1086/209386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mitchell, V.W., Greatorex, M.: Risk perception and reduction in the purchase of consumer services. Serv. Ind. J. 13, 179–200 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069300000068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Laroche, M., Yang, Z., McDougall, G.H.G., Bergeron, J.: Internet versus bricks-and-mortar retailers: an investigation into intangibility and its consequences. J. Retail. 81, 251–267 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2004.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ko, H., Jung, J., Kim, J., Shim, S.W.: Cross-cultural differences in perceived risk of online shopping. J. Interact. Advert. 4, 20–29 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2004.10722084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Murphy, P.E., Enis, B.M.: Classifying products strategically. J. Mark. 50, 24–42 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Featherman, M.S., Pavlou, P.A.: Predicting e-services adoption: a perceived risk facets perspective. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 59, 451–474 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00111-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pentz, C.D., du Preez, R., Swiegers, L.: To bu(Y) or not to bu(Y): perceived risk barriers to online shopping among South African generation Y consumers. Cogent Bus. Manage. 7, 1–25 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1827813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zielke, S.Z., Dobbelstein, T.D.: Customers’ willingness to purchase new store brands. J. Product Brand Manage. 16, 112–121 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1108/10610420710739982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Almousa, M.: Perceived risk in apparel online shopping: a multi dimensional perspective. Can. Soc. Sci. 7, 23–31 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Claudia, I.: Perceived risk when buying online: evidence from a semi-structured interview. Econ. Ser. 22, 63–73 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ariff, M.S.M., Sylvester, M., Zakuan, N., Ismail, K., Ali, K.M.: Consumer perceived risk, attitude and online shopping behaviour; Empirical evidence from Malaysia. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 58, 012007 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/58/1/012007

  28. Kim, I.: Consumers’ rankings of risk reduction strategies in e-shopping. Int. J. Bus. Res. 10, 143–148 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Soltanpanah, H.: A review of the literature of perceived risk and identifying its various facets in e-commerce by customers: focusing on developing countries. Afr. J. Bus. Manage. 6, 2888–2896 (2012). https://doi.org/10.5897/ajbm11.1409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Dig, I.C., Domingo, L.M., Consignado, M.: Perceived risks and online purchase intention of young professionals in the fifth district of Cavite. In: DLSU Research Congress 2017, pp. 1–7 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ueltschy, L., Krampf, R., Yannopoulos, P.: A cross-national study of perceived consumer risk towards online (internet) purchasing. Multinatl. Bus. Rev. 12, 59–82 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Pavlou, P.A.: Int. J. Electron. Commer. 7, 101–134 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Folarin, T.O., Ogundare, E.A.: Influence of customers’ perceived risk on online shopping intention in Malaysia’s apparel industry. Int. J. Inf. Syst. Eng. 4, 69–81 (2016). https://doi.org/10.24924/ijise/2016.11/v4.iss2/69.81

  34. Choon Ling, K., Bin Daud, D., Hoi Piew, T., Keoy, K.H., Hassan, P.: Perceived risk, perceived technology, online trust for the online purchase intention in Malaysia. Int. J. Bus. Manage. 6, 167–182 (2011). https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v6n6p167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Akaike, H.: A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 19, 716–723 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Chaurasia, A., Harel, O.: Model selection rates of information based criteria. Electron. J. Stat. 7, 2762–2793 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1214/13-EJS861

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Bulteel, K., Wilderjans, T.F., Tuerlinckx, F., Ceulemans, E.: CHull as an alternative to AIC and BIC in the context of mixtures of factor analyzers. Behav. Res. Methods 45, 782–791 (2013). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0293-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M.: A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage, Los Angeles, CA (2017)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Industrial University of Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

    Dam Tri Cuong

Authors
  1. Dam Tri Cuong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dam Tri Cuong .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Engineering, Tribhuvan University, Pulchowk Campus, Lalitpur, Nepal

    Subarna Shakya

  2. University of Applied Sciences, Athens, Greece

    Klimis Ntalianis

  3. Department of Computer Science, Texas Southern University, Houston, TX, USA

    Khaled A. Kamel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Cuong, D.T. (2022). AIC for Clients’ Perceived Risk on Online Buying Intention. In: Shakya, S., Ntalianis, K., Kamel, K.A. (eds) Mobile Computing and Sustainable Informatics. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, vol 126. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2069-1_39

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation