Skip to main content

Debunking Intercultural Competence

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Interculturality Between East and West

Abstract

Interculturality is a complex notion that can mean different things to different people. What is more it can be tackled and discussed in many different ways. This chapter confronts what the authors consider to be imaginaries and misconceptions of intercultural competence today. These elements are opposed by summarizing points made in the previous chapters: There is a need to (1) place multiplicity at the centre of interculturality, (2) go beyond ‘Western’ discourses of culture (e.g. ‘Western orders’ of democracy), (3) consider differilitudes (the inconsistent but omnipresent enmeshment of difference and similitude), (4) take the ‘Collective ego’ into account (the hyphen between us and them), (5) (Re-)consider imaginaries and (6) Work from the continuum of failure–success. The authors also take notes of the main problems faced by those using the most ‘popular’ models of intercultural competence, available on the academic market and suggest ways of circumventing them. The chapter ends on a suggestion: maybe everybody is interculturally competent but we just don’t know it…

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z., & Raud, R. (2016). Practices of selfhood. Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergson, H. (2002). Key writings. Continuum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen, T. H. (2001). Between universalism and relativism: ‘A critique of the UNESCO concept of culture’. In J. K. Cowan, M.-B. Dembour, & R. A. Wilson (Eds.), Culture and rights. Anthropological perspectives (pp. 127–148). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévi-Strauss, C. (1952). Race and history. UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maffesoli, M. (1997). The time of the tribes. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nynäs, P. (2001). Bakom Guds rug. En hermeneutisk ansats till interkulturell kommunikation och förståelse I industriella project. Åbo Akademi University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagan, C. (2006). The varieties of scientific experience: A personal view of the search for god. Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2007). Identity and violence: The illusion of destiny. Penguin.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dervin, F., Sude, Yuan, M., Chen, N. (2022). Debunking Intercultural Competence. In: Interculturality Between East and West. Encounters between East and West. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8492-0_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8492-0_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-8491-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-8492-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics