Abstract
Many modular projects experience accidents and problems in practice, as there are many unique issues and challenges compared to conventional “stick-built” structures. In 2017, the University of Nevada, Las Vegas (UNLV) team designed, constructed, and transported a sustainable housing prototype for the U.S. Department of Energy’s Solar Decathlon competition. The competition requires students to build an efficient and innovative building powered by renewable energy. The project experienced several problems associated with its unique modular design. This paper presents the results of a qualitative case study to identify difficulties and generate recommendations for future modular projects. The authors collected data from key project participants using a survey comprised of specific questions. Results showed that the most critical problem throughout the project’s execution was communication among project participants and the managing organization. The main technical issues identified during construction were associated with the adequate performance of the integrated trailer chassis hitches. During the competition phase, the critical problem was the time crunch experienced due to delays caused by the chassis difficulties. Key suggested recommendations for future projects are: (1) integrating a general contractor for project organization to keep everything running smoothly; and (2) consistent and frequent communication throughout the design phase among all design and construction teams. These findings provide valuable information for future student modular project teams for designing, constructing, and transporting modular housing.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akagi K, Murayama K, Yoshida M, Kawahata J (2002) Modularization technology in power plant construction. In: Proceedings of ICONE10 10th international conference on nuclear engineering Arlington, VA, Apr 14–18, pp 21–27
Bertram N, Fuchs S, Mischke J, Palter R, Strube G, Woetzel J (2019) Modular construction: from projects to products. McKinsey & Company: Capital Projects & Infrastructure, pp 1–34
Bhatla A, Pradhan B, Choi J (2016) Identifying wastes in construction process and implementing the last planner system in India. J Constr Eng Project Manage 6(1):34–42
Boafo FE, Kim JH, Kim JT (2016) Performance of modular prefabricated architecture: case study-based review and future pathways. Sustainability (Switzerland) 8(6):1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8060558
Choi JO, Chen XB, Kim TW (2017) Opportunities and challenges of modular methods in dense urban environment. Int J Constr Manag. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2017.1382093
Choi JO, O’Connor JT, Kim TW (2016) Recipes for cost and schedule successes in industrial modular projects: qualitative comparative analysis. J Constr Eng Manag 142(10):04016055. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001171
Court PF, Pasquire CL, Gibb GF, Bower D (2009) Modular assembly with postponement to improve health, safety, and productivity in construction. Pract Period Struct Des Constr 14(2):81–89. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)1084-0680(2009)14:2(81)
Deemer GR (1996) Modularization reduces cost and unexpected delays. Hydrocarbon Process (Int ed.) 75(10):143–151
Fagerlund WR (2001) Decision framework for prefabrication, pre-assembly and modularization in industrial construction. The University of Texas at Austin, Austin
Ghannad P, Lee Y-C, Choi JO (2020) Feasibility and implications of the modular construction approach for rapid post-disaster recovery. Int J Industrialized Constr 1(1):64–75
Hoover S, Snyder J, Cowles E (2018) New day, new mindset: rethinking offsite construction. FMI owner survey
Hu X, Chong HY, Wang X, London K (2019) Understanding stakeholders in offsite manufacturing: a literature review. J Constr Eng Manag 145(8):03119003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001674
Jiang Y, Zhao D, Wang D, Xing Y (2019) Sustainable performance of buildings through modular prefabrication in the construction phase: a comparative study. Sustainability (Switzerland) 11(20). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205658
Kamali M, Hewage K (2017) Development of performance criteria for sustainability evaluation of modular versus conventional construction methods. J Clean Prod 142:3592–3606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.108
Kamali M, Hewage K, Sadiq R (2019) Conventional versus modular construction methods: a comparative cradle-to-gate LCA for residential buildings. Energy Build 204:109479
KPMG (2016) Smart construction: how offsite manufacturing can transform our industry
Lawson RM, Ogden RG, Bergin R (2012) Application of modular construction in high-rise buildings. J Archit Eng 18(2):148–154. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)ae.1943-5568.0000057
Li L, Sui S (2015) Comprehensive benefits evaluation of sandwich exterior wall panel. In: Sustainable buildings and structures: proceedings of the 1st international conference on sustainable buildings and structures. Suzhou, PR China, Oct 29–Nov 1, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL
McGraw Hill Construction (2011) Prefabrication and modularization: increasing productivity in the construction industry. McGraw-Hill Construction. Smart Market Report, Bedford (MA)
O’Connor JT, O’Brien WJ, Choi JO (2015) Standardization strategy for modular industrial plants. J Constr Eng Manag 141(9):4015026. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001001
O’Connor JT, O’Brien WJ, Choi JO (2016) Industrial project execution planning: modularization versus stick-built. Pract Period Struct Des Constr 21(1):04015014. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)sc.1943-5576.0000270
US Dept of Energy (2021) About Solar Decathlon. https://www.solardecathlon.gov/about.html. Accessed 2 Mar 2021
Wong PSP, Zwar C, Gharaie E (2017) Examining the drivers and states of organizational change for greater use of prefabrication in construction projects. J Constr Eng Manag 143(7):04017020. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001309
Wuni IY, Shen GQ (2020) Barriers to the adoption of modular integrated construction: systematic review and meta-analysis, integrated conceptual framework, and strategies. J Cleaner Prod 249:119347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119347
Zhai X, Reed R, Mills A (2014) Embracing offsite innovation in construction in China to enhance a sustainable built environment in urban housing. Int J Constr Manag 14(3):123–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2014.922727
Acknowledgements
The authors express their gratitude to the interviewees who donated their time to this study. The authors also thank UNLV’s Solar Decathlon 2017 team members for their excellent work and success in their competition.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
Solar Decathlon Survey
Please answer the following questions to the best of your ability, the information provided from these surveys will be compiled for a paper regarding best practices and lessons learned from the 2017 Solar Decathlon competition.
Name:
Project Role:
1. What were some of the major problems experienced during the construction phase through the competition phase? Please explain in some detail.
2. What solutions were used for the problems mentioned above? Please explain in some detail.
3. In hindsight, could any of the solutions be improved for the future, if so, how? Also, on that note, which problems could have been avoided and how? Please explain in some detail.
4. With the knowledge and experience you have now, would you be willing to participate in the next Solar Decathlon or comparable international events? Why or why not? Please explain in some detail.
5. Should UNLV compete, what advice would you give to the students participating in the 2020 Solar Decathlon competition?
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 Canadian Society for Civil Engineering
About this paper
Cite this paper
Prestia, J., Choi, J.O., Lee, S., James, D. (2023). Lessons Learned from UNLV’s Solar Decathlon 2017 Competition Experience—Design and Construction of a Modular House. In: Walbridge, S., et al. Proceedings of the Canadian Society of Civil Engineering Annual Conference 2021. CSCE 2021. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 247. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0968-9_45
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0968-9_45
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-0967-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-0968-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)