Abstract
This chapter explores the strategies that are related to culturally responsive pedagogy (CRP) to facilitate the integration of indigenous technology in teaching design skills in Technology Education classes. Technology teachers are advised to consider indigenous pedagogy (IP) as that will accommodate learners from both indigenous and non-indigenous contexts; curricula and teaching have a colonial history of excluding indigenous knowledge. Indigenous pedagogy is based on experiential and practical learning which is dominant in indigenous communities. It is therefore a pedagogy through which the young ones are taught and shown how to perform tasks in their localities. The specific indigenous pedagogy framing the discussions in this chapter is culturally relevant. This study revealed that culturally relevant pedagogy has a role to play in the teaching of design skills in Technology Education, hence it can help Technology teachers to make the learning of Technology relevant to indigenous learners who are mostly switched off from learning by the conventional pedagogies. The findings of the study revealed that the use of CRP can promote the integration of indigenous knowledge and artefacts in the teaching of design skills. The findings suggest a review of the current design method to accommodate indigenous as well as non-indigenous learners. Therefore, we suggest an indigenous technology-based design process (ITbDP) which can transform the current conventional approaches in the teaching of Technology.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ankiewicz, P. J., & De Swardt, A. E. (2001). Technology education: Principles, methods and techniques of Technology Education II. University of Johannesburg.
Biraimah, L. B. (2016). Moving beyond a deconstructive past to a decolonised and inclusive future: The role of ubuntu-style education in providing culturally relevant pedagogy for Namibia. Internationally Review of Education, 62(1), 45–62.
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2003). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods. Pearson.
Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods. Oxford University Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson.
De Vries, M. J. (1996). Technology education: Beyond the technology is applied science paradigm. Journal of Technology Education, 8(1), 7–15.
Department of Basic Education. (2011). Curriculum and assessment policy statement Grades 7–9: Technology. Government Printers.
Doyle, L., & Hill, R. (2008). Our children, our future: Achieving improved primary and secondary education outcomes for indigenous students: An overview of investment opportunities and approaches. AMP Foundation. Retrieved May 1, 2014, from http://www.amp.au/ampfoundation.
Dyson, L. E. (2002). Designing for a culturally affirming indigenous computer literacy course. Paper presented at the ASCILITE annual conference of Australasian society for computers in learning in tertiary education, Auckland, New Zealand.
Esjeholm, B. T. (2015). Design knowledge interplayed with student creativity in D&T (Design & Technology) projects. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 25, 227–243.
Fraser, J. D. C. (2006). Mediation of learning. In M. M. Nieman, & R. B. Monyai (Eds.), The educator as mediator of learning. Van Schaik.
Gay, R. L., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. W. (2011). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications. Pearson.
Green, B. A. (2010). Understand schema, understand difference. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 37(2), 133–145.
Gumbo, M. T. (2012). Claiming indigeneity through the school curriculum, with specific reference to Technology Education. African Education Review, 9(3), 434–451.
Gumbo, M. T. (2014). An action research pilot study on the integration of indigenous technology in Technology Education. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(10), 386–392.
Gumbo, M. T. (2015). Indigenous technology in Technology Education curricula and teaching. In P. J. Williams, A. Jones, & C. Bunting (Eds.), Contemporary issues in Technology Education: The future of Technology Education. Springer.
Gumbo, M. (2016). A model for indigenizing the university curriculum: A quest for educational relevance. In V. Msila, & M. T. Gumbo (Eds.), Africanising the curriculum: Indigenous perspectives and theories. Sun Press.
Howard, T. C. (2003). Culturally relevant pedagogy: Ingredients for critical teacher reflection. Theory into Practice, 42(3), 195–202.
Maluleke, R., & Gumbo, M. T. (2019). A cultural responsive pedagogy for teaching design skills in Technology: An indigenous perspective. Paper presented at 27th annual conference of the South African association for research in mathematics, science and technology education (SAARMSTE), Durban, South Africa.
Mathers, N., Fox, N., & Hunn, A. (1998). Using interviews in a research project. Trent Focus Group.
Moalosi, R., Popovic, V., & Hickling-Hudson, A. (2007). Product analysis based on Botswana’s postcolonial socio-cultural perspective. International Journal of Design, 1(2), 35–43.
Moriarty, J. (2011). Qualitative methods overview. School for Social Care Research.
Neuman, W. L. (2011). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Pearson.
Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., Nicholls, C. M., & Ormston, R. (2013). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. Sage.
Rutland, M. (2009). Art and design and design and technology: Is there creativity in the designing? Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 14(1), 56–67.
Singh, N., & Reyhner, J. (2013). Indigenous knowledge and pedagogy for indigenous children. In J. Reyhner (Ed.), Honoring our children: Culturally appropriate approaches for teaching indigenous students. Northern Arizona University.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage.
Veak, T. (2000). Whose technology? Whose modernity? Questioning Feenberg’s questioning technology. Science, Technology & Human Values, 25(2), 226–237.
Venter, E. (2004). The nation of ubuntu and communalism in African educational discourse. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 23, 149–160.
Weegar, M. A., & Pacis, D. (2012). A comparison of two theories of learning: Behaviorism and construction of applied to face-to-face and online learning. Paper presented at the E-leader, Manila, Philippines.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Maluleke, R., Gumbo, M.T. (2022). Applying a Culturally Responsive Pedagogy to Promote Indigenous Technology in Teaching Design Skills. In: Williams, P.J., von Mengersen, B. (eds) Applications of Research in Technology Education. Contemporary Issues in Technology Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7885-1_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7885-1_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-7884-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-7885-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)