Abstract
The direct and inverse regression-based estimators are used for linear statistical calibration. The direct regression finds the relationship between the dependent and independent variables, and inverse regression uses it for calibration. When both the dependent and independent variables in linear calibration are subjected to measurement errors, the resultant estimators become biased and inconsistent. Assuming the availability of replicated observations on the independent variable, a calibration estimator is presented which has zero large sample asymptotic bias. The large sample efficiency properties of the calibration estimators are derived and analyzed assuming the random errors are not necessarily normally distributed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aitchison, J. A. (1977). Calibration problem in statistical diagnosis: The system transfer problem. Biometrika, 64(3), 461–472.
Bartlett, J. W., & Keogh, R. H. (2018). Bayesian correction for covariate measurement error: A frequentist evaluation and comparison with regression calibration. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 27(6), 1695–1708.
Berkson, J. (1969). Estimation of a linear function for a calibration line: Consideration of a recent proposal. Technometrics, 11, 649–660.
Blas, B., Bolfarine, H., & Lachos, V. H. (2013). Statistical analysis of controlled calibration model with replicates. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 83(5), 939–959.
Brown, P. J. (1982). Multivariate calibration. With discussion. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 44(3), 287–321.
Brown, P. J. (1993). Measurement error, regression and calibration. Oxford Statistical Science Series. The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press.
Brown, P. J., & Sundberg, R. (1987). Confidence and conflict in multivariate calibration. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 49(1), 46–57.
Brown, P. J., & Sundberg, R. (1989). Prediction diagnostics and updating in multivariate calibration. Biometrika, 76(2), 349–361.
Cheng, C., & Van Ness, J. W. (1999). Statistical regression with measurement error. Arnold.
Dunsmore, I. R. (1968). A Bayesian approach to calibration. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 30, 396–405.
Friedland, B. (1977). On the calibration problem. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, AC-22(6), 899–905.
Fuller, W. A. (1987). Measurement error models. Wily.
Gleser, L. J. (1992). The importance of assessing measurement reliability in multivariate regression. Journal of American Statistical Association, 87(419), 696–707.
Gleser, L. J. (1993). Estimators of slopes in linear errors-in-variables regression models when the predictors have known reliability matrix. Statistic& Probability Letters, 17, 113–121.
Gray, C. M., Carroll, R. J., Lentjes, M. A. H., & Keogh, R. H. (2019). Correcting for measurement error in fractional polynomial models using Bayesian modelling and regression calibration, with an application to alcohol and mortality. Biometrical Journal, 61(3), 558–573.
Gregory, A. W., & Smith, G. W. (1993). Statistical aspects of calibration in macroeconomics. In Handbook of statistics. Econometrics (Vol. 11, pp. 703–719)
Halperin, M. (1970). On inverse estimation in linear regression. Technometrics, 12, 727–736.
Han, Y., Liu, W., Bretz, F., Wan, F., & Yang, P. (2016). Statistical calibration and exact one-sided simultaneous tolerance intervals for polynomial regression. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 168, 90–96.
Huang, S. Y. H. (2005). Regression calibration using response variables in linear models. Statistica Sinica, 15(3), 685–696.
Hunter, W. G., & Lamboy, W. F. (1981). A Bayesian analysis of the linear calibration problem. Technometrics, 23(4), 323–350.
Joseph, V. R., & Yan, H. (2015). Engineering-driven statistical adjustment and calibration. Technometrics, 57(2), 257–267.
Krutchkoff, R. G. (1967). Classical and inverse regression methods of calibration. Technometrics, 9, 425–439.
Krutchkoff, R. G. (1969). Classical and inverse regression methods of calibration in extrapolation. Technometrics, 11, 605–608.
Krutchkoff, R. G. (1971). The calibration problem and closeness. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 1(1), 87–95.
Lee, S., & Yum, B. (1989). Large-sample comparisons of calibration procedures when both measurements are subject to errors: The unreplicated case. Communications in Statistics, Theory and Methods, 18, 3821–3840.
Lwin, T., & Maritz, J. S. (1980). A note on the problem of statistical calibration. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series C, 29(2), 135–141.
Lwin, T., & Spiegelman, C. H. (1986). Calibration with working standards. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series C, 35(3), 256–261.
Minder, C. E., & Whitney, J. B. (1975). A likelihood analysis of the linear calibration problem. Technometrics, 17(4), 463–471.
Misquitta, P., & Ruymgaart, F. H. (2005). Some results on nonparametric calibration. Communications in Statistics, Theory and Methods, 34(7), 1605–1616.
Osborne, C. (1991). Statistical calibration: A review. International Statistical Review, 59, 309–336.
Pepper, M. P. G. (1973). A calibration of instruments with non-random errors. Technometrics, 15, 587–599.
Rao, C. R., Toutenburg, H., Shalabh, & Heumann, C. (2008). Linear models and generalizations: Least squares and alternatives. Springer.
Salter, J. M., & Williamson, D. (2016). A comparison of statistical emulation methodologies for multi-wave calibration of environmental models. Environmetrics, 27(8), 507–523.
Sansó, B., & Forest, C. (2009). Statistical calibration of climate system properties. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series C, Applied Statistics, 58(4), 485–503.
Scheffé, H. (1973). A statistical theory of calibration. Annals of Statistics, 1, 1–37.
Shalabh, & Toutenburg, H. (2006). Consequence of departure from normality on the properties of calibration estimators. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 136(12), 4385–4396.
Skrondal, A., & Kuha, J. (2012). Improved regression calibration. Psychometrika, 77(4), 649–669.
Spiegelman, D. (2013). Regression calibration in air pollution epidemiology with exposure estimated by spatio-temporal modeling. Environmetrics, 24(8), 521–524.
Spiegelman, D., Logan, R., & Grove, D. (2011). Regression calibration with heteroscedastic error variance. International Journal of Biostatistics, 7(1), 1–34. Article 4
Srivastava, A. K., & Shalabh. (1997). Asymptotic efficiency properties of least squares estimation in ultrastructural model. TEST, 6(2), 419–431.
Strand, M., Sillau, S., Grunwald, G. K., & Rabinovitch, N. (2015). Regression calibration with instrumental variables for longitudinal models with interaction terms, and application to air pollution studies. Environmetrics, 26(6), 393–405.
Sun, Z., Kuczek, T., & Zhu, Y. (2014). Statistical calibration of qRT-PCR, microarray and RNA-Seq gene expression data with measurement error models. Annals of Applied Statistics, 8(2), 1022–1044.
Tallis, G. M. (1969). Note on a calibration problem. Biometrika, 56, 505–508.
Wang, C. Y., Hsu, L., Feng, Z. D., & Prentice, R. L. (1997). Regression calibration in failure time regression. Biometrics, 53(1), 131–145.
Williams, E. J. (1969). A note on regression methods in calibration. Technometrics, 11, 189–192.
Williford, W. O., Carter, M. C., & Field, J. E. (1979). A further look at the Bayesian approach to calibration. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 9(1), 47–67.
Yu, M., & Nan, B. (2010). Regression calibration in semiparametric accelerated failure time models. Biometrics, 66(2), 405–414.
Yum, B., & Lee, S. (1991). Calibration procedures when both measurements are subject to error: A comparative simulation study of the unreplicated case. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 20, 411–420.
Acknowledgements
The author gratefully acknowledges the support from the MATRICS project from Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB), Department of Science and Technology, Government of India.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
Let us first introduce the following notation
where \(\otimes \) denotes the Kronecker product operator of matrices and e denotes a column vector with all elements unity and its suffix indicating the number of elements in it.
The following properties of these matrices may be noted:
Further, if Z denotes a \(m\times 1\) random vector such that its elements are independently and identically distributed with mean 0, variance \(\sigma ^2_z\), third moment \(\sigma ^3_z \gamma _{1z}\) and fourth moment \(\sigma ^4_z (\gamma _{2z} + 3)\), we have
where G and H are \(m\times m\) symmetric matrices with nonstochastic elements and \(*\) denotes the Hadamard product operator of matrices.
If we define
it is observed that all these quantities are of order \(O_p(1)\) where \(u=(u_1,u_2,\ldots ,u_n)\) and \(v=(v_{11},v_{12},\ldots ,v_{np})\) are column vectors of order \(n\times 1\) and \(np \times 1\) respectively.
Now, from (2.6), we can express
where \(s^2\) and \(\lambda _x\) are defined in (3.1).
Expanding and retaining terms to order \(O_p(n^{-1/2})\), we get
where
Similarly, from (2.7), we obtain
where
Likewise, it is easy to see from (2.8) that
where
Observing that
the LSABs of \(\hat{X}_c\), \(\hat{X}_I\) and \(\hat{X}_c^*\) to \(O(n^{-1/2})\) are given by
which are the results stated in Theorem 1.
By virtue of the distributional properties of u and v, the following results are obtained:
and
where repeated use has been made of (5.1) and (5.2)
Utilizing these results and we obtain the LSAVs to order \(O(n^{-1})\) as follows:
which gives the results mentioned in Theorem 2.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Shalabh (2022). Statistical Linear Calibration in Data with Measurement Errors. In: Hanagal, D.D., Latpate, R.V., Chandra, G. (eds) Applied Statistical Methods. ISGES 2020. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 380. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7932-2_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7932-2_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-7931-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-7932-2
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)