Skip to main content

A Faceted Classification System for Innovation in the Construction Industry

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the Canadian Society of Civil Engineering Annual Conference 2021 (CSCE 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 247))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Several theories and conceptual frameworks have been developed over the years to understand the processes, mechanisms and impacts related to innovation in the construction industry. Many challenges remain however, in its conceptualization, particularly in terms of identifying and understanding its components and how they are articulated. While innovation in the construction industry has led to new perspectives on how the industry designs, delivers and maintains the built environment, its implementation remains a considerable challenge for industry stakeholders. To reap its oft-promised benefits, companies need to identify and evaluate innovations that can be effectively deployed on their projects while understanding the scale and scope of their impact. As such, providing ways to fully understand the types of innovations and, potentially, their impact can help in guiding their implementation. The objective of the research presented in this paper was to develop a classification system for innovation in construction and to identify the characteristics of its different facets. Departing from the more traditional hierarchical view of innovation classification, a flatter, multi-facetted approach to classification is proposed. This approach is believed to be more representative of the multiple perspectives adopted in the literature to report these characteristics. The choice of class was dictated by its ease of application to industry and the complementary nature of the different facets. The classification of innovations focuses on 5 dimensions adapted from the literature review and chosen based on their applicability, which was tested through a survey. The classified objects can correspond to several facets and elements thanks to the faceted structure, making the classification more modular and expandable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Afsari K, Eastman CM (2016) A comparison of construction classification systems used for classifying building product models. In: 52nd ASC annual international conference proceedings, 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blanco JL, Mullin A, Pandya K, Sridhar M (2017) The new age of engineering and construction technology. McKinsey & Company-Capital Projects & Infrastructure

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chowdhury T, Adafin J, Wilkinson S (2019) Review of digital technologies to improve productivity of New Zealand construction industry. J Information Technol Constr 24(2019VMAR):569–587. https://doi.org/10.36680/j.itcon.2019.032

  4. Crossan MM, Apaydin M (2010) A Multi-dimensional framework of organizational innovation: a systematic review of the literature. J Manage Stud 47(6):1154–1191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00880.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Delarue C (2021) Étude sur l’état de lieux en matière d’usage des technologies en construction et leur impact.” École de technologie supérieure

    Google Scholar 

  6. Deloitte and Conseil du patronat du Québec (2016) Étude sur l’écosystème d’affaires de la construction au Québec. Accessed 8 Feb 2021. https://www.cpq.qc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/cpq-construction270516.pdf

  7. Dodgson M, Gann D, Salter AJ (2005) Think, play, do: technology, innovation, and organization. Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fergusson KJ (1993) Impact of integration on industrial facility quality, 84. Stanford University

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fettke P, Loos P (2003) Classification of reference models: a methodology and its application. IseB 1(1):35–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Goodrum PM, Haas CT, Caldas C, Zhai D, Yeiser J, Homm D (2011) Model to predict the impact of a technology on construction productivity. J Constr Eng Manag 137(9):678–688. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Huerdo Fernandez M, Dewez P (2019) Comparatif des systèmes de classification dans le cadre du BIM - Monographies CSTC. Centre Scientifique et Technique de la Construction. https://www.cstc.be/homepage/index.cfm?cat=publications&sub=search&id=REF00011847

  12. Jung Y, Gibson GE (1999) Planning for computer integrated construction. J Comput Civ Eng 13(4):217–225. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(1999)13:4(217)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jung Y, Joo M (2011) Building Information Modelling (BIM) framework for practical implementation. Autom Constr, Build Inf Modeling Changing Constr Pract 20(2):126–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2010.09.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lim JN, Ofori G (2007) Classification of innovation for strategic decision making in construction businesses. Constr Manag Econ 25(9):963–978. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190701393026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Loosemore M, Richard J (2015) Valuing innovation in construction and infrastructure: getting clients past a lowest price mentality. Eng Constr Archit Manag 22(1):38–53. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-02-2014-0031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nasir H (2013) Best Productivity Practices Implementation Index (BPPII) for infrastructure projects. August. https://uwspace.uwaterloo.ca/handle/10012/7731

  17. Noktehdan M, Shahbazpour M, Wilkinson S (2015) Driving innovative thinking in the New Zealand construction industry. Buildings 5(2):297–309. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings5020297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Noktehdan M, Shahbazpour M, Zare MR, Wilkinson S (2019) Innovation management and construction phases in infrastructure projects. J Constr Eng Manag 145(2):04018135. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ozorhon B, Oral K, Demirkesen S (2016) Investigating the components of innovation in construction projects. J Manag Eng 32(3):04015052. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Reichstein T, Salter AJ, Gann DM (2005) Last among equals: a comparison of innovation in construction, services and manufacturing in the UK. Constr Manag Econ 23(6):631–644. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190500126940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Slaughter ES (1998) Models of construction innovation. J Constr Eng Manag 124(3):226–231. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1998)124:3(226)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tatum CB (1988) Classification system for construction technology. J Constr Eng Manag 114(3):344–363. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1988)114:3(344)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wild PJ, Giess MD, McMahon CA (2009) Describing engineering documents with faceted approaches: observations and reflections. J Documentation 65(3):420–445. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410910952410

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper is produced bases on a research project in collaboration with the Association de la construction du Québec (ACQ) and the Association des constructeurs de routes et grands travaux du Québec (ACRGTQ). The work presented was partly financed by a grant from the organism Mitacs.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Érik A. Poirier .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Canadian Society for Civil Engineering

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Delarue, C., Poirier, É.A., Forgues, D. (2023). A Faceted Classification System for Innovation in the Construction Industry. In: Walbridge, S., et al. Proceedings of the Canadian Society of Civil Engineering Annual Conference 2021. CSCE 2021. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 247. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0968-9_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0968-9_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-0967-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-0968-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics