Skip to main content

Evaluation of the Efficacy of a Treatment Pond System for Removal of Concentrated Iron and Arsenic Produced from Water Treatment Plant (WTP) Wastewater

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the Canadian Society of Civil Engineering Annual Conference 2021 (CSCE 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 249))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Drinking water treatment plant (DWTP) processes generate wastes in the form of residual wastewaters and sludges. The quality of the wastes generated is dependent on the characteristics of the source of raw water. Generally, groundwater contains higher metal(loid) concentrations than surface water due to its contact with rocks and minerals, whereas surface waters contain more organics. The use of raw groundwater may cause a magnification of metal(loid)s such as arsenic (As) and iron (Fe) in residual wastewater from WTPs, making disposal problematic. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate the quality of residual wastewaters prior to their release to the receptor water. This research evaluated the effectiveness of a Waste Stabilization Pond (WSP) system in treatment of As and Fe in residual wastewaters of a DWTP in southern Saskatchewan, Canada. The WSP system consists of a series of five ponds designed to settle out and oxidize contaminants. Iron and As concentrations across the individual ponds were measured on daily and monthly bases and the effectiveness of the pond system for reducing suspended and dissolved metal(loid)s was evaluated. The concentration of Fe reliably decreased for the first three ponds, before increasing in the final two Ponds. The As concentration generally increased from Ponds 1 through 3, decreased in Pond 4, and increased in Pond 5. Environmental guidelines for As concentrations are typically exceeded in the WSP effluents and individual ponds, while Fe concentrations currently meet guidelines for all ponds in the WSP system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bury NR, Boyle D, Cooper CA (2012) Iron. In: Wood CM, Farrell AP, Brauner CJ (eds) Homeostasis and toxicology of essential metals. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 201–251

    Google Scholar 

  2. Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) (2001) Canadian water quality guidelines for the protection of aquatic life: arsenic. Canadian council of ministers of the environment, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  3. Climate-Data.org (2015) Saskatchewan climate. August 9. https://en.climate-data.org/north-america/canada/saskatchewan/

  4. Deng T, Wu Y, Yu X, Guo Y, Chen Y, Belzile N (2014) Seasonal variations of arsenic at the sediment–water interface of Poyang Lake, China. Appl Geochem 47(C):170–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2014.06.002

  5. Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) (2019) Canadian environmental protection act, 1999 federal environmental quality guidelines. Environment and Climate Change Canada

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gammons CH, Grant TM, Nimick DA, Parker SR, DeGrandpre MD (2007) Diel changes in water chemistry in an arsenic-rich stream and treatment-pond system. Sci Total Environ 384(1):433–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.06.029

  7. Handley KM, Mcbeth JM, Charnock JM, Vaughan DJ, Wincott PL, Polya DA, Lloyd JR (2013) Effect of iron redox transformations on arsenic solid-phase associations in an arsenic-rich, ferruginous hydrothermal sediment. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 102:124–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2012.10.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Khatri N, Tyagi S, Rawtani D (2017) Recent strategies for the removal of iron from water: a review. J Water Process Eng 19:291–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2017.08.015

  9. Linton TK, Pacheco MAW, Mcintyre DO, Clement WH, Goodrich-Mahoney J (2007) Development of bioassessment-based benchmarks for iron. Environ Toxicol Chem 26(6):1291–1298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Litter MI, Ingallinella AM, Olmos V, Savio M, Difeo G, Botto L, Torres EMF, Taylor S, Frangie S, Herkovits J, Schalamuk I, González MJ, Berardozzi E (2019) Arsenic in Argentina: technologies for arsenic removal from groundwater sources, investment costs and waste management practices. Sci Total Environ 690:778–789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Litter MI, Morgada ME, Bundschuh J (2010) Possible treatments for arsenic removal in Latin American waters for human consumption. Environ Poll 158(5):1105–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2010.01.028

  12. Lloyd BJ, Leitner AR, Vorkas CA, Guganesharajah RK (2003) Under-performance evaluation and rehabilitation strategy for waste stabilization ponds in Mexico. Water Sci Technol 48(2):35–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. National Research Council (US) Committee on Medical and Biological Effects of Environmental Pollutants (1977) Arsenic: medical and biologic effects of environmental pollutants. National Academies Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nimick DA, Cleasby TE, McCleskey RB (2005) Seasonality of diel cycles of dissolved trace-metal concentrations in a rocky mountain stream. Environ Geol 47(5):603–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-004-1178-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nimick DA, Gammons CH, Cleasby TE, Madison JP, Skaar D, Brick CM (2003) Diel cycles in dissolved metal concentrations in streams: occurrence and possible causes. Water Resour Res 39(9):1247–1264. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002WR001571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shen H (2015) Cold regions science and marine technology. EOLSS Publishers Company Limited, Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sun Q, Ding S, Wang Y, Xu LV, Wang D, Chen J, Zhang C (2016) In-Situ characterization and assessment of arsenic mobility in lake sediments. Environ Poll 214(C):314–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.04.039

  18. U.S. Department of Energy (2013) Reverse Osmosis optimization. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

    Google Scholar 

  19. US EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (1998) Inductively coupled plasma—mass spectrometry. EPA 6020A (SW-846)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ventura-Lima J, Bogo MR, Monserrat JM (2011) Arsenic toxicity in mammals and aquatic animals: a comparative biochemical approach. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 74(3):211–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. World Health Organization (2008) Guidelines for drinking-water quality incorporating 1st and 2nd addenda, vol1, Recommendations, 3rd edn. WHO Press, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge funding provided through the Mitacs Accelerate program and the financial and research support of SaskWater. In addition, research support has been provided by SaskWater personnel including Sumith Kahanda, Enisa Zanacic, Dale Hreshka, and Timo Jansen.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Bull .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Canadian Society for Civil Engineering

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bull, H., Ekhlasi Nia, A., McPhedran, K. (2023). Evaluation of the Efficacy of a Treatment Pond System for Removal of Concentrated Iron and Arsenic Produced from Water Treatment Plant (WTP) Wastewater. In: Walbridge, S., et al. Proceedings of the Canadian Society of Civil Engineering Annual Conference 2021 . CSCE 2021. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 249. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1061-6_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1061-6_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-1060-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-1061-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics