Skip to main content

Virtual Reality-Motion Capture-Based Ergonomic Risk Assessment of Workstation Designs of Construction Manufacturing Facilities

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the Canadian Society of Civil Engineering Annual Conference 2021 (CSCE 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 247))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Despite the utilization of automated equipment, workers in construction manufacturing facilities are often exposed to high physical demands. These demands are associated with the risk of developing work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs). To control the degree to which workers are exposed to the risk of developing WMSDs, ergonomic risks associated with tasks performed at workstations should be identified and prevented in the early stages of workstation design. The application of virtual reality (VR) techniques facilitates the simulation of real operational settings in a safe and controlled environment, thereby allowing the identification of ergonomic risks associated with workstation design. In this context, this study proposes an approach that integrates a virtual reality environment with a motion capture system to evaluate workstation design options. By identifying ergonomic risk ratings proactively in the initial phases of workstation design, the number of iterations required using physical prototypes is thus minimized, thereby reducing the cost and time required to develop and implement an improved workstation design. To demonstrate the proposed approach, a research experiment of window hardware installation is conducted to compare the ergonomic risks associated with two workstation design options. Information on body motion is collected using a motion capture system and assessed using two existing risk assessment methods, Rapid Upper Limb Assessment and Rapid Entire Body Assessment; as a result, tasks with high ergonomic risks are identified and a design option is selected. This research will aid in providing an alternative approach to selecting a workstation design option in the early design phase.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ahlstrom V (2016) Human factors design standard (DOT/FAA/HF-STD-001B). U.S. Department of Transportation, Atlantic City, NJ, USA

    Google Scholar 

  2. Azizi A, Ghafoorpoor Yazdi P, Hashemipour M (2018) Interactive design of storage unit utilizing virtual reality and ergonomic framework for production optimization in manufacturing industry. Int J Interact Design Manuf Spring Paris 13(1):373–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barkokebas R, Ritter C, Sirbu V, Li X, Al-Hussein M (2019) Application of virtual reality in task training in the construction manufacturing industry. ISARC, University of Alberta Librairies, Banff, AB, Canada 1:796–803

    Google Scholar 

  4. Battini D, Calzavara M, Persona A, Sgarbossa F, Visentin V, Ilenia Z (2018) Integrating MOCAP system and immersive reality for efficient human-centred workstation design. IFAC, Elsevier 51(11):188–193

    Google Scholar 

  5. Botti L, Mora C, Regattieri A (2017) Application of a mathematical model for ergonomics in lean manufacturing. Data in Brief Elsevier 14:360–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety (2014) What are work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs). Government of Canada. https://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/ergonomics/risk

  7. Davila Delgado JM, Oyedele L, Demian P, Beach T (2020) A research agenda for augmented and virtual reality in architecture, engineering and construction. Adv Eng Inform Elsevier 45

    Google Scholar 

  8. Deros MB, Khamis NK, Ismail AR, Jamaluddin H, Adam AM, Rosli S (2011) An ergonomics study on assembly line workstation design. American J Appl Sci Sci Publications 8(11):1195–1201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dias Barkokebas R, Li X (2021) Use of virtual reality to assess the ergonomic risk of industrialized construction tasks. J Construct Eng Managem ASCE 147(3):1–17

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dias Barkokebas R, Ritter C, Li X, Al-Hussein M (2020) Application of virtual reality to perform ergonomic risk assessment in industrialized construction: experiment design. In: Construction research congress 2020: construction research and innovation to transform society, ASCE, Tempe, AZ, USA. vol 1. pp 405–413

    Google Scholar 

  11. Freivalds A (2014) Standards and work design, 13th edn. McGraw Hill, New York, NY, USA

    Google Scholar 

  12. Guimarães LB, de M, Anzanello MJ, Ribeiro JLD, Saurin TA (2015) Participatory ergonomics intervention for improving human and production outcomes of a Brazilian furniture company. Int J Indust Ergonom Elsevier, 49:97–107

    Google Scholar 

  13. Guo SY, Ding LY, Luo HB, Jiang XY (2016) A big-data-based platform of workers’ behavior: observations from the field. Accident Anal Prevent Elsevier 93:299–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hignett S, McAtamney L (2000) Rapid entire body assessment (REBA). Appl Ergonom Elsevier 31(2):201–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Li H, Chan NKY, Huang T, Skitmore M, Yang J (2012) Virtual prototyping for planning bridge construction. Autom Construct Elsevier 27:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. McAtamney L, Nigel EC (1993) RULA: a survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders. Appl Ergonom Elsevier 24(2):91–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Modular Building Institute (MBI). 2016. Permanent Modular Construction: Annual Report. http://www.modular.org/documents/document_publication/mbi_sage_pmc_2017_reduced.pdf.

  18. Peruzzini M, Grandi F, Cavallaro S, Pellicciari M (2020) Using virtual manufacturing to design human-centric factories: an industrial case. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 1:1–15. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  19. Peruzzini M, Pellicciari M, Gadaleta M (2019) A comparative study on computer-integrated set-ups to design human-centred manufacturing systems. Robot Comput Integ Manuf Elsevier 55:265–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Public Services Health & Safety Association (2010) In: Repetitive work: could you please repeat that … again and again and again?. Municipal Health & Safety Association. https://www.pshsa.ca/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/RepetitiveWorkInjury.pdf

  21. Shinde GV, Jadhav VS (2012) Ergonomic analysis of an assembly workstation to identify time consuming and fatigue causing factors using application of motion study. Int J Eng Technol Elsevier 4(4):220–227

    Google Scholar 

  22. Whyte J, Nikolic D (2018) Virtual reality and the built environment, 2nd edn. Routledge, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Wolfartsberger J (2019) Analyzing the potential of virtual reality for engineering design review. Autom Construct Elsevier 104:27–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Xu Z, Ko J, Cochran DJ, Jung MC (2012) Design of assembly lines with the concurrent consideration of productivity and upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders using linear models. Comput Indust Eng Elsevier 62(2):431–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang Y, Liu H, Zhao M, Al-Hussein M (2019) User-centered interior finishing material selection: an immersive virtual reality-based interactive approach. Autom Construct Elsevier 106

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors appreciate the technical writing assistance of Jonathan Tomalty and Kristin Berg. In addition, the authors express their gratitude to Melissa McNeil for assisting in gameplay scripting and designing the 3D scenes used in the VR applications, Anas Itani for providing the design options evaluated in this study, and all volunteers that participated in the experiment. Before recruiting participants to participate in this study, the authors received approval by the University of Alberta’s Research Ethics Board, hence, this study’s adherence to ethical guidelines related to the observation of humans has been ensured. This work was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery Grant [grant number RGPIN-2019-04585] and the University of Alberta.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to X. Li .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Canadian Society for Civil Engineering

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Barkokebas, R.D., Al-Hussein, M., Li, X. (2023). Virtual Reality-Motion Capture-Based Ergonomic Risk Assessment of Workstation Designs of Construction Manufacturing Facilities. In: Walbridge, S., et al. Proceedings of the Canadian Society of Civil Engineering Annual Conference 2021. CSCE 2021. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 247. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0968-9_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0968-9_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-0967-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-0968-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics