Abstract
In this chapter, we explore how the scenarios constructed in Chap. 8 help us think about Antarctic geopolitics, conceived as the intersection between power, authority, and space, in rivalry between states. We suggest that viewing Antarctic geopolitics through this lens can assist in closing some important conceptual gaps in international law and institutionalist perspectives on Antarctic governance. We examine the intersections between spatial ordering, authority, and power in the subtle rivalry between states in Antarctica and the Southern Ocean. Our scenarios illustrate how projection of power may influence the future of the ATS—both globally, from great power competition, and regionally, from simmering rivalries in the Indo-Pacific and South Atlantic. We suggest that the concept of balance of power might usefully be viewed not simply as an adversarial relationship, but also in associational terms, with its potential for founding a just equilibrium between states. In turn, this just equilibrium can enliven the authority of enabling institutions (such as the ATS) and international law. We also highlight how spatial ordering of areas in, below and above Antarctica is subject to significant tensions due to ambiguities in interaction between the Law of the Sea Convention, the Antarctic Treaty, and treaties governing outer space.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This approach often draws on the ‘structural realism’ of Kenneth Waltz, which is based on rational choice analysis (Waltz 2010).
References
Bachrach, Peter, and Morton Baratz. 1962. Two Faces of Power. American Political Science Review 56 (4): 947–952.
Bowring, Bill. 2008. The Degradation of the International Legal Order? The Rehabilitation of Law and the Possibility of Politics. London: Routledge-Cavendish.
Brunée, Jutta, and Stephen J. Toope. 2010. Legitimacy and Legality in International Law: An Interactional Account. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bull, Hedley. 1977. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
Bull, Hedley. 2012. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, 4th ed. London: Red Globe Press.
Cassese, Antonio. 2005. International Law, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Clausewitz, Carl von. 1918. On War (trans. Graham, J. J.) London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co. https://oll.libertyfund.org/page/clausewitz-war-as-politics-by-other-means. Accessed 19 August 2021.
COMNAP. 2017. Antarctic Station Catalogue. Christchurch: Council of Managers of National Antarctic Programs. https://www.comnap.aq/publications/. Accessed 19 August 2021.
Dahl, Robert A. 1961. Who Governs: Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Dastidar, Prabir G. 2007. National and Institutional Productivity and Collaboration in Antarctic Science: An Analysis of 25 Years of Journal Publications (1980–2004). Polar Research 26 (2): 175–180.
Dudeney, John R., and David W. H. Walton. 2012. Leadership in Politics and Science within the Antarctic Treaty. Polar Research 31 (1): 11075.
Fish, Tim. 2021. New Zealand releases Southern Ocean patrol ship RFI. Janes. Defence News, 17 May. Surrey, UK: Jane’s Group UK Limited. www.janes.com/defence-news/news-detail/new-zealand-releases-southern-ocean-patrol-ship-rfi. Accessed 4 June 2021.
Foucault, Michel. 2002. Power. Ed. James D. Faubion, London: Penguin.
Franck, Thomas M. 1990. The Power of Legitimacy Among Nations. New York: Oxford University Press.
Goldsmith, Jack L., and Eric A. Posner. 2005. The Limits of International Law Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hart, H.L.A. 1961. The Concept of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Haward, Marcus, and Tom Griffiths, eds. 2011. Australia and the Antarctic Treaty System: Fifty Years of Influence. Sydney: UNSW Press.
Hird, Ian. 2007. After Anarchy: Legitimacy and Power in the United Nations Security Council. Princeton and London: Princeton University Press.
Joyner, Christopher C. 1989. Non Militarization of the Antarctica: The Interplay of Law and Geopolitics. Naval War College Review 42 (4): 83–104.
Kelly, Phil. 2019. Rescuing Classical Geopolitics: Separating Geopolitics from Realism. Geopolitics, History and International Relations 11 (1): 41–58.
Kennedy, David. 1987. International Legal Structures. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.
Koskenniemi, Martti. 2005. From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Little, Richard. 1989. Deconstructing the Balance of Power: Two Traditions of Thought. Review of International Studies 15 (2): 87–100.
Sanz Fernández de Córdoba, S. 2004. 100km Altitude Boundary for Astronautics. FAI Astronautic Records Commission (ICARE). Lausanne: Fédération Aéronautique Internationale. https://www.fai.org/page/icare-boundary. Accessed 19 August 2021.
Lukes, Steven. 2005. Power: A Radical View, 2nd ed. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mackinder, Halford J. 1904. The Geographical Pivot of History. The Geographical Journal 23 (4): 421–437.
Marks, Susan. 2008. Introduction. In International Law from the Left: Re-examining Marxist Legacies, ed. Susan Marks, 1–29. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McGee, Jeffrey, Brendan Gogarty, and Danielle Smith. 2017. Associational Balance of Power and the Possibilities for International Law in the South China Sea. Asia-Pacific Journal of Ocean Law and Policy 2 (1): 88–116.
Mearsheimer, John J. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W. W. Norton.
Mearsheimer, John J., and Stephen M. Walt. 2016. The Case for Offshore Balancing. Foreign Affairs 95 (4): 70–83.
Mills, C. Wright. 1970. The Power Elite. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Morgenthau, Hans. 1967. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, 4th ed. New York: Knopf.
Nelson, Timothy G. 2019. Where Does Space Begin? The Decades-Long Legal Mission to Find the Border Between Air and Space. SpaceNews, 26 March. Boulder, CO: Pocket Ventures LLC. https://spacenews.com/op-ed-where-does-space-begin-the-decades-long-legal-mission-to-find-the-border-between-air-and-space/. Accessed 19 August 2021.
Oppenheim, Lassa. 1905. International Law: A Treatise, vol. 1. London: Longmans Green.
Parsons, Anthony, ed. 1987. Antarctica: The Next Decade. Report of a Group Study Chaired by Sir Anthony Parsons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pettit, Philip. 2019. Social Norms and the Internal Point of View: An Elaboration of Hart’s Genealogy of Law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 39 (2): 229–258.
Quilty, Patrick G. 1990. Antarctica as Continent for Science. In Antarctica’s Future: Continuity or Change? eds. Richard A. Herr, H. Robert Hall and Marcus G. Haward, 29–37. Hobart: Tasmanian Government Printer.
Sanz Fernández de Córdoba, S. 2004. 100km Altitude Boundary for Astronautics. FAI Astronautic Records Commission (ICARE). Lausanne: Fédération Aéronautique Internationale. https://www.fai.org/page/icare-boundary. Accessed 19 August 2021.
Schmitt, Carl. 2006. The Nomos of the Earth in the International Law of Jus Publicum Europaeum (trans. Ulmen, G. L.). New York: Telos Press Publishing.
Sloan, Geoffrey. 2017. Geopolitics, Geography and Strategic History. London: Routledge.
Starr, Harvey. 2013. On Geopolitics: Spaces and Places. International Studies Quarterly 57 (3): 433–439.
Till, Geoffrey. 2018. Seapower: A Guide to the Twenty-First Century, 4th ed. London: Routledge.
Waltz, Kenneth N. 2010. Theory of International Politics. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
Young, Oran R. 2010. Institutional Dynamics: Emergent Patterns in International Environmental Governance. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McGee, J., Edmiston, D., Haward, M. (2022). Scenario Analysis and the Classical View of Antarctic Geopolitics. In: The Future of Antarctica. Springer Polar Sciences. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7095-4_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7095-4_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-7094-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-7095-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)