Skip to main content

Integrated Framework for Identifying Energy-Use Behavior of Hotel Guests

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the Canadian Society of Civil Engineering Annual Conference 2021 (CSCE 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 249))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 284 Accesses

Abstract

There are about 47,000 hotels in the United States that spend an average of $2200 per room on energy annually, averaging $6 per hotel room per night. The average total energy cost per room represents approximately 6% of a hotel’s operating costs. Studies found that guests’ energy-related behavior is one of the main factors that affects energy consumption in hotel buildings. However, there has been little or no research study that provides practical and efficient energy-use reduction strategies based on guests’ energy-related behavior in hotel buildings. Existing research studies are either limited to offices and residential buildings or lack analysis showing occupant impact on hotel buildings’ energy consumption. To address this research gap, this study aims to develop an integrated energy-use framework in two steps: (1) identifying and synthesizing four energy-related behaviors models (i.e., Motivation-Opportunity-Ability, Norm Activation Model, Theory of Planned Behavior, and Pro-environmental Behavior) adopted from the field of social psychology; and (2) developing a set of hypotheses and their relevant measures to examine the relationship among the energy-related behavior models and hotel guests’ energy-use behavior. The findings of this study will provide decision-makers in hotels with a better understanding on how to measure their guests’ energy-related behavior; and accordingly develop effective strategies to reduce energy consumption in hotel buildings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abrahamse W, Steg L (2009) How do socio-demographic and psychological factors relate to households’ direct and indirect energy use and savings? J Econ Psychol 30(5):711–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Processes Theor Cogn Self-Regul 50(2):179–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bamberg S, Hunecke M, Blobaum A (2007) Social Context, Personal Norms and the Use of Public Transportation: Two Field Studies. J Environ Psychol 27(3):190–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bigné E, Hernandez B, Ruiz C, Andreu L (2010) How motivation, opportunity and ability can drive online airline ticket purchases. J Air Transp Manag 16(6):346–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Celsi RL, Olson JC (1988) The role of involvement in attention and comprehension processes. J Consum Res 15(2):210–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen M, Tung P (2014) Developing an extended theory of planned behavior model to predict consumers’ intention to visit green hotels. Int J Hosp Manag 36(1):221–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Csoknyai T, Legardeur J, Abi Akle A, Horváth M (2019) Analysis of energy consumption profiles in residential buildings and impact assessment of a serious game on occupants’ behavior. Energy Build 196(8):1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. D’Oca S, Chen C, Hong T, Belafi Z (2017) Synthesizing building physics with social psychology: an interdisciplinary framework for context and occupant behavior in office buildings. Energy Res Soc Sci 34(12):240–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Eccles M, Grimshaw J, Walker A, Johnston M, Pitts N (2005) Changing the behavior of healthcare professionals: the use of theory in promoting the uptake of research findings. J Clin Epidemiol 58(2):107–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Energy Information Administration (EIA) (2020). https://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=87&t=1

  11. Forward SE (2009) The theory of planned behaviour: the role of descriptive norms and past behaviour in the prediction of drivers’ intentions to violate. Transp Res F Traff Psychol Behav 12(3):198–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fujii S (2006) Environmental concern, attitude toward frugality, and ease of behavior as determinants of pro-environmental behavior intentions. J Environ Psychol 26(4):262–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Geller ES (1995) Integrating behaviorism and humanism for environmental protection. J Soc Issues 51(4):179–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Greaves M, Zibarras LD, Stride C (2013) Using the theory of planned behavior to explore environmental behavioral intentions in the workplace. J Environ Psychol 34(6):109–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Grob A (1995) A structural model of environmental attitudes and behaviour. J Environ Psychol Green Psychol 15(3):209–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Groot JD, Steg L (2007) General beliefs and the theory of planned behavior: the role of environmental concerns in the TPB. J Appl Soc Psychol 37(8):1817–1836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gruen TW, Osmonbekov T, Czaplewski AJ (2005) How e-communities extend the concept of exchange in marketing: an application of the motivation, opportunity, ability (MOA) theory. Mark Theory 5(1):33–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Han H, Hwang J, Kim J, Jung H (2015) Guests’ pro-environmental decision-making process: broadening the norm activation framework in a lodging context. Int J Hosp Manag 47(5):96–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Houwelingen JH, Raaij WF (1989) The effect of goal-setting and daily electronic feedback on in-home energy use. J Consum Res 16(1):98–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Johnson PM, Xu Y, Brewer RS, Lee GE, Katchuck M, Moore CA (2012) Beyond KWh: myths and fixes for energy competition game design. Proc Meaningful Play 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kaiser FG, Fuhrer U (2003) Ecological behavior’s dependency on different forms of knowledge. Appl Psychol 52(4):598–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kaiser FG, Wölfing S, Fuhrer U (1999) Environmental attitude and ecological behaviour. J Environ Psychol 19(1):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Karatas A, Menassa CC, Stoiko A (2015) A framework for delivering targeted occupancy interventions to reduce energy usage in buildings. Procedia Eng Defining Future Sustain Resilience Des Eng Constr 118(1):752–759

    Google Scholar 

  24. Karatas A, Stoiko A, Menassa CC (2016) Framework for selecting occupancy-focused energy interventions in buildings. Build Res Info 44(5–6):535–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim Y, Choi SM (2005) Antecedents of green purchase behavior: an examination of collectivism, environmental concern, and pce. ACR North American Advances NA-32. https://www.acrwebsite.org/volumes/9156/volumes/v32/NA-32

  26. Klein L, Kwak J, Kavulya G, Jazizadeh F, Becerik-Gerber B, Varakantham P, Tambe M (2012) Coordinating occupant behavior for building energy and comfort management using multi-agent systems. Autom Constr 22(3):525–36

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kurisu K (2015) Pro-Environmental Behaviors. Springer, Tokyo, Japan

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. Lam S (1999) Predicting intentions to conserve water from the theory of planned behavior, perceived moral obligation, and perceived water right. J Appl Soc Psychol 29(5):1058–1071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lee H, Kurisu K, Hanaki K (2013) Influential factors on pro-environmental behaviors—a case study in tokyo and seoul. Low Carbon Economy 4(3):104–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Li D, Menassa CC, Karatas A (2017) Energy use behaviors in buildings: towards an integrated conceptual framework. Energy Res Soc Sci 23:97–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Li D, Xu X, Chen C, Menassa C (2019) Understanding energy-saving behaviors in the american workplace: a unified theory of motivation, opportunity, and ability. Energy Res Soc Sci 51(5):198–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lutzenhiser L (1993) Social and behavioral aspects of energy use. Annu Rev Energy Env 18(1):247–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. MacInnis DJ, Moorman C, Jaworski BJ (1991) Enhancing and measuring consumers’ motivation, opportunity, and ability to process brand information from ads. J Mark 55(4):32–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. McMakin AH, Malone EL, Lundgren RE (2002) Motivating residents to conserve energy without financial incentives. Environ Behav 34(6):848–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Miao L, Wei W (2013) Consumers’ pro-environmental behavior and the underlying motivations: a comparison between household and hotel settings. Int J Hosp Manag 32(3):102–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Moorman C (1990) The effects of stimulus and consumer characteristics on the utilization of nutrition information. J Consum Res 17(3):362–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. ölander F, ThØgersen J (1995) Understanding of consumer behaviour as a prerequisite for environmental protection. J Consum Policy 18(4):345–85

    Google Scholar 

  38. Onwezen MC, Antonides G, Bartels J (2013) The norm activation model: an exploration of the functions of anticipated pride and guilt in pro-environmental behaviour. J Econ Psychol 39(12):141–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Palani H, Karatas A (2021) Identifying Energy-Use Behavior and Energy-Use Profiles of Hotel Guests. Applied Sciences 11(13):6093

    Google Scholar 

  40. Perugini M, Bagozzi RP (2001) The role of desires and anticipated emotions in goal-directed behaviours: broadening and deepening the theory of planned behaviour. Br J Soc Psychol 40(1):79–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Peschiera G, Taylor JE, Siegel JA (2010) Response-relapse patterns of building occupant electricity consumption following exposure to personal, contextualized and occupant peer network utilization data. Energy Build 42(8):1329–1336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Rai V, Beck AL (2015) Public perceptions and information gaps in solar energy in Texas. Environ Res Lett 10(7):074011

    Google Scholar 

  43. Rivis A, Sheeran P (2003) Descriptive norms as an additional predictor in the theory of planned behaviour: a meta-analysis. Curr Psychol 22(3):218–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Schwartz SH (1977) Normative influences on altruism. In: Advances in experimental social psychology, Elsevier, 10:221–79

    Google Scholar 

  45. Seyrfar A, Ataei H, Movahedi A, Derrible S (2021) Data-Driven Approach for Evaluating the Energy Efficiency in Multifamily Residential Buildings. Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction. American Society of Civil Engineers 26(2):04020074.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Steg L, Vlek C (2009) Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: an integrative review and research agenda. J Environ Psychol Environ Psychol Move 29(3):309–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Takala M (1991) Environmental awareness and human activity. Int J Psychol 26(5):585–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Thøgersen J (2014) The mediated influences of perceived norms on pro-environmental behavior. Revue d’economie politique 124(2):179–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Wang J, Zhu J, Ding Z, Zou PXW, Li J (2019) Typical energy-related behaviors and gender difference for cooling energy consumption. J Clean Prod 238(11):117846

    Google Scholar 

  50. Werff EVD, Steg L (2015) One model to predict them all: predicting energy behaviours with the norm activation model. Energy Res Soc Sci 6(3):8–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Wong NH, Cheong DKW, Yan H, Soh J, Ong CL, Sia A (2003) The effects of rooftop garden on energy consumption of a commercial building in Singapore. Energy Build 35(4):353–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Yao Z, Zhuang Z, Gu W (2015) Study on energy use characteristics of hotel buildings in Shanghai. In: Procedia engineering, the 9th (ISHVAC) joint with the 3rd international (COBEE), 12–15 July 2015, Tianjin, China, 121(1):1977–82

    Google Scholar 

  53. Zhang Y, Wang Z, Zhou G (2013) Antecedents of employee electricity saving behavior in organizations: an empirical study based on norm activation model. Energy Policy 62(11):1120–1127

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Palani Hevar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Canadian Society for Civil Engineering

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hevar, P., Aslihan, K. (2023). Integrated Framework for Identifying Energy-Use Behavior of Hotel Guests. In: Walbridge, S., et al. Proceedings of the Canadian Society of Civil Engineering Annual Conference 2021 . CSCE 2021. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 249. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1061-6_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1061-6_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-1060-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-1061-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics