Skip to main content

Real-Time CPU Burst Time Prediction Approach for Processes in the Computational Grid Using ML

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Intelligent Computing and Communication

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 430))

  • 281 Accesses

Abstract

Shortest-Job-First (SJF) and other CPU scheduling techniques are achieved by analysing the duration of the CPU bursts in the ready queue processes. Static and dynamic approaches can estimate the time of CPU bursts, although they may not provide accurate or dependable predictions. This research proposes a method based on machine learning (ML) to evaluate the CPU bursts of processes. Feature selection approaches are employed to identify and estimate CPU burst times for grid processes in real-time without spending many computational resources and processing time. The suggested method is tested and evaluated using a grid workload data set known as “GWA-T-4 AuverGrid”, utilising ML approaches such as linear regression and decision trees regression. We conducted an experiment that found a linear correlation between CPU burst strength and process properties to test this. Furthermore, in nearly all cases, we strive to design an algorithm that predicts burst times in real-time with minimal time and space complexity to be implemented in the real world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Silberschatz A, Galvin PB, Gagne G (2013) Operating system concepts, vol 8. Wiley, NY

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Fernández-Baca D (1989) Allocating modules to processors in a distributed system. IEEE Trans Software Eng 15(11):1427–1436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mahesh Kumar MR, Renuka Rajendra B, Niranjan CK, Sreenatha M (2014) Prediction of the length of the next CPU burst in SJF scheduling algorithm using the dual simplex method. In: 2014 2nd international conference on current trends in engineering and technology (ICCTET), IEEE, pp 248–252

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kasana HS, Kumar KD (eds) (2004) Introductory operations research: theory and applications. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Pourali A, Rahmani AM (2009) A fuzzy-based scheduling algorithm for prediction of next CPU-burst time to implement shortest process next. In: Computer science and information technology-spring conference, IACSITSC’09, IEEE, pp 217–220

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kosko B (1991) Neural networks and fuzzy systems: a dynamical systems approach to machine intelligence. Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Smith W, Foster I, Taylor V (2004) Predicting application runtimes with historical information. J Parallel Distrib Comput 64(9):1007–1016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Matsunaga A, Fortes JAB (2010) On the use of machine learning to predict the time and resources consumed by applications. In: Proceedings of the 2010 10th IEEE/ACM international conference on cluster, cloud and grid computing, IEEE Computer Society, pp 495–504

    Google Scholar 

  9. Helmy T, Al-Azani S, Bin-Obaidellah O (2015) A machine learning-based approach to estimate the CPU-bursttime for processesin the computational grid. In: 2015 third international conference on artificial intelligence, modelling and simulation

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mehmood Shah SN, Mahmood AKB, Oxley A (2010) Analysis and evaluation of grid scheduling algorithms using real workload traces. In: Proceedings of the international conference on management of emergent digital eco systems, ACM, pp 234–239

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kohavi R, Kohavi R (1997) Wrappers for feature subset selection. Artif Intell 97(1–2):273–324. Retrieved http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S000437029700043X

  12. Mitchell T (1997) Machine learning, 1st edn. The Mc-Graw Hill Company. Inc. International Edition, pp 52–75, 154–183, 230–244

    Google Scholar 

  13. Amur HR, Shenoy GR, Sarma D, Vaddagiri S, Plimsoll: a DVS algorithm hierarchy

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pradeeep Kumar Mallick .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Panda, A.R., Sirmour, S., Mallick, P.K. (2022). Real-Time CPU Burst Time Prediction Approach for Processes in the Computational Grid Using ML. In: Mohanty, M.N., Das, S. (eds) Advances in Intelligent Computing and Communication. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 430. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0825-5_58

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics