Skip to main content

Diagnostic Modalities in TB Spine: Clinical Laboratory Diagnosis and Technological Advancements

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Tuberculosis of the Spine
  • 372 Accesses

Abstract

Tuberculosis (TB) remains a major global health burden. There still remains a large gap between the notified and estimated incident cases. Extrapulmonary TB represents 15% of all TB cases, and the diagnosis is more challenging due to the paucity of the organism. Smear microscopy is often insensitive, and culture methods are prolonged.

Spinal tuberculosis is a destructive form of tuberculosis. It accounts for approximately half of all cases of musculoskeletal tuberculosis. Spinal tuberculosis is more common in children and young adults. Characteristically, there is destruction of the intervertebral disk space and the adjacent vertebral bodies, collapse of the spinal elements, and anterior wedging leading to kyphosis and gibbus formation.

The gold standard method of diagnosis of tuberculosis is the growth of Mycobacterium in culture specimens from the infected tissue and is considered the single most confirmatory diagnostic test for spinal TB. However, due to its very poor sensitivity, histopathological studies demonstrating classical granulomas and staining of smears to identify acid fast bacilli (AFB) are considered as reference standards for all other diagnostic modalities. Apart from indirect serological markers of inflammation, immunological tests have also been used with varied results. Molecular diagnostics are frequently being used because of its rapidity.

The engineering of antigens/antibody nanocarriers represents an exciting front in the field of diagnostics, potentially flagging the way toward development of better diagnostics for TB.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Chauhan A, Gupta BB. Spinal tuberculosis. Indian Acad Clin Med. 2007;8:110–4.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Naim-ur-Rahman. Atypical forms of spinal tuberculosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1980;62-B:162–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Talbot JC, Bismil Q, Saralaya D, Newton D, Frizzel RM, Shaw DL. Musculoskeletal tuberculosis in bradford–a 6-year review. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2007;89:405–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tuli SM. Historical aspects of Pott's disease (spinal tuberculosis) management. Eur Spine J. 2012;22:529–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. World Health Organization. WHO report on the proposed post-2015 TB Strategy and targets. Available from: http://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/EB134/B134_12-en.pdf?uaZ1.

  6. Golden MP, Vikram HR. Extrapulmonary tuberculosis: an overview. Am Fam Physician. 2005;72(9):1761–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kotil K, Alan MS, Bilge T. Medical management of pott disease in the thoracic and lumbar spine: a prospective clinical study. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007;6:222–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cormican L, Hammal R, Messenger J, Milburn HJ. Current difficulties in the diagnosis and management of spinal tuberculosis. Postgrad Med J. 2006;82:46–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pandita A, Madhuripan N, Hurtado RM, Dhamoon A. Back pain and oedematous schmorl node: a diagnostic dilemma. BMJ Case Rep. 2017;2017 https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2017-219904.

  10. World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report 2019. World Health Organization; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  11. World Health Organization. TB facts. Available at: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs104/en/

  12. World Health Organization. .https://www.who.int/tb/publications/2015/end_tb_essential.pdf?ua=1

  13. WHO Global TB Report 2020. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/336069/9789240013131-eng.pdf

  14. McLain RF, Isada C. Spinal tuberculosis deserves a place on the radar screen. Cleve Clin J Med. 2004;71(537–539):543–9.

    Google Scholar 

  15. World Health Organization. High-priority target product profiles for new tuberculosis diagnostic. Report of a consensus meeting. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/135617/WHO_HTM_TB_2014.18_eng.pdf?sequence=1

  16. Boachie-Adjei O, Squillante RG. Tuberculosis of the spine. Orthop Clin North Am. 1996;27:95e103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Schirmer P, Renault CA, Holodniy M. Is spinal tuberculosis contagious? Int J Infect Dis. 2010;14:e659e66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee KY. Comparison of pyogenic spondylitis and tuberculous spondylitis. AsianSpine J. 2014;8:216–23.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Raviglione MC. Tuberculosis. In: Kasper D, Fauci A, Hauser S, Longo D, Jameson J, Loscalzo J, editors. Harrison’s principles of internal medicine. 19th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ansari S, Amanullah MF, Ahmad K, Rauniyar RK. Pott’s spine: diagnostic imaging modalities and technology advancements. N Am J Med Sci. 2013;5:404e11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sester M, Sotgiu G, Lange C, et al. Interferon-gamma release assays for the diagnosis of active tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Respir J. 2011;37(1):100–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Norbis L, Miotto P, Alagna R, Cirillo DM. Tuberculosis: lights and shadows in the current diagnostic landscape. New Microbiol. 2013;36(2):111–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fuentes Ferrer M, Gutierrez Torres L, Ayala Ramirez O, et al. Tuberculosis of the spine. A systematic review of case series. Int Orthop. 2012;36(2):221–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Public Health England. Tuberculosis in England: 2020 report (presenting data to end of 2019) [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Dec 28]. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/943356/TB_Annual_Report_2020.pdf

  25. Central TB Division Government of India. India TB Report 2020 [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Dec 28]. Available from: https://tbcindia.gov.in/WriteReadData/l892s/India TB Report 2020.pdf

  26. Sternbach G. Percivall Pott: tuberculous spondylitis. J Emerg Med [Internet]. 1996;14(1):79–83. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0736467995020535

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Shetty A, Kanna R, Rajasekaran S. TB spine–current aspects on clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management options. Seminars in Spine Surgery 2016;28(3):150–162.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gupta AK, Singh A, Singh S. Diagnosis of tuberculosis: nanodiagnostics approaches. Nano Bio Medicine. 2019:261–83.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sharma SK, Mohan A. Tuberculosis: from an incurable scourge to a curable disease–journey over a Millennium. Indian J Med Res. 2013;137:455e493.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Winn W, Allen S, Janda W, et al. Koneman’s Color atlas and textbook of diagnostic microbiology. 6th ed; 2006. p. 1064e1124.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kapil A. Ananthanarayan & Paniker’s textbook of microbiology. 9th ed. chennai: Universities Press (india) Pvt Ltd; 2013. p. 352.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Purohit M, Mustafa T. Laboratory diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) in resource- constrained setting: state of the art, challenges and the need. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9:EE01eEE06.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Liu KT, Su WJ, Perng RP. Clinical utility of polymerase chain reaction for diagnosis of smear-negative pleural tuberculosis. J Chin Med Assoc. 2007;70:148e151.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Haldar S, Bose M, Chakrabarti P, et al. Improved laboratory diagnosis of tuberculosis and the Indian experience. Tuberculosis. 2011;91:414e426. 42. Derese Y, Hailu E, Assefa T, et al. Comparison of PCR with standard culture of fine needle aspiration samples in the diagnosis of tuberculosis lymphadenitis. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2012;6:53e57.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Pfyffer GE, Palicova F. Mycobacterium: general characteristics, laboratory detection, and procedures. In: Versalovic J, Carroll KC, Funke G, Jorgensec JH, Landry ML, Warnock DW, eds. Mannual of clinical microbiology. 10th ed. ASN press; 2011:472e502.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Jain AK, Jena SK, Singh MP, Dhammi IK, Ramachadran VG, Dev G. Evaluation of clinico-radiological, bacteriological, serological, molecular and histological diagnosis of osteoarticular tuberculosis. Indian J Orthop. 2008 Apr;42(2):173–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Garg RK, Somvanshi DS. Spinal tuberculosis: a review. J Spinal Cord Med [Internet]. 2011;34(5):440–54. https://doi.org/10.1179/2045772311Y.0000000023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Khanna K, Sabharwal S. Spinal tuberculosis: a comprehensive review for the modern spine surgeon. Spine J. 2019;19(11):1858–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. A new tool to diagnose tuberculosis: the Xpert MTB/RIF Assay [Internet]. [cited 2021 Jan 1]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/tb/publications/factsheets/pdf/xpertmtb-rifassayfactsheet_final.pdf

  40. Held M, Laubscher M, Zar HJ, Dunn RN. GeneXpert polymerase chain reaction for spinal tuberculosis: an accurate and rapid diagnostic test. Bone Joint J. 2014 Oct;96-B(10):1366.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Solanki AM, Basu S, Biswas A, Roy S, Banta A. Sensitivity and specificity of gene Xpert in the diagnosis of spinal tuberculosis: a prospective controlled clinical Study. Glob spine J. 2020 Aug;10(5):553–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Sharma K, Meena RK, Aggarwal A, Chhabra R. Multiplex PCR as a novel method in the diagnosis of spinal tuberculosis–a pilot study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) [Internet]. 2017 Mar 21;159(3):503–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-016-3065-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Sharma K, Sharma A, Sharma SK, Sen RK, Dhillon MS, Sharma M. Does multiplex polymerase chain reaction increase the diagnostic percentage in osteoarticular tuberculosis? A prospective evaluation of 80 cases. Int Orthop. 2012 Feb;36(2):255–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Wang Y, Yu L, Kong X, Sun L. Application of nanodiagnostics in point-of-care tests for infectious diseases. Int J Nanomedicine. 2017;12:4789–803.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rajat R. Verma .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Verma, R.R., Marya, S. (2022). Diagnostic Modalities in TB Spine: Clinical Laboratory Diagnosis and Technological Advancements. In: Dhatt, S.S., Kumar, V. (eds) Tuberculosis of the Spine. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9495-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9495-0_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-9494-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-9495-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics