Skip to main content

Visualizing Student Engagement and Performance in Online Course: A Step to Smart Learning Environment

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of Seventh International Congress on Information and Communication Technology

Abstract

Students’ Engagement and Performance (EP) of online courses are analyzed and visualized in order to assist instructors in improving student’s performance at an early stage before the end of the academic semester. A fully online course for undergraduate students in the Department of Information Studies, College of Education, Sultan Qaboos University (SQU), was conducted. The total number of students in the course was 38. Students studied each course module and the instructor evaluated them based on a set of assessments. This paper explores the existence of possible relationships between student’s engagement and performance. In this paper, the authors only considered the results of the Mid Term Exam part. They extracted the necessary data for analysis purposes for the above-mentioned factors from the log file of the course. The results revealed promising relationships between the student’s engagement and performance. This indicates the importance of conducting this kind of case study as a step forward to achieve a smart learning environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Al-Kindi I, Al-Khanjari Z (2019) The smart learning management system (SLMS). In: Free and open-source software conference (FOSSC-2019), February 8–9, Sultanate of Oman (Muscat). ISSN: 1813–419X (2019). https://fossc.om/2019/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Proceedings.pdf#page=32

  2. Spector J (2017) Conceptualizing the emerging field of smart learning environments. Smart Learn Environ 1(1):2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-014-0002-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nikolov R, Shoikova E, Krumova M, Kovatcheva E, Dimitrov V, Shikalanov A (2016) Learning in a smart city environment. J Commun Comput 13:338–350 (2016). https://doi.org/10.17265/1548-7709/2016.07.003

  4. Nakayama M, Mutsuura K, Yamamoto H (2014) Impact of learner's characteristics and learning behaviour on learning performance during a fully online course. Electron J e-Learn 12(4):394–408 (2014). https://www.academic-publishing.org/index.php/ejel/article/view/1708/1671

  5. Young M, Robinson S, Alberts P (2009) Students pay attention! Combating the vigilance decrement to improve learning during lectures. Act Learn High Educ 10(1):41–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787408100194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yassine S, Kadry S, Sicilia M (2016) Measuring learning outcomes effectively in smart learning environments. In: 2016 smart solutions for future cities, February 7–9, Kuwait. IEEE, pp 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/SSFC.2016.7447877

  7. Bhagat K, Wu L, Chang C (2019) The impact of personality on students’ perceptions towards online learning. Austral J Educ Technol 35(4) (2019). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.4162

  8. Shahzadi E, Ahmad Z (2011) A study on academic performance of university students. In: Eighth international conference on recent advances in statistics “statistics, biostatistics and econometrics, February 8–9, Lahore, Pakistan, pp 255–268. http://www.isoss.net/downloads/proc%208th%20.pdf#page=268

  9. Chen C, Meng X (2021) Exploring the relationship between student behavioral patterns and learning outcomes in a SPOC. Int J Distance Educ Technol (IJDET) 19(1):35–49. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJDET.2021010103

  10. Bergdahl N, Nouri J, Fors U, Knutsson O (2020) Engagement, disengagement and performance when learning with technologies in upper secondary school. Comput Educ 149:103783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Galikyan I, Admiraal W (2019) Students’ engagement in asynchronous online discussion: the relationship between cognitive presence, learner prominence, and academic performance. Internet Higher Educ 43:100692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nguyen T, Cannata M, Miller J (2018) Understanding student behavioral engagement: importance of student interaction with peers and teachers. J Educ Res 111(2):163–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2016.1220359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Martin F, Bolliger D (2018) Engagement matters: student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learn 22(1):205–222. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092

  14. Liang K, Zhang Y, He Y, Zhou Y, Tan W, Li X (2017) Online behavior analysis-based student profile for intelligent E-learning. J Electr Comput Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9720396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Al-Kindi I, Al-Khanjari Z (2020) A novel architecture of SQU SMART LMS: the new horizon for SMART City in Oman. In: 2020 third international conference on smart systems and inventive technology (ICSSIT). IEEE, pp 751–756. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSSIT48917.2020.9214141

  16. Al-Kindi I, Al-Khanjari Z, Al-Salmi J (2020) Managing the triangular bond of the EBP for SQU students through the proposed test model. Int J Eng Adv Technol (IJEAT) 1(1):391–400. ISSN 2249-8958. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijeat.A1914.1010120

  17. Al-Khanjari Z, Al-Kindi I (2020) Proposing the ebp smart predictive model towards smart learning environment. J Talent Dev Excell 12(2s):2422–2438. https://iratde.com/index.php/jtde/article/view/959

  18. Lavrakas P (2008) Percentile. Encyclopedia of survey research methods. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963947.n373. Retrieved from: https://methods.sagepub.com/reference/encyclopedia-of-survey-research-methods/n373.xml. Last accessed: 10 Jan 2021

  19. Al-Kindi I, Al-Khanjari Z (2021) Exploring factors and indicators for measuring students’ performance in moodle learning environment. Int J Emerg Technol Learn 16(12). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i12.22049

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their gratitude to Sultan Qaboos University's College of Science and Computer Science. Prof. Zuhoor Al-Khanjari is supervising this project, which is funded by a Doctoral Program scholarship from Sultan Qaboos University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iman Al-Kindi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Al-Kindi, I., Al-Khanjari, Z. (2023). Visualizing Student Engagement and Performance in Online Course: A Step to Smart Learning Environment. In: Yang, XS., Sherratt, S., Dey, N., Joshi, A. (eds) Proceedings of Seventh International Congress on Information and Communication Technology. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 448. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1610-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1610-6_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-1609-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-1610-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics