Skip to main content

Potentiality Assessment of Community Open Space for Disaster Management Purpose: A Participatory Approach to Reduce Disaster Vulnerability on a Community

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 501 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 205))

Abstract

Urban open spaces can be defined as one of the most critical component of city design that provides recreational, social, and other facilities to the city dwellers. Besides, these places have a great influence on repairing climate change impact and solving other environmental issues. Nevertheless, the concept of integrating the planning and management strategies of urban open spaces with disaster management strategy development remains unanticipated in the context of urban planning. In this study, the concept of the community participated disaster vulnerability reduction has been applied to identify associated risk, capacity, and potentiality of using open spaces for disaster management purposes. At every step, various types of participatory planning tools were used to identify the best reliable options. In the first step, the community assessed and identified associated risks regarding existing open space and waterbody preservation and use. Community people identified rapid urbanization as the major cause of open space and waterbody reduction. In the second phase, community capacity in terms of institutional organization and community resources was identified. At the final stage, opinion from community people, interview of the key informant, and expert opinion survey helped a lot to identify the potentiality of open spaces and water bodies for disaster management purposes. Community developed strategies and different types of proposals from community peoples and experts have also proposed to identify the ultimate potentiality. Although this study was conducted only for a specific community, the method can be applied to identify all of the aspects of disaster management for other communities as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Agarwal R (2019) Environmental impacts of urban green space. 6:37–40

    Google Scholar 

  2. Allan P, Bryant M (2010, March) The critical role of open space in earthquake recovery: a case study. In EN: Proceedings of the 2010 NZSEE Conference (2010, Nueva Zelandia) pp 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  3. Askari AH (2014) Assessment of Urban public spaces: cases of Kuala Lumpur City Center. University of Malaya, Malaysia

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bhuiyan MSA (2008) Reduction of open space in urban planning: a case of Osmani Odyan

    Google Scholar 

  5. Billie G, Melissa HB, Knuiman M, Collins C, Douglas K, Ng K, Lange A, Donovan RJ (2005) Increasing walking: how important is distance to, attractiveness, and size of public open space?. 28(2-supp-S2):0–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.018

  6. Brown D, Howes M, Hussein K, Longley C, Swindell K (2002) Participatory methodologies and participatory practices: assessing PRA use in the Gambia. Network Paper No. 124, Agricultural Research and Extension Network

    Google Scholar 

  7. Carmona M (2010) Contemporary public space: critique and classification, part one: critique. J Urban Des 15:123–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chiesura A (2004) The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landscape Urban Planning 68(1):129–138

    Google Scholar 

  9. David K, Katarina R (2019) The potential of open space for enhancing urban seismic resilience: a literature review. Sustain Rev

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gill SE, Handley JF, Ennos AR, Pauleit S (2007) Adapting cities for climate change: the role of the green infrastructure. Built Environ 33(1):115–133

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gupta AK, Nair SS (2010) Flood risk and context of land-uses: Chennai city case. J Geogr Reg Plan 3(12):365–372

    Google Scholar 

  12. Huq SMS (2016) Community based disaster management strategy in Bangladesh: present status, future prospects and challenges. Eur J Res Soc Sci 4(2):22–35

    Google Scholar 

  13. Islam K (2013) Community-Based Disaster Management in Bangladesh. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333972153_Community_Based_Disaster_Management_in_Bangladesh

  14. Jayakody PRJC, Amarathunga D, Haigh R (2018) Integration of disaster management strategies with planning and designing public open spaces. Procedia Eng 212:954–961

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kafy AA, Faisal AA, Ferdous L (2018) A participatory assessment to identify the causes and impacts of open space reduction in Rajshahi City Corporation (RCC) Area, Bangladesh. Int J Environ Plann Dev 4(2):16–28

    Google Scholar 

  16. Khan M (2014) Study of open spaces in the context of dhaka city for sustainable use: a syntactic approach. IACSIT Int J Eng Technol 6(3)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kumar R (2017) Overview: social spaces in urban areas. Int Res J Eng Technol 04(04):1032–1039

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mirza F (2015) Disaster mitigation approach of urban green structure concept in coastal settlement dimension. J Architect Built Environ 42(2):51–58

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pariyar RK (2019) Community based disaster risk management: a case study of Mahakali River Basin Kanchanpur. Geogr Base 677–686. https://doi.org/10.3126/tgb.v6i0.26169

  20. Rahman MM, Barua U, Khatun F, Islam I, Rafiq R (2018) Participatory Vulnerability Reduction (PVR): an urban community-based approach for earthquake management. Nat Hazards 93(3):1479–1505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3364-2

  21. Thompson CW (2002) Urban open space in the 21st century. Landsc Urban Plan 60(2):59–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Akter, S., Asma Khatun, M., Dev, T., Hossain, N., Sarker, D. (2022). Potentiality Assessment of Community Open Space for Disaster Management Purpose: A Participatory Approach to Reduce Disaster Vulnerability on a Community. In: Ghosh, C., Kolathayar, S. (eds) A System Engineering Approach to Disaster Resilience. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 205. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7397-9_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7397-9_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-7396-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-7397-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics