Abstract
Risk matrix is essentially a qualitative risk assessment tool, and thus the design of risk matrix highly relies on person’s subjectivity. This kind of subjectivity reflects a decision maker’s perception towards a risk. In this chapter, we identify several kinds of risk perception in risk matrix that affect the final risk judgement and analyze their effect on risk matrix design.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ale B, Burnap P, Slater D (2015) On the origin of PCDS—(probability consequence diagrams). Saf Sci 72:229–239
Aven T (2012) The risk concept—historical and recent development trends. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 99:33–44
Ball DJ, Watt J (2013) Further thoughts on the utility of risk matrices. Risk Anal 33(11):2068–2078
Bao CB, Li JP, Wu DS (2018) A fuzzy mapping framework for risk aggregation based on risk matrices. J Risk Res 21(5):539–561
Bedford T (2013) Decision making for group risk reduction: dealing with epistemic uncertainty. Risk Anal 33(10):1884–1898
Booth L, Nelson R (2014) The perception of chronic and acute risks in the Northern Ireland fishing industry. Saf Sci 68:41–46
Burns WJ, Slovic P (2012) Risk perception and behaviors: anticipating and responding to crises. Risk Anal 32(4):579–582
Chen QS, Gao ZJ, Wang ZY (2020) Operational tool on rapid risk assessment methodology from European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control: an introduction. China J Public Health 36(2):254–256
Cook R (2008) Simplifying the creation and use of the risk matrix. In: 16th safety-critical systems symposium, Bristol, England
Cox LA (2008) What’s wrong with risk matrices? Risk Anal 28(2):497–512
Duijm NJ (2015) Recommendations on the use and design of risk matrices. Saf Sci 76:21–31
Fischhoff B et al (1978) How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. Policy Sci 9(2):127–152
Goerlandt F, Reniers G (2016) On the assessment of uncertainty in risk diagrams. Saf Sci 84:67–77
Goerlandt F, Reniers G (2017) An approach for reconciling different perspectives and stakeholder views on risk ranking. J Clean Prod 149:1219–1232
Iec I (2009) Risk management-risk assessment techniques
Levine ES (2012) Improving risk matrices: the advantages of logarithmically scaled axes. J Risk Res 15(2):209–222
Li JP, Bao CB, Wu DS (2018) How to design rating schemes of risk matrices: a sequential updating approach. Risk Anal 38(1):99–117
Ni HH, Chen A, Chen N (2010) Some extensions on risk matrix approach. Saf Sci 48(10):1269–1278
Payne SLB (2014) The art of asking questions: studies in public opinion, 3. Princeton University Press
Pickering A, Cowley SP (2010) Risk matrices: implied accuracy and false assumptions. J Health Saf Res Pract 2(1):9–16
Rankavat S, Tiwari G (2016) Pedestrians risk perception of traffic crash and built environment features—Delhi, India. Saf Sci 87:1–7
Rosenstock IM (1974) Historical origins of the health belief model. Health Educ Monogr 2(4):328–335
Rundmo T, Nordfjærn T (2017) Does risk perception really exist? Saf Sci 93:230–240
Slovic P (1987) Perception of Risk. Science 236(4799):280–285
Smith ED, Siefert WT, Drain D (2009) Risk matrix input data biases. Syst Eng 12(4):344–360
Taylor WD, Snyder LA (2017) The influence of risk perception on safety: a laboratory study. Saf Sci 95:116–124
Thomas P, Bratvold RB, Eric BJ (2014) The risk of using risk matrices. SPE Econ Manage 6(2):56–66
Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8(3):338–353
Zhao D et al (2016) Stakeholder perceptions of risk in construction. Saf Sci 82:111–119
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bao, C., Li, J., Wu, D. (2022). Risk Perceptions in Risk Matrix: Sources and Impact to Risk Matrix Design. In: Risk Matrix. Innovation in Risk Analysis. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1480-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1480-5_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-1479-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-1480-5
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)