Skip to main content

MARCOS Technique by Using q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Sets for Evaluating the Performance of Insurance Companies in Terms of Healthcare Services

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Sets
  • 280 Accesses

Abstract

Evaluating and ranking confidential fitness assurance enterprises gives assurance organizations, assurance clients, and agencies a consistent mechanism for the coverage of decision-making methods. Additionally, since the planet's coverage region hurts from a gap of assessment of confidential fitness coverage enterprises through the COVID-19 epidemic, the necessity for a consistent, effective, and complete decision instrument is understandable. Appropriately, this manuscript wants to discover coverage corporations’ important ranking in conditions of health care public services in Pakistan through the COVID-19 epidemic across a multi-criteria implementation assessment method. In this study, options are assessed and then ranked as per seven principles and evaluations of five specialists. Specialists’ assessments and evaluations are completed of ambiguities, under the Measurement of Alternatives and Ranking according to the Compromise Solution (MARCOS) by using the q-rung orthopair fuzzy circumstances. Ultimately, a complete compassion assessment is presented to confirm the future method's permanence and efficiency. The announced methodology met the coverage evaluation dilemma through the COVID-19 pandemic extremely reasonable approach by using the compassion assessment conclusions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. L.A. Zadeh, Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8(3), 338–353 (1965)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. D. Ramot, R. Milo, M. Friedman, A. Kandel, Complex fuzzy sets. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 10(2), 171–186 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. P. Liu, Z. Ali, T. Mahmood, The distance measures and cross-entropy are based on complex fuzzy sets and their application in decision-making. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 39(3), 3351–3374 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. D.A. Chiang, N.P. Lin, Correlation of fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 102(2), 221–226 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. J.G. Brown, A note on fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 18(1), 32–39 (1971)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. V. Torra, Hesitant fuzzy sets. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 25(6), 529–539 (2010)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. T. Mahmood, A novel approach towards bipolar soft sets and their applications. J. Math. 2020(4690808), 2020 (2020)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. K. Atanassov, Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 20(1), 87–96 (1986)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. K.T. Atanassov, Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 31(3), 343–349 (1989)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. M. Xia, Z. Xu, B. Zhu, Some issues on intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators based on Archimedean t-conorm and t-norm. Knowl.-Based Syst. 31, 78–88 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. H. Garg, K. Kumar, A novel exponential distance and its based TOPSIS method for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets using connection number of SPA theory. Artif. Intell. Rev. 53(1), 595–624 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. H. Garg, A new generalized improved score function of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and applications in expert systems. Appl. Soft Comput. 38, 988–999 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. H. Garg, D. Rani, Novel similarity measure based on the transformed right-angled triangles between intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their applications. Cogn. Comput. 13(2), 447–465 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. P.A. Ejegwa, I.C. Onyeke, V. Adah, An algorithm for an improved intuitionistic fuzzy correlation measure with the medical diagnostic application. Ann. Optim. Theory Pract. 3(3), 51–66 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. Sanam, A. Saleem, Y. Muhammad, Some induced generalized Einstein aggregating operators and their application to group decision-making problems using intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. Ann. Optim. Theory Pract. 3(3), 15–49 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. Kar, A. Shaw, B. Das, An alternative approach to finding the optimal solution of assignment problem using Hungarian method by trapezoidal intuitionistic type-2 fuzzy data. Ann. Optim. Theory Pract. 3(3), 155–173 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  17. K.B.S.K. De, Decision-making under intuitionistic fuzzy metric distances. Ann. Optim. Theory Pract. 3(2), 49–64 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. Fahmi, F. Amin, S.B. Shah, Geometric operators are based on the linguistic interval-valued intuitionistic neutrosophic fuzzy number and their application in decision making. Ann. Optim. Theory Pract. 3(1), 47–71 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  19. R.R. Yager, Pythagorean membership grades in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 22(4), 958–965 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. B. Sarkar, A. Biswas, Pythagorean fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS integrated approach for transportation management through a new distance measure. Soft Comput. 25(5), 4073–4089 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. R.M. Zulqarnain, I. Siddique, F. Jarad, R. Ali, T. Abdeljawad, Development of TOPSIS technique under Pythagorean fuzzy hypersoft environment based on correlation coefficient and its application towards the selection of antivirus mask in COVID-19 pandemic. Complexity 2021, 6634991 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Y. Tang, Y. Yang, Sustainable e-bike sharing recycling supplier selection: an interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy MAGDM method based on preference information technology. J. Clean. Prod. 287, 125530–125543 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. A. Çalık, A novel Pythagorean fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methodology for green supplier selection in the Industry 4.0 era. Soft Comput. 25(3), 2253–2265 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  24. G. Bakioglu, A.O. Atahan, AHP integrated TOPSIS and VIKOR methods with Pythagorean fuzzy sets to prioritize risks in self-driving vehicles. Appl. Soft Comput. 99, 106948–106961 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. P. Ejegwa, S. Wen, Y. Feng, W. Zhang, N. Tang, Novel Pythagorean fuzzy correlation measures via Pythagorean fuzzy deviation, variance, and covariance with applications to pattern recognition and career placement. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2021.3063794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. B. Batool, S.S. Abosuliman, S. Abdullah, S. Ashraf, EDAS method for decision support modeling under the Pythagorean probabilistic hesitant fuzzy aggregation information. J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput. 1–14 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-021-03181-1

  27. H. Garg, Linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy sets and their applications in the multiattribute decision-making process. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 33(6), 1234–1263 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. H. Garg, Novel correlation coefficients between Pythagorean fuzzy sets and their applications to decision-making processes. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 31(12), 1234–1252 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. R.R. Yager, Generalized orthopair fuzzy sets. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 25(5), 1222–1230 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. H. Garg, A new possibility degree measure for interval-valued q-rung orthopair fuzzy sets in decision-making. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 36(1), 526–557 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. T. Mahmood, Z. Ali, Entropy measure and TOPSIS method based on correlation coefficient using complex q-rung orthopair fuzzy information and its application to multi-attribute decision making. Soft Comput. 25(2), 1249–1275 (2021)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. M. Riaz, M.T. Hamid, D. Afzal, D. Pamucar, Y.M. Chu, Multi-criteria decision making in robotic agri-farming with q-rung orthopair m-polar fuzzy sets. PLoS ONE 16(2), e0246485 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Y. Liu, G. Wei, S. Abdullah, J. Liu, L. Xu, H. Liu, Banzhaf–Choquet-copula-based aggregation operators for managing q-rung orthopair fuzzy information. Soft. Comput. 25(10), 6891–6914 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. T. Mahmood, Z. Ali, A novel approach of complex q-rung orthopair fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators and their application for cleaner production assessment in gold mines. J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput. 12, 8933–8959 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. A. Pınar, B.D. Rouyendegh, Y.S. Özdemir, q-Rung orthopair fuzzy TOPSIS method for green supplier selection problem. Sustainability 13, 985–1003 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Z. Ali, T. Mahmood, Maclaurin symmetric mean operators and their applications in the environment of complex q-rung orthopair fuzzy sets. Comput. Appl. Math. 39, 1–27 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. C. Jana, G. Muhiuddin, M. Pal, Some Dombi aggregation of Q-rung orthopair fuzzy numbers in multiple-attribute decision making. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 34(12), 3220–3240 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ž Stević, D. Pamučar, A. Puška, P. Chatterjee, Sustainable supplier selection in healthcare industries using a new MCDM method: Measurement of Alternatives and Ranking according to COmpromise Solution (MARCOS). Comput. Ind. Eng. 140, 106231–106247 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. M. Bakır, Ö. Atalık, Application of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy MARCOS approach for the evaluation of E-service quality in the airline industry. Decis. Mak. Appl. Manag. Eng. 4(1), 127–152 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. E. Celik, M. Gul, Hazard identification, risk assessment, and control for dam construction safety using an integrated BWM and MARCOS approach under interval type-2 fuzzy sets environment. Autom. Constr. 127, 103699–103719 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. M. Stanković, Ž Stević, D.K. Das, M. Subotić, D. Pamučar, A new fuzzy MARCOS method for road traffic risk analysis. Mathematics 8(3), 457–471 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. F. Ecer, D. Pamucar, MARCOS technique under intuitionistic fuzzy environment for determining the COVID-19 pandemic performance of insurance companies in terms of healthcare services. Appl. Soft Comput. 104, 107199–107218 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. T.P. Velavan, C.G. Meyer, The COVID-19 epidemic. Tropical Med. Int. Health 25(3), 278–299 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. M.S. Yang, Z. Ali, T. Mahmood, Complex q-rung orthopair uncertain linguistic partitioned Bonferroni mean operators with application in antivirus mask selection. Symmetry 13(2), 249–268 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. S. Zeng, Y. Xiao, TOPSIS method for intuitionistic fuzzy multiple-criteria decision making and its application to investment selection. Kybernetes 45, 282–296 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  46. M. Riaz, M.R. Hashmi, Linear Diophantine fuzzy set and its applications towards multi-attribute decision-making problems. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 37(4), 5417–5439 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. M. Riaz, M.R. Hashmi, H. Kalsoom, D. Pamucar, Y.M. Chu, Linear Diophantine fuzzy soft rough sets for the selection of sustainable material handling equipment. Symmetry 12(8), 1215–1237 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. M. Riaz, M.R. Hashmi, D. Pamucar, Y.M. Chu, Spherical linear Diophantine fuzzy sets with modeling uncertainties in MCDM. Comput. Model. Eng. Sci. 126(3), 1125–1164 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Z. Ali, T. Mahmood, M.S. Yang, TOPSIS method based on complex spherical fuzzy sets with Bonferroni mean operators. Mathematics 8(10), 1739–1753 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. M. Ali, F. Smarandache, Complex neutrosophic set. Neural Comput. Appl. 28(7), 1817–1834 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. L.Q. Dat, N.T. Thong, M. Ali, F. Smarandache, M. Abdel-Basset, H.V. Long, Linguistic approaches to interval complex neutrosophic sets in decision making. IEEE Access 7, 38902–38917 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. S.G. Quek, S. Broumi, G. Selvachandran, A. Bakali, M. Talea, F. Smarandache, Some results on the graph theory for complex neutrosophic sets. Symmetry 10(6), 190–211 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. C. Jana, G. Muhiuddin, M. Pal, Multiple-attribute decision-making problems based on SVTNH methods. J. Ambient. Intell. Humaniz. Comput. 11(9), 3717–3733 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. G. Shahzadi, G. Muhiuddin, M. Arif Butt, A. Ashraf, Hamacher interactive hybrid weighted averaging operators under Fermatean fuzzy numbers. J. Math. 2021, 5556017 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  55. H. Garg, CN-q-ROFS: connection number-based q-rung orthopair fuzzy set and their application to the decision-making process. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 36(7), 3106–3143 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. H. Garg, S.M. Chen, Multiattribute group decision-making based on neutrality aggregation operators of q-rung orthopair fuzzy sets. Inf. Sci. 517, 427–447 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  57. H. Garg, New exponential operation laws and operators for interval-valued q-rung orthopair fuzzy sets in the group decision-making process. Neural Comput. Appl. 33(20), 13937–13963 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06036-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. M. Riaz, H. Garg, H.M.A. Farid, M. Aslam, Novel q-rung orthopair fuzzy interaction aggregation operators and their application to low-carbon green supply chain management. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 41(2), 4109–4126. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-210506

  59. Z. Yang, H. Garg, Interaction power partitioned Maclaurin symmetric mean operators under q-rung orthopair uncertain linguistic information. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 1–19 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-021-01062-5

  60. H. Garg, A novel trigonometric operation-based q-rung orthopair fuzzy aggregation operator and its fundamental properties. Neural Comput. Appl. 32(18), 15077–15099 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. X. Peng, J. Dai, H. Garg, Exponential operation and aggregation operator for q-rung orthopair fuzzy set and their decision-making method with a new score function. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 33(11), 2255–2282 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tahir Mahmood .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mahmood, T., Ali, Z. (2022). MARCOS Technique by Using q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Sets for Evaluating the Performance of Insurance Companies in Terms of Healthcare Services. In: Garg, H. (eds) q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Sets. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1449-2_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics