Skip to main content

Development of an Ontology for Defect Classification in Remanufacturing

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Recent Advances in Intelligent Manufacturing and Service Systems

Abstract

Remanufacturing within the automotive industry has become an important part of environmental and reusability efforts. A crucial aspect of the remanufacturing process workflow is the correct identification and classification of defects on the product. A comprehensive ontology was developed based on a literature review to define, distinguish, and prioritize various defects for the remanufacturing of cylinder heads to show the relationships between them. Furthermore, the opinions of experts who work with or within the remanufacturing industry were surveyed. Text-mining methods and input from standards documents where applicable were used to confirm and extend the ontology for defect classification in remanufacturing. Results from these efforts show that these methods can provide sufficient supplemental knowledge to validate critical or underdeveloped areas of ontology. Expert opinions are extremely valuable in communicating information that is not discussed in scholarly articles and in contributing to the process of validating information found in scholarly articles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lam A, Sherwood M, Shu L (2001) FMEA-Based design for remanufacture using automotive-remanufacturer data. SAE Technical Paper 2001-01-0308. https://doi.org/10.4271/2001-01-0308

  2. Lin HK, Harding JA, Shahbaz M (2004) Manufacturing system engineering ontology for semantic interoperability across extended project teams. Int J Prod Res 42(24):5099–5118

    Google Scholar 

  3. CarleyL (2012) Cylinder head repair methods. Engine Builder Magazine. www.enginebuildermag.com/2012/01/cylinder-head-repair-methods/. Accessed 5 Jan

  4. Kluska-Nawarecka S, Nawarecki E, Dobrowolski G, Haratym A, Regulski K (2013) The platform for semantic integration and sharing technological knowledge on metal processing and casting. Comput Methods Mater Sci 13(2):304–312

    Google Scholar 

  5. Regulski K, Rojek G, Kusiak J (2014) Process of ontology construction of rolling metal sheets industrial process. In Key Eng Mater 622–623:978–985. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.622-623.978

  6. Huang C, Cai H, Xu L, Xu B, Gu Y, Jiang L (2019) Data-driven ontology generation and evolution towards intelligent service in manufacturing systems. Futur Gener Comput Syst 101:197–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Investment Casting Institute. Atlas of Casting Defects. Retrieved September 23, 2020, from http://61746c6173.investmentcasting.org/casting/defects/

    Google Scholar 

  8. Protégé 4.3 (2021) Stanford University. https://protege.stanford.edu/products.php

  9. Bessant J, Caffyn S, Gilbert J, Harding R, Webb S (1994) Rediscovering continuous improvement. Tecnovation 14(1):17–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gómez-Pérez A (2004) Ontology evaluation. In: Staab S, Studer R (eds) Handbook on ontologies. International handbooks on information systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gupta V, Lehal GS (2009) A survey of text mining techniques and applications. J Emerg Technol Web Intell 1(1):60–76

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chu C, Park K, Kremer GE (2020) A global supply chain risk management framework: an application of text-mining to identify region-specific supply chain risks. Adv Eng Inform 45:101053

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rajpathak DG (2013) An ontology based text mining system for knowledge discovery from the diagnosis data in the automotive domain. Comput Ind 64(5):565–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kitchenham BA, Pfleeger SL (2002) Principles of survey research part 2: designing a survey. ACM SIGSOFT Softw Eng Notes 27(1):18–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Vertin KD, Haller CL, Lubnow Jr TS (1995) A root cause investigation of cylinder head cracking in large diesel engine standby power generators. SAE Trans 104(3):937–948

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the experts from companies that employ remanufacturing processes (John Deere, Danfoss, and Midwest Cylinder) and Dr. David Sly for their valuable feedback. The Project was supported by DOE REMADE award 19-01-Rapid Damage Identification to Reduce Remanufacturing Costs.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lechtenberg, T., Gunay, E., Chu, CY., Kremer, G., Kremer, P., Jackman, J. (2022). Development of an Ontology for Defect Classification in Remanufacturing. In: Sen, Z., Oztemel, E., Erden, C. (eds) Recent Advances in Intelligent Manufacturing and Service Systems. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7164-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7164-7_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-7163-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-7164-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics