Skip to main content

State and Tribal Land Alienation in Jharkhand: Following Colonial Footprints?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Tribe, Space and Mobilisation

Abstract

Land alienation and dispossession issues in the scheduled states are a part of critical discourse in India since Independence. There are various protective legislations and land laws passed to protect the interest of these tribal communities during colonial rule, carried forward by various state governments and central government with or without some extent of amendments in the post-colonial period. This paper studies land alienation issues in Jharkhand right from colonial period and analyses whether the phenomenon could be looked as colonial legacy in independent India.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Oraon (1992). Cited in Sharan (2005): 4442.

  2. 2.

    Wilkinson rule, 1937 is complementary rule to Chotanagpur Tenancy Act, 1908 applied in the Kolhan division of Jharkhand (the division comprises three districts, namely East Singhbhum, Seraikela-Kharsawan district and West Singhbhum). This Act was proposed to adhere to the customary tenure system specially ‘munda-manki system’ of the Kol tribes.

  3. 3.

    A Raiyat can be explained as a person who has acquired a right to hold particular land for the purpose of cultivation by himself, or by member of his family or by his hired servants and can be inherited by his successor. Mundari khunt-kattidars or Bhuinhari lands are lands made arable by clearing the forest first time by a man and which are inherited by his descendants along the male line.

  4. 4.

    Chapperbandi: it refers to the process of conversion of agricultural land into non-agricultural use by declaring it homestead land and unfit for cultivation.Chapperbandi land refers to land made unsuitable for agricultural process.

  5. 5.

    1 kath = about 40 kg of dhan (paddy).

  6. 6.

    Bhugut Bandha means transfer of the interest of tenant in his tenancy to other with whom the land is mortgaged.

References

  • Areeparampil, M. (1996). Displacements due to mining in Jharkhand. Economic and Political Weekly, 31(24), 1524–1528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behera, M. C. (2016). Development, power relations and tribal exclusion. Tribal Studies: A Journal of COATS, 4(2), 7–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behera, M. C. (2018). Resource-tribe-power complex and exclusion: A scrutiny. In R. Pramanik, U. Skoda, & L. Guzy (Eds.), Vulnerability, marginalization and culture (pp. 43–74). Concept.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behera, M. C., & Basar, J. (2018). Implementation of development schemes: A study with reference to growth of education in Arunachal Pradesh. In M. C. Behera (Ed.), Revisiting tribal studies—A glimpse after hundred years (pp. 217–234). Rawat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhengara, R. (1996). Coal mining displacement. Economic and Political Weekly, 31(11), 647–649.

    Google Scholar 

  • CES (Centre for Equity Studies). (2016). The extent and nature of individual tribal land alienation in fifth schedule states in India. Centre for Equity Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandra Bhushan, M. Z. (2008). Mining in the Sates: Jharkhand and West Bengal. In S. Banerjee (Ed.), Rich lands, poor people: Is ‘sustainable’ mining possible? State of India’s environment: Sixth citizens’ report (pp. 159–189). Centre for Science and Environment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choudhary, G. K. (2017). Land law: C.N.T, S.P.T., B.L.R., act. In S. P. Gautam Kumar Chaudhary (Ed.), Hand book on land law (pp. 1–58). Judicial Academy Jharkhand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbridge, S. (1987). Industrialisation, internal colonialism and ethnoregionalism: The Jharkhand, India, 1880–1980. Journal of Historical Geography, 13(3), 249–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Datta, B. (2014). Kahani Jharkhand Andolan Ki, 2nd ed. Crown Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Datta-Majumdar, N. (1956). The Santal: A study in culture-change. Manager of Publications, ASI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downing, T. E. (2002). Avoiding new poverty: Mining-induced displacement and resettlement (Vol. 52). International Institute for Environment and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmond, D. S. (2012, July 6). Land acquired decades ago, never taken possession of, still taxed. The Indian Express. Ranchi edition. http://indianexpress.com/article/news-archive/latest-news/land-acquired-decades-ago-never-taken-possession-of-still-taxed/

  • Ekka, A. (2011). Status of adivasis/indigenous peoples, land series-4. Aakar Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekka, A., & Asif, M. (2000). Development induced displacements and rehabilitation in Jharkhand 1951–1995: A database on its extent and nature. Indian Social Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elwin, V. (1988). A philosophy for NEFA. Director of Research. First published in 1957 and revised and enlarged in 1959 as second edition. NEFA Secretariat.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, A. S. (2014). Status of adivasis/indigenous peoples mining series-2. Aakar Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, A. (1998). Jharkhand movement: A study in the politics of regionalism. Minerva Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • GoB. (1969). The Bihar scheduled areas regulation 1969. Department of Revenue and Land Reform. http://lrc.bih.nic.in

  • GoI. (1865). A collection of acts. Ministry of Law and Justice. http://lawmin.nic.in/legislative/textofcentralacts/1865.pdf

  • GoI. (1996). The panchayats (extension to the scheduled area) act, 1996. Ministry of Panchayati Raj. Pesadarpan: pesadarpan.gov.in/documents

  • GoI. (2000). Annual report. Ministry of Rural Areas and Employment. http://ncsc.nic.in/files/Chapter6_1.pdf

  • GoI. (2009a). Annual report. Ministry of Rural Development. https://rural.nic.in/publications/annual-report

  • GoI. (2009b). Indian minerals year book (2009–10). Indian Bureau of Mine. http://ibm.nic.in

  • GoI. (2010). Indian minerals year book (2010–11). Indian Bureau of Mine. http://ibm.nic.in

  • GoI. (2011). Indian minerals year book (2011–12). Indian Bureau of Mine. http://ibm.nic.in

  • GoI. (2011). Census India, Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, Ministry of Home Affairs, India. https://censusindia.gov.in/.

  • GoI. (2012). Indian minerals year book (2012–13). Indian Bureau of Mine. http://ibm.nic.in

  • GoI. (2013a). Annual report. National Commission for Scheduled Tribes. http://ncsc.nic.in/pages/display/47-annual-reports-of-the-ncsc

  • GoI. (2013b). The right to fair compensation and transparency in land acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement act, 2013. Ministry of Law and Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • GoI. (2017). Environment clearance status query. Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change. Retrieved on January 2, 2017. http://environmentclearance.nic.in/onlineSearch.aspx

  • GoJ. (2001). Santhal Pargana industrial area development authority regulation act, 2001. Jharkhand Government, Department of Industry.

    Google Scholar 

  • GoJ. (2012–13). Jharkhand state annual plan 12th five year plan (2012–17). Planning Commission. planningcommission.nic.in

  • Jaipuriar, V. (2016, September 29). ‘No-fuss’ land deal to seal NTPC project-4000-acre plan on CM table. The Telegraph. https://www.telegraphindia.com/1160929/jsp/frontpage/story_110866.jsp

  • Lacey, W. G. (1931). Census of India 1931, Vol. VII, Bihar and Orissa, Part I. Government Printing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahiri-Dutt, K., Nesar Ahmad, N. A., & Krishnan, R. (2012). Land acquisition and dispossession. Economic & Political Weekly, 47(6), 39–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Live Mint. (2017, December 12). Jharkhand hands over 174.84 acre to Adani Power. Live Mint. Ranchi edition. http://www.livemint.com/Politics/UZVVvD3W6vX9m2VbQvqgsN/Jharkhand-hands-over-17484-acre-to-Adani-Power.html

  • Mullick, S. B. (2007). State forest policy and adivasi self rule in Jharkhand. In C. K. Paty (Ed.), Forest, government and tribe (pp. 18–29). Concept Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nathan, D., & Xaxa, V. (Eds.). (2012). Social exclusion and adverse inclusion—Development and deprivation of adivasis in India. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oraon, B. (1992). Report on land alienation in Chotanagpur and Santhal Pargana. Unpublished manuscript. Cited in Sharan, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oraon, P. C. (1993). A report on problem of land alienation of tribals in Chotanagpur and Santhal Pargana. Bihar Tribal Welfare Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasad, B. M. (2007). SanthalPargana tenancy manual. Malhotra Bros.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, N. (2003). Life and livelihood in Santhal Parganas: Does the right to a livelihood exist? Economic and Political Weekly, 38(39), 4081–4084.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, A. K. (2003). Jharkhand: Internal colonialism. In R. D. Munda & S. Bosu Mullick (Eds.), The Jharkhand movement: Indigenous peoples’ struggle for autonomy in India (pp. 78–85). International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, P. R. (2013). Hand book on Chotanagpur tenancy laws, 5th ed. Rajpal & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (2011). Representing tribe—The Ho of Singhbhum under colonial rule. Concept Publishing Company Pvt. Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharan, R. (2005). Alienation and restoration of tribal land in Jharkhand. Economic and Political Weekly, 40(41), 4443–4446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidyarthi, L. P. (1972). Problem and prospects of tribal development in India. Indian Anthropologist, 2(2), 80–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xaxa, V. (2018). Exploring ideas of autonomy through tribal movements in eastern India. In M. C. Behera (Ed.), Revisiting tribal studies—A glimpse after hundred years (pp. 61–69). Rawat.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sinha, A.A., Behera, H.C., Behura, A.K. (2022). State and Tribal Land Alienation in Jharkhand: Following Colonial Footprints?. In: Behera, M.C. (eds) Tribe, Space and Mobilisation. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0059-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0059-4_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-0058-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-0059-4

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics