Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Traffic Demand Analysis Model for Land Redevelopment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Urban Redevelopment and Traffic Congestion Management Strategies

Part of the book series: Urban Sustainability ((US))

  • 193 Accesses

Abstract

Traffic demand forecasting is the basis of urban and traffic planning. The traffic demand analysis model of urban land redevelopment is the basic tool of redevelopment plan formulation, selection and evaluation, and is also the key technology of traffic congestion management under redevelopment. Effective technical tools can provide accurate traffic demand forecasting to fundamentally guarantee the reliability of planning and provide a strong support for the formulation of reasonable planning plan.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Xiao QS (1990) Urban transportation planning. China Communications Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  2. Black J (1981) Urban transport planning. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lu HP, Huang HJ (2007) Theoretical research frontiers in transportation planning. Tsinghua University Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ben-akiva ME, Lerman SR (1987) Discrete choice analysis: theory and application to travel demand. J Oper Res Soc 4:370–371

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hensher DA, Button KJ (2000) Handbook of transport modelling. Pergamon Press 6:546–546

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yin HH, Guan HZ, Qin HM et al (2010) Study of travel mode choice behavior based on disaggregate model. J Wuhan Univ Technol Transp Sci Eng 34(5):1000–1003

    Google Scholar 

  7. Guan HZ (2004) Disaggregate model: a tool for traffic behavior analysis. China Communications Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wegener M (1995) Current and future land use models. In: Travel model improvement program land use modeling, February 1995. 1995-01-01. Texas Transportation Institute, p 13–40

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wegener M (2004) Overview of land use transport models. Handbook of Transport Geography and Spatial System 5:127–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Webster FV, Bly PH, Paulley NJ et al (1988) Urban land-use and transport interaction: policies and models: report of the International Study Group on Land-use/Transport Interaction (ISGLUTI). Avebury

    Google Scholar 

  11. Harris B (1985) Urban simulation models in regional science. J Reg Sci 25(4):545–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mackett RL (1985) Integrated land use—transport models. Transp Rev 5(4):325–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Small KA, Benechman J (1988) Research policy and review 25. Modeling land use and transportation: an interpretive review for growth areas. Environ Plann A 20(10):1285–1309

    Google Scholar 

  14. Aoyama Y (1989) A historical review of transport and land-use models in Japan. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 23a (1):53–61

    Google Scholar 

  15. Horowitz A, Farmer D (1999) Statewide travel forecasting practice: a critical review. Transp Res Rec: J TRA 1685:13–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bowman JL, Ben-akiva ME (2001) Activity-based disaggregate travel demand model system with activity schedules. Transp Res Part A: Policy Pract 35(1):1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wilson AG (1998) Land-use/transport interaction models: past and future. JTEP 32(1):3–26

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mishra S, Ye X, Ducca F et al (2011) A functional integrated land use-transportation model for analyzing transportation impacts in the Maryland-Washington, DC Region. Sustain Sci, Prac Policy 7(2):60–69

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lu XM, Chen BZ, Dong ZG (2008) Conception and outcomes: the Shanghai comprehensive transportation model system. Urban Transp China 1:13–18

    Google Scholar 

  20. Li CY, Chen JC, Guo JF et al (2008) Selected urban transportation models. Urban Transp China 1:32–49

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pryor EG (1989) Urban land use and transport interaction policies and models: report of the International Study Group on Land Use/Transport Interaction (ISGLUTI). Land Use Policy 6(6):267–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Southworth F (1995) A technical review of urban land use—transportation models as tools for evaluating vehicle travel reduction strategies. Office of Scientific & Technical Information

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lu HP (2006) Theory and methods in transportation planning. Tsinghua University Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mao JX, Yan XP (2002) The mutual relationship between urban transport system and land use in China. Urban Planning Forum 4:34–37

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zhou SH, Yan XP (2005) Progress in the study of the relationship between urban traffic and land utilization at home and abroad. Planners 3:58–62

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zhu ZH, Yang DY, Wu B (2007) Urban agglomeration traffic planning. Tongji University Press, Shanghai  (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Yuan J (2007) Research on the generation and distribution prediction of intercity highway passenger traffic in urban agglomerations. Southwest Jiaotong University, Mater  (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Li J (2007) Research on disaggregated model and application of urban agglomeration rail transit mode division. Wuhan University of Technology, Mater  (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wang YL, Wu B, Dong Z et al (2016) A joint modeling analysis of passengers’ intercity travel destination and mode choices in Yangtze river delta megaregion of China. Mathematical Problems in Engineering

    Google Scholar 

  30. Horowitz A. (2006) Statewide travel forecasting models, vol 358. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  31. Algers S (1993) Integrated structure of long-distance travel behavior models in Sweden. Transp Res Rec 1413:141–149

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kang-soo K, Goyang-shi K, Hye-jin C et al (2005) National modeling for passenger trips. Korea Proc Eastern Asia Soc Transp Stud 5:2470–2482

    Google Scholar 

  33. O’Neill WA, Brown E (1999) Long-distance trip generation modeling using ATS. In: Conference Personal Travel, p 271–286

    Google Scholar 

  34. National Research Council (US) (2007) Committee for determination of the state of the practice in metropolitan area travel forecasting, transportation research board. metropolitan travel forecasting: current practice and future direction--Special Report 288. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  35. Erlander S, Stewart NF (1990) The gravity model in transportation analysis: theory and extensions. Vsp

    Google Scholar 

  36. De Dios Ortãozar J, WillumsenL G (2011) Modelling transport. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  37. Buerkert A, Bagayoko M, Bationo A et al (1998) Integration of an activity-based model system and a residential location model. Urban Studies 35(7):1131–1153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Fotheringham AS (1983) Some theoretical aspects of destination choice and their relevance to production-constrained gravity models. Environ Plan A 15(8):1121–1132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Bhat C, Govindarajan A, Pulugurta V (1998) Disaggregate attraction-end choice modeling: formulation and empirical analysis. Transp Res Record: J TRA 1645:60–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Pozsgay MA, Bhat CR (2001) Destination choice modeling for home-based recreational trips: analysis and implications for land use, transportation, and air quality planning. Transp Res Record J Tran 1777(1):47–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Cascetta E, Papola A (2001) Random utility models with implicit availability/perception of choice alternatives for the simulation of travel demand. Transp Res Part C: Emerg Technolog 9(4):249–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. He MW (2007) Research on disaggregated behavior model of urban residents’ choice of travel destination. Master, Kunming University of Science and Technology (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Mishra S, Wang Y, Zhu X et al (2013) Comparison between gravity and destination choice models for trip distribution in Maryland. In: Transportation Research Board 92nd Annual Meeting, No. 13-3196

    Google Scholar 

  44. Thill JC (1992) Choice set formation for destination choice modeling. Prog Hum Geogr 16(3):361–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Liu CQ (2001) Modern transportation planning. China Communications Press, Beijing  (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Zhou JP, Dai S (2012) Urban and metropolitan freight transportation: a quick review of existing models. J Transp Syst Eng Inf Technol 4:106–114

    Google Scholar 

  47. Dixit, Venigalla S, Bronzini MM et al (2011) A methodology for disaggregation of freight origin destination data for metropolitan and regional planning. In: Transportation Research Board 90th Annual Meeting

    Google Scholar 

  48. Kulpa T (2014) Freight truck trip generation modelling at regional level. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 111:197–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Wang Y, Ding C, Liu C et al (2013) An analysis of interstate freight mode choice between truck and rail: a case study of Maryland, United States. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 96:1239–1249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Pendyala RM (2002) Urban highway freight modeling including intermodal connectors for Florida, BC, 208

    Google Scholar 

  51. Hensher D, Figliozzi MA (2007) Behavioural insights into the modelling of freight transportation and distribution systems. Transp Res Part B Methodol 41(9):921–923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Jong GD, Ben-akiva M (2007) A micro-simulation model of shipment size and transport chain choice. Transp Res Part B Methodol 41(9):950–965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Beagan DF, Fischer MJ, Kuppam AR (2007) Quick response freight manual II, FHWA-HOP-08-010

    Google Scholar 

  54. Bureau OR (1964) Traffic assignment manual. Department of Commerce, Urban Planning Division, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  55. Manual HC (2007) Highway capacity manual. Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  56. Chen DD, Yang C (2010) Impedance functions of urban transportation networks for traffic assignment. Traffic & Transp 2:17–20

    Google Scholar 

  57. Bar-gera AH (2002) Origin-based algorithm for the traffic assignment problem. Transp Sci 36(4):398–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Dial RB (2006) A path-based user-equilibrium traffic assignment algorithm that obviates path storage and enumeration. Transp Res Part B: Methodol 40(10):917–936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Dial RB (2006) An efficient algorithm for building min-path trees for all origins in a multi-class network. Transp Res Part B: Method 40(10):851–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Ye X (2010) Accelerated procedure of multiclass highway traffic assignment for Maryland statewide transportation model. Transp Res Record: J TRA 2176:84–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Mishra S, Welch TF, Moeckel R et al (2013) Development of Maryland statewide transportation model and its application in scenario planning. In: Transportation Research Board 92nd Annual Meeting

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Tongji University, Shanghai, China

    Yanli Wang

  2. Tongji University, Shanghai, China

    Bing Wu

  3. Tongji University, Shanghai, China

    Linbo Li

Authors
  1. Yanli Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bing Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Linbo Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Tongji University Press

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wang, Y., Wu, B., Li, L. (2022). Traffic Demand Analysis Model for Land Redevelopment. In: Urban Redevelopment and Traffic Congestion Management Strategies. Urban Sustainability. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1727-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1727-1_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-1726-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-1727-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation