Skip to main content

Livelihood Transformations and Sustainability in India

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Livelihood Enhancement Through Agriculture, Tourism and Health

Abstract

India is predominantly a rural country. It is witnessing several transformations in all its major domains. The rural settlements and their livelihoods are also no exception and observing changes in new economic order. The trends suggest that there is declining share of agriculture in the national economy whereas urban population is increasing at a faster rate, which threatens agricultural environs and influence their economic activities significantly. It also adds complications to rural livelihood sustainability. This study is primarily based on the secondary sources of data, collected from various governmental and ministerial publications. It attempts to evaluate transforming status of rural livelihood sustainability in the states of India. UNDP’s normalization method was incorporated to standardize indicators and a modified form of IPCC’s vulnerability index was used to develop “Sustainable Livelihood Index” (SLI). This index is taken as a base for formulating “Livelihood Ladder”, adapted from the Oxfam Report. Main findings of this paper reveal that there are large-scale inter-state disparities for different assets, where central and eastern states of India are found to be poor on livelihood sustainability due to their lower human, social, and financial capital and thus more vulnerable to present-day shocks and stresses while southern and northern states are better placed in terms of livelihood sustainability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Gross enrollment ratio (GER): It is defined as the number of students enrolled in a given level of education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the official school-age population corresponding to the same level of education.

  2. 2.

    Gender Parity Index (GPI) in enrollment at any level of education is the ratio of the number of female students enrolled to the number of male students enrolled at that level.

  3. 3.

    NSSO stands for National Sample Survey Organization, which comes under the Ministry of Statistics, Government of India and conducts socio-economic surveys on various subjects like employment, consumer expenditure, health services, etc.

  4. 4.

    Like the 66th round survey, the 68th round survey employed three different methods of measurement of Monthly Per Capita Expenditure (MPCE) at the household level—the URP (Uniform Reference Period), MRP (Mixed Reference Period), and MMRP (Modified Mixed Reference Period) methods. This paper has used MMRP method for analysis.

  5. 5.

    Tendulkar Methodology for persons above poverty line (APL) refers to that methodology which identifies persons whose level of income is sufficient to meet their minimum living conditions.

  6. 6.

    It is an economic benchmark used by the Indian government to indicate economically disadvantaged people who need government’s assistance and aid.

  7. 7.

    Marginal workers are those workers who get work for less than 183 days in a year.

  8. 8.

    Water Premises: Premises has been defined as a building along with the land and/or common places attached to it. It is used in context of availability of drinking water source, depending upon the distance at which it is available. (i) Within the Premises: where the household live. (ii) Near the Premises: If the source is located within a range of within a distance of 500 m in the case of rural areas. (iii) Away from the Premises: If the drinking water source is located beyond 500 m in rural areas.

References

  • Ashley C, Carney D (1999) Sustainable livelihoods: lessons from early experience. DFID, London, pp 4–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Banu N, Fazal S (2017) A pragmatic assessment of livelihood status in the peri-urban interface: a case from developing India. Asian Geogr 9–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Barah BC (2007) Strategies for agricultural development in the North-East India: challenges and emerging opportunities. Indian J Agric Econ 62:18–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Bebbington A (1999) Capitals and capabilities: a framework for analyzing peasant viability, rural livelihoods and poverty. World Dev 27(12):2012–2044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhagat RB (2014) Rural and urban sanitation in India. Kurukshetra 11–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Census of India (2011) Houses, household amenities and assets. Office of the Registrar General of India, Government of India, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamber R, Conway G (1992) Sustainable rural livelihoods: practical concepts for the 21st century. Discussion Paper 296, Institute for Development Studies, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  • Dev SM, Venkatanarayana M (2011) Youth employment and unemployment in India. Working Paper, Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research (IGIDR), Mumbai, pp 12–21

    Google Scholar 

  • DFID (Department for International Development) (1999) Sustainable livelihoods guidance sheets. Department for International Development, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis F (2000) Rural livelihoods and diversity in developing countries. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis F, Biggs S (2001) Evolving themes in rural development 1950s–2000s. Dev Policy Rev 19(4):437–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (Food and Agricultural Organization) (2012) The state of food insecurity in the world 2012. United Nations-FAO, IFAD and WFP, Rome. http://www.fao.org/news/story/en/item/161819/icode/. Accessed 5 Jun 2019

  • Fazal S (2000) Urban expansion and loss of agricultural land: a gis based study of Saharanpur city, India. Environ Urbanization 13:133–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gautam Y, Andersen P (2016) Rural livelihood diversification and household well-being: insights from Humla, Nepal. J Rural Stud 44:239–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GOI (Government of India) (2010) Right to education. Department of School Education and Literacy, MHRD, GOI. http://mhrd.gov.in/rte. Accessed 6 Jun 2019

  • GOI (Government of India) (2011) Annual report of ministry of labour and employment. https://labour.gov.in/annual-reports. Accessed 15 Jun 2019

  • GOI (Government of India) (2010–11) Department of agriculture cooperation and family welfare. http://agricoop.nic.in/publication/agriculture-census. Accessed 10 Jun 2019

  • GOI (Government of India) (2013) National Food Security Act-2013. Department of Food & Public Distribution, Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food & Public Distribution. Government of India. GOI. http://dfpd.nic.in/nfsa-act.htm. Accessed 6 Jun 2019

  • GOI (Government of India) (2016) Ministry of drinking water & sanitation. http://www.mdws.gov.in/

  • Gupta N (2016) Decline of cultivators and growth of agricultural labourers in India from 2001 to 2011. Int J Rural Manag 12:185–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta V, Singh B, Ranjan R (2008) An economic evaluation of Kisan credit card in Bhabua district of Bihar, India. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci 7(02):5–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Haan L (2012) The livelihood approach: a critical exploration. Erdkunde 66(4):345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn MB, Riederer AM, Foster SO (2009) The livelihood vulnerability index: a pragmatic approach to assessing risks from climate variability and change—a case study in Mozambique. Glob Environ Change 19(1):74–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IFPRI (International Food Policy Research Institute) http://www.ifpri.org/. Accessed 6 Jun 2019

  • IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2001) Climate Change 2001: impacts, adaptations and vulnerability. In: Contribution of working groups II to the third assessment report. Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • ISFR (Indian State of Forest Report) (2011) http://fsi.nic.in/forest-report-2011. Accessed 12 Jun 2019

  • James KS (2011) India’s demographic change: opportunities and challenges. Science 333:576–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James KS, Goli S (2017) Demographic changes in India: is the country prepared for the challenge? Brown J World Aff 23:168–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Jha BM, Sinha SK (2009) Towards better management of ground water resources in India. Q J Central Ground Water Board 24(1–4) (Ministry of Water Resources, Government of India)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Das KC (2014) Drinking water and sanitation facilities in India and its linkages with diarrhoea among children under five: evidence from recent data. Int J Humanit Soc Sci 3(4):52–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran M, Wright A, Renehan P, Szava A, Beard N, Rich E (2007) The transformation of assets for sustainable livelihoods in a remote aboriginal settlement. Desert Knowledge CRC, Report 28, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • NSSO (National Sample Survey Office) (2014) Household consumption of various goods and services in India, 20ll–12. Report No. 558. NSS 68th Round. National Sample Survey Office. Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation. Government of India

    Google Scholar 

  • OXFAM (2006) The sustainable livelihoods approach. Oxfam International Report, Wales

    Google Scholar 

  • Patidar H (2018) Livelihood security in rural India: reflections from some selected indicators. Forum Dev Stud 148–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Patnaik S, Prasad SC (2014) Revisiting sustainable livelihoods: insights from implementation studies in rural India. Vision 18(4):353–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen EK, Pedersen ML (2010) The sustainable livelihoods approach from a psychological perspective: approaches to development. University of Aarhus, Denmark, Institute of Biology, pp 6–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Planning Commission (2014) Report of the expert group to review the methodology for measurement of poverty. Government of India, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramchandran VK, Swaminathan M (2003) Agrarian studies: essays on Agrarian relations in less-developed countries

    Google Scholar 

  • Sajjad H, Nasreen I (2016) Assessing farm-level agricultural sustainability using site-specific indicators and sustainable livelihood security index: evidence from Vaishali district, India. Community Dev 47(5):602–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scoones I (1998) Sustainable rural livelihoods: a framework for analysis. IDS Working Paper, 72, Brighton, Sussex, pp 5–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Scoones I (2009) Livelihoods perspectives and rural development. J Peasant Stud 172–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A (2003) Development as capability expansion. Reading in human development. Oxford University Press, New Delhi and New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh PK, Hiremath BN (2010) Sustainable livelihood security index in a developing country: a tool for developing planning. Ecol Indic 10(2):440–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solesbury W (2003) Sustainable livelihoods: a case study of the evolution of DFID policy. Working Paper 217, Overseas Development Institute, pp 2–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Talreja C (2014) India’s demographic change: realities and opportunities. Indian J Labour Econ 57(1):141–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Thakur F, Mehta S (2000) Analysis of education sector-study of Kerala and Jammu and Kashmir. J Humanit Soc Sci 23:46–48

    Google Scholar 

  • UN (United Nations) (2018) Global issues. https://www.un.org/en/sections/issues-depth/global-issues-overview/. Accessed 7 Jun 2019

  • UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) (2015) Human development reports 2015: work for human development. http://hdr.undp.org/en/

  • United Nations (2000) United Nations Millennium Declaration, New York, Millennium Summit of the United Nations, 6–8 September 2000

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO and UNICEF (2013) Progress on sanitation and drinking water: 2013 update. WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply and Sanitation

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank Report (2016) India’s poverty profile. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/infographic/2016/05/27/india-s-poverty-profile. Accessed 9 Jun 2019

  • World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Report of the world commission on environment and development: our common future. Bruntland Report, United Nations, pp 330–332. http://www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf

  • World Economic Forum (2018) Global gender gap report. http://reports.weforum.org/global-gender-gap-report-2018/. Accessed 8 Jun 2019

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fazal, S., Vashishtha, D., Sultana, S. (2022). Livelihood Transformations and Sustainability in India. In: Jana, N.C., Singh, A., Singh, R.B. (eds) Livelihood Enhancement Through Agriculture, Tourism and Health. Advances in Geographical and Environmental Sciences. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7310-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics