Skip to main content

Empirical Methods for Modelling Economic Insecurity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Economic Measurement

Abstract

This chapter presents an overview of some of the technical methods used to measure Economic Insecurity (EI). We discuss conceptual challenges associated with measurement and provide a basic conceptual model for characterizing anxiety stemming from economic risk. Surveyed methods include (i) subjective indices, (ii) axiomatic methods derived from microeconomic theory, (iii) micro-econometric approaches and (iv) macro-level or aggregate methods. Some illustrations are provided using Australian panel data. We show that there is considerable heterogeneity in outcomes across different measurement concepts—it is common for markers to be uncorrelated or even negatively associated across our sample. More work is needed integrating alternative risk concepts within the broader framework of EI. Despite this ambiguity, two robust results still emerge. Across a suite of different measures, EI is (i) correlated with other markers of social disadvantage, and (ii) predictive of diminished health and well-being, even after conditioning on current socioeconomic status.

The unit record data from the HILDA Survey were obtained from the Australian Data Archive, which is hosted by The Australian National University. The HILDA Survey was initiated and is funded by the Australian Government Department of Social Services (DSS) and is managed by the Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research (Melbourne Institute). The findings and views based on the data, however, are those of the author and should not be attributed to the Australian Government, DSS, the Melbourne Institute, the Australian Data Archive or the Australian National University and none of those entities bear any responsibility for the analysis or interpretation of the unit record data from the HILDA Survey provided by the author

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/issue-briefs/2015/02/americans-financial-security-perceptions-and-reality.

  2. 2.

    For example, future joblessness is unlikely to be a source of EI if it reflects an underlying preference or can be planned for well in advance (e.g. a decision to retire).

  3. 3.

    For example, a recently graduated university student may have a historically volatile income stream and hence appear potentially insecure, even if they are in the process of moving into a stable and well-paying job.

  4. 4.

    A relative measure based upon income volatility would focus on percentage changes to income (e.g. a 20% reduction from one year to the next) rather than unit changes (a $20,000 reduction from one year to another).

  5. 5.

    Note that the intermediate stream \(y\left(t\right)=\left(\mathrm{0,0},\mathrm{0,0}\right)\) also needs to yield an intermediate insecurity score.

  6. 6.

    Other allowances can be made for the presence of safety nets, such as health insurance. See Hacker (2006).

  7. 7.

    Nicholls and Rehm (2014) perform a similar decomposition that they explicitly interpret in terms of EI.

  8. 8.

    Note that we exclude current income as a control in the Bossert measure as this appears directly in the EI measure.

References

  • Alkire, S., & Foster, J. (2011). Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement. Journal of Public Economics, 95, 476–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvaredo, F., Atkinson, A., Piketty, T., & Saez, E. (2013). The top 1% in international and historical perspective. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27, 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A. (1970). On the measurement of inequality. Journal of Economic Theory, 2, 244–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, M., & Smith, T. (2011). Tobacco use as response to economic insecurity: Evidence from the national longitudinal survey of youth. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 9(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bossert, W., Clark, A., D’Ambrosio, C., & Lepinteur, A. (2019). Economic insecurity and the rise of the right (CEP Discussion Paper No. 1659).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bossert, W., & D’Ambrosio, C. (2013). Measuring economic insecurity. International Economic Review, 54, 1017–1030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breiding, M. J., Basile, K., Klevens, J., & Smith, S. (2017). Economic insecurity and intimate partner and sexual violence victimization. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 53, 457–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bucks, B. (2011). Economic vulnerability in the United States: Measurement and trends. Paper Prepared for the IARIW-OECD Conference on Economic Insecurity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burón, P., Jimenez-Trevino, L., Saiz, P., García-Portilla, M., Corcoran, P., Carli, V., Fekete, S., Hadlaczy, G., Hegerl, U., Michel, K., Sarchiapone, M., Wasserman, D., Schmidtke, A., & Bobes, J. (2016). Reasons for attempted suicide in Europe: Prevalence, associated factors, and risk of repetition. Archives of Suicide Research, 20, 45–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Case, A., & Deaton, A. (2015). Rising morbidity and mortality in midlife among white non-hispanic Americans in the 21st century. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 112(49), 15078–15083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Case, A., & Deaton, A. (2020). Deaths of despair and the future of capitalism. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Catalano, R. (1991). The health effects of economic insecurity. American Journal of Public Health, 81, 1148–1152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J. (1991). Response-order effects in likert-type scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51, 531–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Ambrosio, C., & Rohde, N. (2014). The distribution of economic insecurity: Italy and the U. S. over the great recession. Review of Income and Wealth, 60, S33–S52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, H. (1920). The measurement of the inequality of incomes. Economic Journal, 30, 348–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G., & Mantler, J. (2004). The consequences of financial stress for individuals, families and society. Centre for Research on Stress, Coping and Well-being.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dercon, S. (2006). Vulnerability: A micro perspective. In F. Bourguignon, B. Pleskovic, & J.  van der Gaag (Eds.), Securing development in an unstable world. World Bank publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottschalk, P., & Moffitt, R. (2009). Household risks: The rising instability of U.S. earnings. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23, 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, J. (2006). The great risk shift. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, J., Huber, G., Rehm, P., Schlesinger, M., & Valletta, R. (2011). Economic security at risk: Findings from the economic security index. Rockefeller Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, J., Rehm, P., & Schlesinger, M. (2013). The insecure American: Economic experiences, financial worries, and policy attitudes. Perspectives on Politics, 11, 23–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyslop, D., & Imbens, G. (2001). Bias from classical and other forms of measurement error. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 19, 475–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. (1977). The silent revolution: Changing values and political styles among western publics. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2016). Trump, Brexit, and the rise of populism: Economic have-nots and cultural backlash (HKS Working Paper No. RWP16–026).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kong, N., Osberg, L., & Zhou, W. (2019). The shattered “Iron Rice Bowl”: Intergenerational effects of Chinese state-owned enterprise reform. Journal of Health Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2019.06.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kopasker, D., Montagna, C., & Bender, K. (2018). Economic insecurity: A socioeconomic determinant of mental health. SSM—Population Health, 6, 184–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ligon, E., & Schechter, L. (2003). Measuring vulnerability. Economic Journal, 113(486), C95–C102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, A., & Rehm, P. (2014). Income risk in 30 countries. Review of Income and Wealth, 60, S98–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, G. (2010). Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Advances in Health Sciences Education Theory and Practice, 15, 625–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Offer, A., Pechey, R., & Ulijasazek, S. (2010). Obesity under affluence varies by welfare regimes: The effect of fast food, insecurity, and inequality. Economics and Human Biology, 8, 297–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osberg, L. (1998). Economic insecurity. Social Policy Research Centre, UNSW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osberg, L., & Sharpe, A. (2002). An index of economic well–being for selected OECD countries. Review of Income and Wealth, 48, 291–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osberg, L., & Sharpe, A. (2014). Measuring economic insecurity in rich and poor nations. Review of Income and Wealth, 60, 53–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravallion, M. (2011). On multidimensional indices of poverty. Journal of Economic Inequality, 9, 235–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richiardi, M., & He, Z. (2019). Measuring economic insecurity: A review of the literature. CeMPA WP 1/20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehm, P., Hacker, J., & Schlesinger, M. (2012). Insecure alliances: Risk, inequality, and support for the welfare state. American Political Science Review, 106, 386–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohde, N., & Tang, K. K. (2018). Economic insecurity: Theoretical approaches. In C. D’Ambrosio (Ed.), Handbook of research on economic and social well-being (pp. S300–S315). Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohde, N., Tang, K., D’Ambrosio, C., Osberg, L., & Rao, P. (2020). Welfare-based income insecurity in the US and Germany: Evidence from harmonized panel data. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 176, 226–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohde, N., Tang, K. K., Osberg, L., & Rao, P. (2016). The effect of economic insecurity on mental health: Recent evidence from Australian panel data. Social Science & Medicine, 151, 250–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romaguera‐de‐la‐Cruz, M. (2019). Measuring economic insecurity using a counting approach. an application to three EU countries. Review of Income and Wealth. https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12428

  • Ruhm, C. (2000). Are recessions good for your health? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 617–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. (2009). Reconciling psychology with economics: Obesity, behavioral biology, and rational overeating. Journal of Bioeconomics, 11, 249–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staudigel, M. (2016). A soft pillow for hard times? Economic insecurity, food intake and body weight in Russia. Journal of Health Economics, 50, 198–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J. (2009). Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. http://www.stiglitzsen-fitoussi.fr/en/index.htm

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, B. (2018). Does economic insecurity cause weight gain among Canadian labor force participants? Review of Income and Wealth, 64, 406–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, B., & Osberg, L. (2017). Healing and/or breaking? The mental health implications of repeated economic insecurity. Social Science and Medicine, 188, 119–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, B., Daley, A., Rohde, N., & Osberg, L. (2020). Blown off-course? Weight gain among the economically insecure during the great recession. Journal of Economic Psychology, In Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Prasada Rao for his ongoing support, and Alannah Pocknall for research assistance

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicholas Rohde .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rohde, N., D’Ambrosio, C., Watson, B. (2022). Empirical Methods for Modelling Economic Insecurity. In: Chotikapanich, D., Rambaldi, A.N., Rohde, N. (eds) Advances in Economic Measurement. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2023-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2023-3_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-2022-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-2023-3

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics