Skip to main content

Development of Agro-Industrial Wastes in Material Production

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Recent Advances in Materials and Modern Manufacturing

Abstract

The bricks are important basic material for constructing actions and establish about 15% of the total construction material cost. Many problems challenged by the recent brick production have of shortages, cost of materials, and environmental effects of making. There is very less information that is obtainable to fix the possibility of addition agro-industries waste to brick manufacturing. Hence, this paper is about effort on the reprocessing and reuse of the agro-industries solid waste for the manufacture of Cement Bricks (CB). In this work, an effort has been made to combine wastes into the making sustainable bricks using cement, Bagasse Ash (BA), and Rice Husk (RH). The replacement levels of cement and BA like 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60% with 20% of RH to mix proportion. CB size of 230 × 80 × 110 mm was prepared. This paper grants a detailed study on compressive strength, efflorescence test, and water absorption. Intention to produce cost effective and high strength bricks than the clay bricks. Agro-industries waste material acts as a fluxing mediator within the CB. The RH and BA bricks are relatively less in weight and stronger than normal clay bricks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sankar G, Shalini V, Shanthosh J, Surenther A, Sasikumar K (2019) Experimental investigation on clay bricks by using granite saw dust. 6(3):2394–0697. ISSN (Print): 2393-8374

    Google Scholar 

  2. Badr El-Din E. Hegazy HA. Fouad HA, Hassanain M (2012) Brick manufacturing from water treatment sludge and rice Husk Ash. Australian J Basic Appl Sci 6(3)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dhamotharan R, Minnalkodi G, Dhanalakshmi G (2018) Comparative study on black cotton soil bricks using fly ash and crusher waste. Int Res J Eng Technol (IRJET) 05(03). e-ISSN: 2395-0056

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gidigasu SSR, Gawu SKY, The mode of formation, nature and geotechnical characteristics of black cotton soils—a review. Stand Sci Res Essays 1(14):377–390. (ISSN: 2310–7502)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Habib A, Begum R, Salam A, Effect of stone dust on the mechanical properties of adobe brick. IJISET—Int J Innov Sci Eng Tech 2

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang L (2013) Production of bricks from waste materials – a review. Constr Build Mater 47:643–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Saric-Coric M, Aïtcin P (2003) Influence of curing conditions on shrinkage of blended cements containing various amounts of slag. ACI Mater J 100(6):477–484

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fu X, Hou W, Yang C et al (2000) Studies on Portland cement with large amount of slag. Cem Concr Res 30(4):645–649

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dongxu L, Xuequan W, Jinlin S et al. (2000) The influence of compound admixtures on the properties of high–content slag cement. Cem Concr Res 30(1):45–50

    Google Scholar 

  10. Luo H, Lin D (2003) Evaluation of color changes in sewage sludge ash brick by using image analysis method. Pract Period Hazard, Toxic, Radioact Waste Manage 7(4):214–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lakho NA, Zardari MAA (2016) Structural properties of baked clay bricks fired with alternative fuels. Engineering 8(10):676–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gunn A, Dewhurst R, Giorgetti A, et al (2004) Use of sewage sludge in construction. CIRIA, c608. London

    Google Scholar 

  13. Anderson, Elliot M et al. (2002) Factory–scale proving trials using combined mixtures of three by–product wastes (including incinerated sewage sludge ash) in clay building bricks. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 77(3):345–351

    Google Scholar 

  14. Smith AS (2004) To demonstrate commercial viability of incorporating ground glass in bricks with reduced emissions and energy savings. In: The waste and resource action programme, Banbury

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shutt TC, Campbell H, Abrahams JH (1972) New building materials containing waste glass. Ceram Bull 51(1)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Liu W, Li S et al. (1991) Sintered mosaic glass from ground waste glass. Glass Technol 32(1)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Youssef NF, Abadir MF, Shater MAO (1998) Utilization of soda glass (cullet) in the manufacture of wall and floor tiles. J Eur Ceram Soc 18:1721–1727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. John S (2003) Glass addition to brick. Brickyard Road 2(4):14–18

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang L (2013) Production of bricks from waste materials – a review. Construct Build Mater 47:643–655. ISSN 0950-0618, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.043

  20. Acchar W, Vieira FA, Hotza D (2006) Effect of marble and granite sludge in clay materials. Mater Sci Eng 419:306–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dhanapandian S, Manoharan C, Gnanavel B (2008) Reformulation of bricks with addition of granite and marble wastes from sawing operations mechanical analysis. Annamalai Univ Sci J 44:51–54

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dhanapandian S, Gnanavel B (2009) An investigation on the effect of incorporation of granite and marble wastes in the production of bricks 4(9). ISSN 1819-6608

    Google Scholar 

  23. Vieira CMF, Monteiro SN (2007) Effect of grog addition on the properties and microstructure of a red ceramic body for brick production. Construct Build Mater 21:1754ñ1759

    Google Scholar 

  24. Acchar W, Vieira FA, Hotza D (2006) Effect of marble and granite sludge in clay materials.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Venkatesh G, Nandhakumar K, Sadeeshkumar R, Selvakumar G, Vaitheeswaran M (2017) Experimental investigation on cement brick with addition of quarry dust and fly ash. Int J Technol Res Eng 4(7). ISSN:2347-4718

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rohit Kumar ER, Kaushik MK (2018) Effect of Bagasse Ash and rice husk ash addition as supplementary cementitious materials on chloride penetration and diffusion in concrete mix(S). Int J Tech Res Appl 6(1):44–50. e-ISSN: 2320-8163, www.ijtra.com (Jan-Feb 2018)

  27. Ferreira JMF, Guedes PJ, Torres P, Manjate RSF, Pecchio HR et al (eds) (2004) Recycling of industrial wastes- overview about successful case studies. Applied mineralogy, ICAM- BR, Sao Paulo, p 33

    Google Scholar 

  28. Barbieri L, Andreola F, Lancellotti I, Taurino R (2013) Management of agricultural biomass wastes: Preliminary study on characterization and valorisation in clay matrix bricks. Waste Manage

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ganesan K, Rajagopal K, Thangavel K (2007) Evaluation of Bagasse Ash as supplementary cementitious material. J Cement Concrete Compos

    Google Scholar 

  30. Julián SS, Janer VC (1985) Materiales de construcción conpropriedades aislantes a base de cáscara de arroz. Informes de la Construcción, No 372, Institut des sciences de la construction Eduardo Torroja. Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hwang C-L, Huynh T-P (2015) Investigation into the use of unground rice husk ash to produce eco-friendly construction bricks. Constr Build Mater 93:335–341. ISSN 0950-0618

    Google Scholar 

  32. Damanhuri AAM, Lubis AMHS, Hariri A, Herawan SG, Roslan MHI, Hussin MSF (2020) Mechanical properties of rice husk ash brick as partial replacement of clay, vol 1529. IOP Publishing, p 042034. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1529/4/042034

  33. Rana B, Pitroda J, Jayeshkumar, Umrigar FS (2013) Sugar cane bagasse ash for eco-friendly fly ash bricks

    Google Scholar 

  34. Bhargavi B (2016) Study on concrete with sugarcane Bagasse Ash as a partial replacement of cement using HCL solution. IJSTER 05(16):3363–3369. ISSN 2319-8885

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lahamge LK, Experimental investigation on properties of recycled aggregates, bagasse ash and steel fiber on properties of concrete. Int J Res Eng Technol 2321–7308. eISSN: 2319-1163

    Google Scholar 

  36. Fogel R, Garcia RR, Oliveira R, Palacio D, Madeira L, Pereira N Jr (2005) Optimization of acid hydrolysis of sugarcane bagasse and investigations on its fermentability for the production of xylitol by Candida guilliermondii. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 122:741–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Aigbodion VS, Hassan SB, Ause T, Nyior GB (2010) Potential utilization of solid waste (Bagasse Ash). J Min Mater Charact Eng 9:67–77

    Google Scholar 

  38. Payá J, Monzó J, Borrachero MV, Díaz-Pinzón L, Ordóñez LM (2007) Sugar-cane Bagasse ash (SCBA): studies on its properties for reusing in concrete production. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 77(3):21–32

    Google Scholar 

  39. Winarno S (2019) Comparative strength and cost of rice husk concrete block. MATEC Web Conf 280:2018. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201928004002,ICSBE

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Della VP, Kuhn I, Hotza D (2002) Rice husk ash as an alternate source for active silica production. Mater Lett 57(4):818–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Soltani N, Bahrami A, Pech-Canul MI, Gonzalez LA (2015) Review on the physicochemical treatments of rice husk for production of advanced materials. Chem Eng J 264:899–935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Papademetriou MK, Dent FJ, Herath EM (2000) Bridging the rice yield gap in the Asia-Pacific Region. In: Food and agriculture organization, vol 215. Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  43. Anusuri UM, Aparna S, Kiran Kumar V, Venkatesh R (2020) Experimental study on production of cement bricks using waste materials. Int R J Eng Technol (IRJET) 07(03). e-ISSN: 2395-0056

    Google Scholar 

  44. Tonnayopas D, Tekasakul P, Jaritgnam S (2008) Effects of rice husk ash on characteristics of lightweight clay brick. In: Technology and innovation for sustainable development conference, pp 36–39

    Google Scholar 

  45. Hossain T, Sarker SK, Basak BC (2011) Utilization potential of rice husk ash as a construction material in rural areas. J Civ Eng 39(2):175–188

    Google Scholar 

  46. Afsal PK, Dev A, Mishab A, Ci E, Binky UI (2019) Experimental investigation on concrete with brick powder and fly ash as partial replacement of cement. Int J Sci Eng Res 10(3). ISSN 2229-5518

    Google Scholar 

  47. Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) (1992) Specifications for common burnt clay building bricks [fifth revision], p 1077. New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  48. Singh IB, Chaturvedi K, Morchhale RK, Vegneswaran AH (2007) Thermal treatment of toxic metals of industrial hazardous wastes with fly ash and clay. J Hazard Mater 141:215–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kumar, D.C., Vasanthi, P., Devaraju, A. (2022). Development of Agro-Industrial Wastes in Material Production. In: Palani, I.A., Sathiya, P., Palanisamy, D. (eds) Recent Advances in Materials and Modern Manufacturing. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0244-4_90

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0244-4_90

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-0243-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-0244-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics