Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Soft Topology with Multi-attribute Decision-Making

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Sets

Abstract

In this chapter, the idea of q-rung orthopair fuzzy soft sets is extended to introduce the notion of q-rung orthopair fuzzy soft topology together with some interesting results. Certain properties of q-rung orthopair fuzzy soft topology are investigated for their practical applications in multi-attribute decision-making. For these objectives, grey relational analysis, generalized choice value method, and aggregation operators-based technique are proposed to address q-rung orthopair fuzzy soft uncertain information. Numerical examples of these methods are also presented from real-life situations. The validity and efficiency of proposed methods are analysed by their performing comparative analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. L.A. Zadeh, Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8, 338–356 (1965)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Z. Pawlak, Rough sets. Int. J. Comput. Inf. Sci. 11, 341–356 (1982)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. D. Molodtsov, Soft set theory-first results. Comput. Math. Appl. 37(4–5), 19–31 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. K.T. Atanassov, Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, in: VII ITKRs Session, Sofia, June 1983, ed. by V. Sgurev. (Central Sci. and Techn. Library, Bulg. Academy of Sciences, 1984)

    Google Scholar 

  5. K.T. Atanassov, Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 20(1), 87–96 (1986)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. K.T. Atanassov, Geometrical interpretation of the elements of the intuitionistic fuzzy objects. Int. J. Bioautom. 20(S1), S27–S42 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Z.S. Xu, Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 15(6), 1179–1187 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Z.S. Xu, R.R. Yager, Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Int. J. Gen Syst 35(4), 417–433 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. H. Zhao, Z.S. Xu, M.F. Ni, S.S. Lui, Generalized aggregation operators for intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 25(1), 1–30 (2010)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. R. R. Yager, Pythagorean fuzzy subsets, in IFSA World Congress and NAFIPS Annual Meeting 2013 Joint, Edmonton, Canada I(EEE, 2013), pp. 57–61

    Google Scholar 

  11. R.R. Yager, Pythagorean membership grades in multi-criteria decision making. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 22(4), 958–965 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. R.R. Yager, A.M. Abbasov, Pythagorean membership grades, complex numbers, and decision making. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 28(5), 436–452 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. R.R. Yager, Generalized orthopair fuzzy sets. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 25(5), 1220–1230 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. M.I. Ali, Another view on q-rung orthopair fuzzy sets. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 33(5), 2139–2153 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. A. Aygunoglu, V. Cetkin, H. Aygun, An introduction to fuzzy soft topological spaces. Hacet. J. Math. Stat. 43(2), 193–204 (2014)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. N. Çağman, S. Karataş, S. Enginoglu, Soft topology. Comput. Math. Appl. 62(1), 351–358 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. M. Shabir, M. Naz, On soft topological spaces. Comput. Math. Appl. 61(7), 1786–1799 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. B. Ahmad, S. Hussain, On some structures of soft topology. Math. Sci. 6(64), 1–7 (2012)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. S. Roy, T.K. Samanta, A note on a soft topological space. Punjab Univ. J. Math. 46(1), 19–24 (2014)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. H. Hazra, P. Majumdar, S.K. Samanta, Soft topology. Fuzzy Inf. Eng. 4(1), 105–115 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12543-012-0104-2

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. B.P. Varol, A. Shostak, H. Aygun, A new approach to soft topology. Hacet. J. Math. Stat. 41(5), 731–741 (2012)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. M. Riaz, S.T. Tehrim, On bipolar fuzzy soft topology with application. Soft. Comput. 24(24), 18259–18272 (2020)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. M. Riaz, N. Çağman, I. Zareef, M. Aslam, N-soft topology and its applications to multi-criteria group decision making. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 36(6), 6521–6536 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. M. Riaz, M.A. Razzaq, M. Aslam, D. Pamucar, M-parameterized N-soft topology-based TOPSIS approach for multi-attribute decision making. Symmetry 13(5), 1–31 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. M.R. Hashmi, M. Riaz, F. Smarandache, \(m\)-polar neutrosophic topology with applications to multi-criteria decision-making in medical diagnosis and clustering analysis. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 22(1), 273–292 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. M. Riaz, B. Davvaz, A. Fakhar, A. Firdous, Hesitant fuzzy soft topology and its applications to multi-attribute group decision-making. Soft. Comput. 24(21), 16269–16289 (2020)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. M. Riaz, K. Naeem, M. Aslam, D. Afzal, F.A.A. Ahmed, S.S. Jamal, Multi-criteria group decision making with Pythagorean fuzzy soft topology. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 39(5), 6703–6720 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Z. Li, R. Cui, On the topological structure of intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets. Ann. Fuzzy Math. Inform. 5(1), 229–239 (2013)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. I. Osmanoglu, D. Tokat, On intuitionistic fuzzy soft topology. Gen. Math. Notes 19(2), 59–70 (2013)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. S. Eraslan, F. Karaaslan, A group decision making method based on TOPSIS under fuzzy soft environment. J. New Theory 3, 30–40 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  31. M. Akram, G. Ali, Hybrid models for decision-making based on rough Pythagorean fuzzy bipolar soft information. Granul. Comput. 5(1), 1–15 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. M. Akram, M. Arshad, A novel trapezoidal bipolar fuzzy TOPSIS method for group decision-making. Group Decis. Negot. 28(3), 565–584 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. M. Akram, A. Adeel, Novel TOPSIS method for group decision-making based on hesitant m-polar fuzzy model. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 37(6), 8077–8096 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. F. Feng, Y.B. Jun, X. Liu, L. Li, An adjustable approach to fuzzy soft set based decision making. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 234(1), 10–20 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. F. Feng, C. Li, B. Davvaz, M.I. Ali, Soft sets combined with fuzzy sets and rough sets, a tentative approach. Soft. Comput. 14(9), 899–911 (2010)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. K. Kumar, H. Garg, TOPSIS method based on the connection number of set pair analysis under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy set environment. Comput. Appl. Math. 37(2), 1319–1329 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. H. Garg, A new generalized Pythagorean fuzzy information aggregation using Einstein operations and its application to decision making. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 31(9), 886–920 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. H. Garg, Generalized Pythagorean fuzzy geometric aggregation operators using Einstein t-norm and t-conorm for multicriteria decision-making process. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 32(16), 597–630 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. X.D. Peng, G. Selvachandran, Pythagorean fuzzy set: state of the art and future directions. Artif. Intell. Rev. 52, 1873–1927 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. X.D. Peng, Y. Yang, Some results for Pythagorean fuzzy sets. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 30(11), 1133–1160 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  41. X.D. Peng, L. Liu, Information measures for q-rung orthopair fuzzy sets. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 34(8), 1795–1834 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  42. X.D. Peng, Y.Y. Yang, J. Song, Y. Jiang, Pythagorean fuzzy soft set and its application. Comput. Eng. 41(7), 224–229 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  43. L. Zhang, J. Zhan, Fuzzy soft \(\beta \)-covering based fuzzy rough sets and corresponding decision-making applications. Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybern. 10, 1487–1502 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. L. Zhang, J. Zhan, J.C.R. Alcantud, Novel classes of fuzzy soft \(\beta \)-coverings-based fuzzy rough sets with applications to multi-criteria fuzzy group decision making. Soft. Comput. 23, 5327–5351 (2019)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. J. Zhan, Q. Liu, T. Herawan, A novel soft rough set: soft rough hemirings and its multicriteria group decision making. Appl. Soft Comput. 54, 393–402 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. J. Zhan, M.I. Ali, N. Mehmood, On a novel uncertain soft set model: Z-soft fuzzy rough set model and corresponding decision making methods. Appl. Soft Comput. 56, 446–457 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. X.L. Zhang, Z.S. Xu, Extension of TOPSIS to multiple criteria decision making with Pythagorean fuzzy sets. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 29(12), 1061–1078 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. H. Garg, CN-q-ROFS: connection number-based q-rung orthopair fuzzy set and their application to decision-making process. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 36(7), 3106–3143 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Z. Yang, H. Garg, Interaction power partitioned maclaurin symmetric mean operators under q-rung orthopair uncertain linguistic information. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 1–19 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-021-01062-5

  50. H. Garg, A new possibility degree measure for interval-valued q-rung orthopair fuzzy sets in decision-making. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 36(1), 526–557 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. P. He, C. Li, H. Garg, J. Liu, Z. Yang, X. Guo, A q-rung orthopair cloud-based multi-attribute decision-making algorithm: considering the information error and multilayer heterogeneous relationship of attributes. IEEE Access 9, 132541–132557 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3114330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. P. Liu, P. Wang, Some q-rung orthopair fuzzy aggregation operator and their application to multi-attribute decision making. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 33(2), 259–280 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Z. Liu, S. Wang, P. Liu, Multiple attribute group decision making based on q-rung orthopair fuzzy Heronian mean operators. J. Intell. Syst. 33(12), 2341–2363 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. H. Garg, A novel trigonometric operation-based q-rung orthopair fuzzy aggregation operator and its fundamental properties. Neural Comput. Appl. 32, 15077–15099 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. H. Garg, New exponential operation laws and operators for interval-valued q-rung orthopair fuzzy sets in group decision making process. Neural Comput. Appl. 33(20), 13937–13963 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06036-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. P. Liu, J. Liu, Some q-rung orthopair fuzzy Bonferroni mean operators and their application to multi-attribute group decision making. J. Intell. Syst. 33(2), 315–347 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. M. Akram, A. Khan, J.C.R. Alcantud, G. Santos-Garcia, A hybrid decision-making framework under complex spherical fuzzy prioritized weighted aggregation operators. Expert. Syst. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.12712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. M. Akram, N. Yaqoob, G. Ali, W. Chammam, Extensions of Dombi aggregation operators for decision making under \(m\)-polar fuzzy information. J. Math. 6, 1–20 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4739567

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  59. H.M.A. Farid, M. Riaz, Some generalized q-rung orthopair fuzzy Einstein interactive geometric aggregation operators with improved operational laws. Int. J. Intell. Syst. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. M. Riaz, H. Garg, H.M.A. Farid, M. Aslam, Novel q-rung orthopair fuzzy interaction aggregation operators and their application to low-carbon green supply chain management. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 41(2), 4109–4126 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-210506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. M. Riaz, H.M.A. Farid, F. Karaaslan, M.R. Hashmi, Some q-rung orthopair fuzzy hybrid aggregation operators and TOPSIS method for multi-attribute decision-making. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 39(1), 1227–1241 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. M. Riaz, K. Naeem, R. Chinram, A. Iampan, Pythagorean m-polar fuzzy weighted aggregation operators and algorithm for the investment strategic decision making. J. Math. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6644994

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  63. K. Naeem, M. Riaz, X.D. Peng, D. Afzal, Pythagorean fuzzy soft MCGDM methods based on TOPSIS, VIKOR and aggregation operators. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 37(5), 6937–6957 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. K. Naeem, M. Riaz, F. Karaaslan, A mathematical approach to medical diagnosis via Pythagorean fuzzy soft TOPSIS, VIKOR and generalized aggregation operators. Complex Intell. Syst. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-021-00458-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mathematics & Statistics, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan

    Muhammad Tahir Hamid

  2. Department of Mathematics, University of the Punjab Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan

    Muhammad Riaz

  3. Department of Mathematics, FG Degree College, Lahore Cantt., Lahore, Pakistan

    Khalid Naeem

Authors
  1. Muhammad Tahir Hamid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Muhammad Riaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Khalid Naeem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The authors contributed to each part of this paper equally.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Riaz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, Patiala, Punjab, India

    Harish Garg

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hamid, M.T., Riaz, M., Naeem, K. (2022). q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Soft Topology with Multi-attribute Decision-Making. In: Garg, H. (eds) q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Sets. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1449-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation