Skip to main content

Assessment Reforms in Singapore

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Education in Singapore

Part of the book series: Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects ((EDAP,volume 66))

  • 2805 Accesses

Abstract

The education system in Singapore has been transformed since its independence from colonial British rule in 1965. Reforms have occurred in four distinct phases: the survival phase; the efficiency phase; the ability-driven phase, and currently its values-driven and student-centredness phase. Each phase of education has been supported and driven by corresponding assessment reform. In the past few years, there has been a distinct effort to shift assessment purposes and discourse away from high stakes testing for placement and stratification, towards using assessment to signal and support learning within and beyond schools. Three assessment reforms are examined in this chapter—the reduction in emphasis on examinations in primary schools in 2008, the shift away from norm-referenced assessment in the high stakes national examination for primary students (announced in 2016), and the changes to assessment and streaming in secondary schools announced in 2018. These reforms demonstrate the tight alignment between policymaking and school implementation and offer insights into the complexities in grappling with tensions between maintaining rigour and control in high stakes summative assessment against transparency of assessment standards for use in formative assessment in schools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barr, M. D., & Skrbiš, Z. (2008). Constructing Singapore: Elitism, ethnicity and the nation-building project. Copenhagen, Denmark: Nordic Institute of Asian Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellows, T. (2009). Meritocracy and the Singapore political system. Asian Journal of Political Science, 17(1), 24–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bray, M., & Lykins, C. (2012). Shadow education: Private supplementary tutoring and its implications for policy makers in Asia. Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Asian Development Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckles, S., Schug, M., & Watts, M. (2001). A national survey of state assessment practices in the social studies. Social Studies, 92(4), 141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheah, Y. M. (1998). The examination culture and its impact on literacy innovations: The case of Singapore. Language and Education, 12(3), 192–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deneen, C., Fulmer, G. W., Brown, G. T. L., Tan, K., Leong, W. S., & Tay, H. Y. (2019). Value, practice and proficiency: Teachers’ complex relationship with assessment for learning. Teacher and Teacher Education, 80, 39–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu, G. (2010). Speech by Ms Grace Fu, Senior Minister of State, Ministry of National Development and Ministry of Education, at the PERI Holistic Assessment Seminar 2010 on Tuesday, 13 July 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goh, C. T. (1997). Shaping our future: Thinking schools, learning nation. Singapore Government Press Release. Speech by Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong at the Opening of the 7th International Conference on Thinking, 2 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopinathan, S. (2001). Globalisation, the state and education policy in Singapore. J. Tan, S. Gopinathan, & W.K. Ho. (Eds.) Challenges facing the Singapore education system today. Singapore: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, K., & Clarke, M. (2003). High-stakes assessment in England and Singapore. Theory into Practice, 42(1), 66–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawe, E. (2002). Assessment in a pre-service teacher education programme: The rhetoric and the practice of standards-based assessment. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 30(1), 93–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, L. C. (2014). Meritocracy, tracking, and elitism: Differentiated citizenship education in the United States and Singapore. The Social Studies, 105(1), 29–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, S., Chan, M., Rahim, R., Kwek, D., Khin, M. A., Loo, S. C., Sheng, Y. Z., & Luo, W. (2013). Assessment and the logic of instructional practice in Secondary 3 English and mathematics classrooms in Singapore. Review of Education, 1(1), 57–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, D., Towndrow, P., & Koh, K. (2009). The logic of confidence and the social economy of assessment reform in Singapore: A new institutionalist perspective. In E. Grigorenko, Assessment of abilities and competencies in the era of globalization. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klenowski, V. (2009). Assessment for learning revisited: An Asia-Pacific perspective.Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 15(3), 263–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koh, K., & Luke, A. (2009). Authentic and conventional assessment in Singapore schools: An empirical study of teacher assignments and student work. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 16(3), 291–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H. L. (2004). Our future of opportunity and promise. Singapore Government Press Release. Address by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong at the 2004 National Day Rally at the University Cultural Centre, National University of Singapore, 22 August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leong, S. C. (2020). Elements of a Standards-referenced Assessment. In SEAB Assessment in Singapore: Getting Ready for the 2020s (pp. 11–16). Singapore: Singapore Examinations and Assessment Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leong, W. S., & Tan, K. (2014). What (more) can, and should, assessment do for learning? Observations from ‘successful learning context’ in Singapore. Curriculum Journal, 25(4), 593–619, 1.035.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, L. (2013). Meritocracy, elitism, and egalitarianism: A preliminary and provisional assessment of Singapore’s primary education review. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 33(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim-Ratnam, C. (2013). Tensions in defining quality pre-school education: the Singapore context. Educational Review

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (2019). Updates to PSLE 2021 scoring system—enabling students to progress, regardless of starting points. https://www.moe.gov.sg/news/press-releases/updates-to-psle-2021-scoring-system--enabling-students-to-progress--regardless-of-starting-points

  • Ng, P. T. (2005). Students’ perception of change in the Singapore education system. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 3(1), 77–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, P. T. (2008). Educational reform in Singapore: From quantity to quality. Educational research for policy and practice, 7(1), 5-15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ong, Y. K. (2019) Speech by Mr Ong Ye Kung, Minister for Education, at the Committee of Supply Debate on 5 March 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • PERI Report. (2009). Report of the Primary Education Review and Implementation Committee. Singapore: Ministry of Education

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahmat, F. A. & Wong, H. M. (2017, June). Analysing the nature of feedback in classrooms in Singapore. Paper presented at the 7th Redesigning Pedagogy International Conference, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratnam-Lim, C., & Tan, K. H. K. (2015). Large-scale implementation of formative assessment practices in an examination oriented culture. Assessment in Education, 22(1), 61–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, D. R. (1987). Specifying and promulgating achievement standards. Oxford review of education, 13(2), 191-209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singapore Examinations and Assessment Branch. (2020). Primary School Leaving Examination (PSLE) 2021: Standards Referenced Assessment. https://www-seab-gov-sg-admin.cwp.sg/docs/default-source/research-and-presentation-articles/demystifying-national-examinations/psle-poster-17jan2019.jpg. Accessed on 14 November 2020.

  • Stiggins, R. J. (1995). Assessment literacy for the 21st century. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(3), 238–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, C. (2006). Creating thinking schools through “Knowledge and Inquiry”: The curriculum challenges for Singapore. The Curriculum Journal, 17(1), 89–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, K. H. K. (2007). The case for qualitative approaches to assessment. In K. H. K. Tan (Ed.), Alternative Assessment in Schools: A Qualitative Approach. Singapore, Pearson Education South Asia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, K. (2008). Meritocracy and Elitism in a Global City: Ideological Shifts in Singapore. International Political Science Review, 29(7), 7–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, K. H. K. (2011). Assessment for learning in Singapore: Unpacking its meanings and identifying some areas for improvement. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 10(2), 91–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, K. H. K. (2011). Assessment for learning reform in Singapore—Quality, sustainable or threshold? In R. Berry & B. Adamson (Eds.), Assessment reform in education: Ploicy and practice (pp. 75–88). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, C. Y. (2013a). Organisational legitimacy of the Singapore Ministry of Education. Oxford Review of Education, 39(5), 590–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, K. H. K. (2013b). A framework for assessment for learning: Implications for feedback practices within and beyond the gap. International Scholarly Research Notices.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, K. H. K., & Deneen, C. C. (2015). Aligning and sustaining meritocracy, curriculum and assessment validity in Singapore. Assessment Matters, 8, 31–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, K. H. K. (2017). Asking questions of (what) assessment (should do) for learning: The case of bite-sized assessment for learning in Singapore. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 16(2), 189–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1994). Assessment for measurement or standards: The peril and promise of large scale assessment reform. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 231–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teng, A. (2016, July 14). PSLE scoring revamp: T-score replaced by eight wider grade bands in 2021, Straits Times, Available at https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/education/psle-scoring-revamp-t-score-replaced-by-eight-wider-grade-bands-in-2021

  • Volante, L. DeLuca, C. Harju-Luukkainen, H. Heritage, M. Schneider, C. Stobart, G. Tan, K. H. K., & Wyatt-Smith, C. (2020). Synergy and tension between large-scale and classroom assessment: International trends. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 0(0), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yue, L. S., & Chow, H. K. (2020). Standards-referenced Assessment. In SEAB Assessment in Singapore: Getting Ready for the 2020s (pp. 1–7). Singapore: Singapore Examinations and Assessment Board.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kelvin Heng Kiat Tan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tan, K.H.K. (2022). Assessment Reforms in Singapore. In: Lee, YJ. (eds) Education in Singapore. Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects, vol 66. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9982-5_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9982-5_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-9981-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-9982-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics