Skip to main content

Evaluating Performances of VPN Tunneling Protocols Based on Application Service Requirements

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Trends in Computational and Cognitive Engineering


A Virtual Private Network (VPN) creates a private communication path over the public network to ensure the security of the transmitted data. A plethora of VPN tunneling protocols has been developed for the site-to-site and remote access of the applications. A critical challenge for an organization is to select an appropriate VPN protocol considering the application requirements. In this paper, Internet Protocol Security (IPSec), Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol (L2TP), and Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) protocols have been exploited to determine the application suitability of the VPN tunneling mechanism selected for remote access. End-to-end Throughput, Round Trip Time, and Jitter along heterogeneous hardware environments have been investigated to determine the performance of the VPN tunneling techniques. Experimental results depict that MPLS is suitable for real-time audio-video, web, e-mail, and file-sharing applications. IPSec and L2TP are more applicable to the web, e-mail, and file-sharing applications and not suitable for streaming applications due to high jitter and latency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others


  1. VPN Statistics. Accessed 06 Jun 2021

  2. Agrawal, N., Tapaswi, S.: The performance analysis of honeypot based intrusion detection system for wireless network. Int. J. Wirel. Inf. Netw. 24(1), 14–26 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ahmed, M.Z., AbdallahHashim, A.H., Khalifa, O.O., Salami, M.J.: Border gateway protocol to provide failover in multihoming environment. Int. J. Inf. Technol. 9(1), 33–39 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Aung, S.T., Thein, T.: Comparative analysis of site-to-site layer 2 virtual private networks. In: 2020 IEEE Conference on Computer Applications (ICCA), pp. 1–5. IEEE (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bahnasse, A., Talea, M., Badri, A., Louhab, F.E., Laafar, S.: Smart hybrid SDN approach for MPLS VPN management on digital environment. Telecommun. Syst. 73(2), 155–169 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bensalah, F., El Kamoun, N., Bahnasse, A.: Evaluation of tunnel layer impact on VOIP performances (IP-MPLS-MPLS VPN-MPLS VPN IPSec). Int. J. Comput. Sci. Netw. Secur. (IJCSNS) 17(3), 87 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Forouzan, B.A., Mukhopadhyay, D.: Cryptography and Network Security. Mc Graw Hill Education (India) Private Limited, New York (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jahan, S., Rahman, M.S., Saha, S.: Application specific tunneling protocol selection for virtual private networks. In: 2017 International Conference on Networking, Systems and Security (NSysS), pp. 39–44. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kara, A., Suzuki, T., Takahashi, K., Yoshikawa, M.: A DoS-vulnerability analysis of L2TP-VPN. In: 4th International Conference on Computer and Information Technology, 2004 (CIT’04), pp. 397–402. IEEE (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kotuliak, I., Rybár, P., Trúchly, P.: Performance comparison of IPsec and TLS based VPN technologies. In: 2011 9th International Conference on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications (ICETA), pp. 217–221. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kurose, J.F., Ross, K.W.: Computer Networking: A Top Down Approach, 6th edn. Google Scholar Digital Library (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Osswald, L., Haeberle, M., Menth, M.: Performance comparison of VPN solutions (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pudelko, M., Emmerich, P., Gallenmüller, S., Carle, G.: Performance analysis of VPN gateways. In: 2020 IFIP Networking Conference (Networking), pp. 325–333. IEEE (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zhipeng, Z., Chandel, S., Jingyao, S., Shilin, Y., Yunnan, Y., Jingji, Z.: VPN: a boon or trap?: a comparative study of MPLS, IPSec, and SSL virtual private networks. In: 2018 2nd International Conference on Computing Methodologies and Communication (ICCMC), pp. 510–515. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sohely Jahan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Akter, H., Jahan, S., Saha, S., Faisal, R.H., Islam, S. (2022). Evaluating Performances of VPN Tunneling Protocols Based on Application Service Requirements. In: Kaiser, M.S., Ray, K., Bandyopadhyay, A., Jacob, K., Long, K.S. (eds) Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Trends in Computational and Cognitive Engineering. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 348. Springer, Singapore.

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics