Skip to main content

Assessment of Environmental Flows of Tungabhadra River Using Global Environmental Flow Calculator

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Innovative Trends in Hydrological and Environmental Systems

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 234))

  • 486 Accesses

Abstract

Maintaining the full scale of naturally occurring river flow is usually impossible due to the development of the water resources and variations of land and soil usage in the catchment. These developed resources can create differences in the balance of the ecosystem and socio-economic activities. These designed structures also cause a decrease in the minimum flow regime in downstream. Environmental flows (EFs) are the medium that help maintain river flow in healthy or ecological conditions. The river’s hydrologic (river mapping), hydraulic (cross-section, water depth, and velocity), and environmental conditions (riparian flora and fauna) are significant considerations for estimating environmental flows (EF’s). There are various desktop assessment methods for calculating the environmental flows. In this present study, the global environmental flow calculator (GEFC) method is used to estimate the ecological flows by using the flow duration curves (FDC) generated from the given monthly discharge data of the river. The FDC in this system contains 17 fixed percentile points concerning the discharge. In the current study, we analyze the environmental flows of the Tungabhadra River basin by considering the different discharge stations, which are Balehonuur, Haralahalli, Hosaritti, Shivamogga, Honalli, Rattihalli, and Tungabhadra Dam, with a mean annual flow (MAF) of 36%, 24.8%, 27.2%, 16.2%, 23.3%, 21.1%, and 12.2%, respectively, to maintain the ecological conditions of the river. The monthly discharge data from 1995 to 2017 for those stations are obtain from the Advance Center for Integrated Water Resource (ACIWR) Bengaluru, India. The river flow health is a study which helps in understanding the environmental variables that effects the habitat structure, flow regime, water quality, and biological conditions of the river. To estimate the Flow Health of Tungabhadra River, we used a tool called Flow Health which uses nine indicators to represent the Flow Health (FH) score for the stations Balehonnur, Haralahalli, Hosaritti, Shivamogga, Honalli, Rattihalli, and Tungabhadra. This tool uses the gauge discharge data in the form of reference (1995–2005) and test periods (2006–2017), with Flow Health score of 0.72, 0.4, 0.72,0.70, 0.58, 0.73, 0.71 and 0.72, 0.63, 0.63, 0.7, 0.66, 0.67, 0.66 for test and reference period with respect to stations. The study noted that majority of the discharge stations along the Tungabhadra River show a moderate to low flow variations for the reference and test periods. Overall, Tungabhadra river health, measured by the flow indices, had declined from 1995–2005 to 2006–2017.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Environmental Flows—IUCN. https://www.iucn.org/theme/water/our-work/past-projects/environmental-flows

  2. Smakhtin, V. U., & Anputhas, M. (2006). An assessment of EF requirements of Indian river basins [Research Report 107]. International Water Management Institute, Colombo.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Iyer, R. R. (2005). The notion of environmental flows: A caution NIE/IWMI workshop on environmental flows. New Delhi, March 23–24, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jhingran, V. G. (1991). Fish and fisheries of India (3rd ed.). Hindustan Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Knights, P. (2002). Environmental flows: Lessons from an Australian experience. In Proceedings of International Conference: Dialog on Water, Food and Environment (18 pp.). Hanoi, Vietnam.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jain, S. K., Sharma, K. D., & Singh, V. P. (2005). Interlinking of Indian Rivers—Issues and analytical framework. In Proceedings of the IWRA XII World Water Congress (Vol. 1, pp. 1.25–1.34). New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jowett, I. G. (1997). Instream flow methods: A comparison of approaches. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management, 13, 115–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tharme, R. E. (2003). A global perspective on environmental flow assessment: Emerging trends in the development and application of environmental flow methodologies for rivers. River Research and Applications, 19, 397–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Acreman, M., & Dunbar, M. J. (2004). Defining environmental river flow requirements—A review. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 8, 861–876.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hughes, D. A., & Hannart, P. (2003). A desktop model used to provide an initial estimate of the ecological instream flow requirements of rivers in South Africa. Journal of Hydrology, 270, 167–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Uday Kumar, A., & Jayakumara, K.V. (2018). Assessment of environmental flows using hydrological methods for Krishna River, India.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Smakhtin, V. U., Revenga, C., Döll, P. (2004). Taking into account environmental water requirements in global-scale water resources assessments. In Research report of the CGIAR comprehensive assessment programme of water use in agriculture. IWMI comprehensive assessment research report (Vol. 2, 24pp.). International Water Management Institute, Colombo, Sri Lanka.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Smakhtin, V., Revenga, C., & Döll, P. (2004). A pilot global assessment of environmental water requirements and scarcity. Water International, 29, 307–317.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Environment Agency. (2001). Managing water abstraction: The catchment abstraction management strategy process. Environment Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hughes, D. A., & Münster, F. (2000). Hydrological information and techniques to support the determination of the water quantity component of the ecological reserve. Water Research Commission Report TT 137/ 00 (91 pp.). Pretoria, South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tharme, R. E., Smakhtin, V. U. (2003). Environmental flow assessment in Asia: Capitalizing on existing momentum. In Proceedings of the First Southeast Asia Water Forum, November 17–21, 2003, Chiang Mai, Thailand (Vol. 2, pp. 301–313). Thailand Water Resources Association.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hughes, D. A., & Smakhtin, V. U. (1996). Daily flow time series patching or extension: A spatial interpolation approach based on flow duration curves. Journal of Hydrological Sciences, 41(6), 851–871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Flow Health: Software to assess deviation of River flows from reference and to design a monthly environmental flow regime technical manual and user guide version 2.0.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Uday Kumar, A., & Jayakumar, K. V. (2018). Assessment of hydrological alteration and environmental flow requirements for Srisailam dam on Krishna River, India

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. N. Chandi Priya .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Chandi Priya, P.N., Shaik, R., Singh, R.K. (2022). Assessment of Environmental Flows of Tungabhadra River Using Global Environmental Flow Calculator. In: Dikshit, A.K., Narasimhan, B., Kumar, B., Patel, A.K. (eds) Innovative Trends in Hydrological and Environmental Systems. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 234. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0304-5_51

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0304-5_51

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-0303-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-0304-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics