Abstract
This paper presents the changes in organisational practices of third-sector organisations (TSOs), which are the immediate partners of corporations in implementing CSR projects. The paper employs the theoretical framework of institutional isomorphisms—coercive, mimetic, and normative. The data has been collected through in-depth interviews with eleven officials from six TSOs, five officials from three corporations, and two academicians from two universities located in Mumbai and Delhi, India. The findings are presented through five key themes: changes in planning and designing of CSR projects, implementation, monitoring, reporting and documentation, and funding. These changes have taken place in TSOs through coercion, mimicking the other organisations, or by following the dominated norm in their environment to gain legitimacy and secure funds. The newly institutionalised practices by corporations have helped TSOs achieve their vision, in turn leading to sustainable businesses. However, TSOs have faced challenges in imbibing these practices. The TSOs have been compelled by corporations to adopt business practices so that they can produce calculated results. There has been a continuous tussle between the corporations and the TSOs in implementing some of these new practices imposed by the corporations. The paper concludes that TSOs have to retain their autonomy and understanding of ground realities, without which they become an extension of the corporate funder. Further, corporate and TSOs require an understanding of each other’s work culture to develop mutual respect and work towards the goal of sustainable development of the communities.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Third-sector organisation (TSO) is an umbrella term for organisations, which neither belong to the public sector (the state) nor to the private sector (profit-making organisations) (Defourny 2013).
References
AL-Tabbaa O, Leach D, March J (2014) Collaboration between nonprofit and business sectors: a framework to guide strategy development for nonprofit organizations. Voluntas 25:657–678. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-013-9357-6
Ambasta A (2017) ITC Limited’s mission Sunehra Kal: two decades of transforming lives and landscapes. In: Mitra N, Schmidpeter R (eds) Corporate social responsibility in India: cases and developments after the legal mandate. CSR, sustainability, ethics & governance. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 97–116
Arenas D, Lozano JM, Albareda L (2009) The role of NGOs in CSR: mutual perceptions among stakeholders. J Bus Ethics 88(1):175–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0109-x
Austin JE (2000) Strategic collaboration between nonprofits and businesses. Nonprofit Volunt Sect Q 29(1):69–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/089976400773746346
Baur D, Palazzo G (2011) The moral legitimacy of NGOs as partners of corporations. Bus Ethics Q 21(4):579–604. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq201121437
Baur D, Schmitz HP (2012) Corporations and NGOs: when accountability leads to co-optation. J Bus Ethics 106(1):9–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1057-9
Beck TE, Lengnick-Hall CA, Lengnick-Hall ML (2008) Solutions out of context: examining the transfer of business concepts to nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Manag Leadersh 19(2):153–171. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.213
Bergman MM, Bergman Z, Teschemacher Y, Arora B, Jyoti D, Sengupta R (2019) Corporate responsibility in India: academic perspectives on the Companies Act 2013. Sustainability 11(21):1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11215939
Boxenbaum E, Jonsson S (2017) Isomorphism, diffusion and decoupling: concept evolution and theoretical challenges. In: Greenwood R, Oliver C, Lawrence TB, Meyer RE (eds) The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism. SAGE Reference, Los Angeles, CA, pp 77–97. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446280669.n4
Bryman A (2012) Social research methods. Oxford University Press, New York, NY
Burchell J, Cook J (2013) Sleeping with the enemy? Strategic transformations in business–NGO relationships through stakeholder dialogue. J Bus Ethics 113(3):505–518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1319-1
Chatterjee B, Mitra N (2017) CSR should contribute to the national agenda in emerging economies—the ‘Chatterjee Model.’ Int J Corp Soc Responsib 2(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-017-0012-1
Claeyé F, Jackson T (2012) The iron cage re-revisited: institutional isomorphism in non-profit organisations in South Africa. J Int Dev 24(5):602–622. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.2852
Dart R (2004) Being “business-like” in a nonprofit organization: a grounded and inductive typology. Nonprofit Volunt Sect Q 33(2):290–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764004263522
Defourny J (2013) Third sector. In: Bruni L, Zamagni S (eds) Handbook on the economics of reciprocity and social enterprise. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 400–410. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849804745.00047
DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am Sociol Assoc 48(2):147–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-08184-3_17
Doane D (2016) The Indian government has shut the door on NGOs, 07 Sept 2016. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/global-development-professionals-network/2016/sep/07/the-indian-government-has-shut-the-door-on-ngos
Ebrahim A (2003) NGOs and organizational change: discourse, reporting, and learning. Cambridge University Press, New York
Filho AS (2010) Growth, poverty and inequality: from Washington consensus to inclusive growth. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/esa/desa/papers/2010/wp100_2010.pdf
Given LM (ed) (2008) Case study. In: The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods, vol 1 & 2. Sage, Los Angeles, pp 68–70
Gupta AD (2014) Implementing corporate social responsibility in India: issues and the beyond. In: Ray S, Raju SS (eds) Implementing corporate social responsibility: Indian perspectives. Springer India, New Delhi, pp 19–30
Kamat S (2004) The privatization of public interest: theorizing NGO discourse in a neoliberal era. Rev Int Polit Econ 11(1):155–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969229042000179794
Kontinen T, Onali A (2017) Strengthening institutional isomorphism in development NGOs? Program mechanisms in an organizational intervention. SAGE Open 7(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016688725
Matten D, Moon J (2008) “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: a conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Acad Manag Rev 33(2):404–424
Muthuri JN, Gilbert V (2011) An institutional analysis of corporate social responsibility in Kenya. J Bus Ethics 98(3):467–483
Powell WW, DiMaggio PJ (1991) The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Ramanath R (2009) Limits to institutional isomorphism: examining internal processes in NGO–government interactions. Nonprofit Volunt Sect Q 38(1):51–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764008315181
Rasche A, Bakker FGAD, Moon J (2013) Complete and partial organizing for corporate social responsibility. J Bus Ethics 115(4):651–663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1824-x
Sarkar J, Sarkar S (2016) Corporate social responsibility in India—an effort to bridge the welfare gap. Rev Mark Integr 7(1):1–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974929215593876
Scott WR (2008) Institutions and organizations: ideas and interests, 3rd edn. Sage, Los Angeles
Suárez DF, Hwang H (2013) Resource constraints or cultural conformity? Nonprofit relationships with businesses. Voluntas 24:581–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-012-9267-z
Sundar P (2017) Giving with a thousand hands: the changing face of Indian philanthropy. Oxford University Press, New Delhi
Williams R (2017) Jindal Stainless Limited’s perspective on corporate social responsibility: a new strategic dimension. In: Mitra N, Schmidpeter R (eds) Corporate social responsibility in India: cases and developments after the legal mandate. CSR, sustainability, ethics & governance. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 117–132
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bihari, A. (2022). The Changing Organisational Practices of Third-Sector Organisations in Mandated CSR in India. In: Talapatra, J., Mitra, N., Schmidpeter, R. (eds) Emerging Economic Models for Sustainable Businesses. Responsible Leadership and Sustainable Management. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7614-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7614-7_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-7613-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-7614-7
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)