Abstract
In line with the sustainable trend in the construction industry worldwide, there have been a number of studies that examined risks in Green Building (GB) projects recently. This study aimed to assess risk factors that GB projects often face through a questionnaire survey with 69 GB practitioners in Vietnam. Notably, this study evaluated GB risk factors according to three features: likelihood occurrence, the magnitude of impact, and risk controllability. The results indicated the top five crucial risks are “Owners lacks determination”; “Lack of experience of designers about GB”; “Project managers lack experience in GB projects”; “Underestimation of initial investment cost”; and “Project managers lack design management experience”. This paper could be a helpful reference for the construction industry by providing a profoundly assessing GB projects’ risks. Additionally, this study contributes empirical research of risk assessment in GB projects in Vietnam. Therefore, this study may contribute to the development of sustainable trends in the construction industry worldwide.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Kientzel, J., Kok, G.: Environmental assessment methodologies for commercial buildings: an elicitation study of U.S. building professionals’ beliefs on leadership in energy and environmental design (LEED). Sustainability 3, 2392–2412 (2011). https://doi.org/10.3390/su3122392
Retzlaff, R.: Developing policies for green buildings: what can the United States learn from the Netherlands? Sustain. Sci. Pract. Policy 6, 28–38 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2010.11908040
Nguyen, H.D., Macchion, L.: Risk management in green building: a review of the current state of research and future directions. Environ Dev Sustain (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02168-y
Hassan, M.E., Kandil, A., Senouci, A., Al-Derham, H.: Organizational behavior attributes and sustainable construction adoption: an econometric analysis using data from Qatar. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 142, 05016016 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001196
Dodge-Data, Analytics: World Green Building Trends 2018: Smart Market Report. U.S. Green Building Council (2018)
Gan, X., Zuo, J., Ye, K., et al.: Why sustainable construction? Why not? An owner’s perspective. Habitat Int. 47, 61–68 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.01.005
Latham, M.: Constructing the team: final report of the government/industry review of procurement and contractual arrangements in the UK construction industry (1994)
Hwang, B.-G., Shan, M., Phua, H., Chi, S.: An exploratory analysis of risks in green residential building construction projects: the case of Singapore. Sustainability 9, 1116 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/su9071116
Hwang, B., Shan, M., Supa’at, N.N.B.: Green commercial building projects in Singapore: critical risk factors and mitigation measures. Sustain. Soc. 30, 237–247 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.01.020
Chapman, C., Ward, S.: Why risk efficiency is a key aspect of best practice projects. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 22, 619–632 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.05.001
Du, L., Tang, W., Liu, C., et al.: Enhancing engineer–procure–construct project performance by partnering in international markets: perspective from Chinese construction companies. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 34, 30–43 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.09.003
Zhao, X., Hwang, B.-G.G., Gao, Y.: A fuzzy synthetic evaluation approach for risk assessment: a case of Singapore’s green projects. J. Clean. Prod. 115, 203–213 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.042
Dikmen, I., Budayan, C., Talat Birgonul, M., Hayat, E.: Effects of risk attitude and controllability assumption on risk ratings: observational study on international construction project risk assessment. J. Manag. Eng. 34, 1–12 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000643
Tao, X., Xiang-Yuan, S.: Identification of risk in green building projects based on the perspective of sustainability. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, p. 32053 (2018)
Qin, X., Mo, Y., Jing, L.: Risk perceptions of the life-cycle of green buildings in China. J. Clean. Prod. 126, 148–158 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.103
Ismael, D., Shealy, T.: Sustainable construction risk perceptions in the Kuwaiti construction industry. Sustainability 10, 1854 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061854
Rafindadi, A.D., Mikić, M., Kovačić, I., Cekić, Z.: Global perception of sustainable construction project risks. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 119, 456–465 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.051
Ranawaka, I., Mallawaarachchi, H.: A risk-responsive framework for green retrofit projects in Sri Lanka. Built Environ. Proj. Asset. Manag. 8, 477–490 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-10-2017-0088
Yang, R.J., Zou, P.X.W.W., Wang, J.: Modelling stakeholder-associated risk networks in green building projects. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 34, 66–81 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.09.010
El-Sayegh, S.M., Manjikian, S., Ibrahim, A., et al.: Risk identification and assessment in sustainable construction projects in the UAE. Int. J. Constr. Manag. 21, 327–336 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2018.1536963
Guan, L., Abbasi, A., Ryan, M.J.: Analyzing green building project risk interdependencies using interpretive structural modeling. J. Clean. Prod. 256,120372 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120372
Nguyen, H.D., Do, Q.N.H., Macchion, L.: Influence of practitioners’ characteristics on risk assessment in Green Building projects in emerging economies: a case of Vietnam. Eng. Constr. Architect. Manage. (2021, ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-05-2021-0436
Krechowicz, M.: Effective risk management in innovative projects: a case study of the construction of energy-efficient, sustainable building of the laboratory of intelligent building in Cracow. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, p. 62006. IOP Publishing, Bristol, UK (2017)
Chan, A.P.C.C., Darko, A., Ameyaw, E.E., Owusu-Manu, D.-G.G.: Barriers affecting the adoption of green building technologies. J. Manag. Eng. 33, 4016057 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000507
Zhao, X., Hwang, B.-G., See, Y.L.: Green retrofit projects: risk assessment and mitigation. In: Thirty-First Annual Conference 7–9 September 2015, p. 125 (2015)
Hwang, B.-G., Zhao, X., See, Y.L., Zhong, Y.: Addressing risks in green retrofit projects: the case of Singapore. Proj. Manag. J. 46, 76–89 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21512
Polat, G., Turkoglu, H., Gurgun, A.P.: Identification of material-related risks in green buildings. Procedia Eng. 196, 956–963 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.08.036
Taroun, A.: Towards a better modelling and assessment of construction risk: insights from a literature review. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 32, 101–115 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.03.004
Nunnally, J.C.: Psychometric Theory 3E. Tata McGraw-Hill Education, New York (1994)
Acknowledgments
The research is funded by the Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Padova e Rovigo.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Nguyen, H.D., Do, Q.N.H., Macchion, L. (2022). Assessing Risk Factors in the Implementation of Green Building Projects: Empirical Research from Vietnam. In: Ujikawa, K., Ishiwatari, M., Hullebusch, E.v. (eds) Environment and Sustainable Development. ACESD 2021. Environmental Science and Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1704-2_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1704-2_24
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-1703-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-1704-2
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)