Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Material Culture Studies: Objectification, Agency, and Intangibility

Materiality

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of the Anthropology of Technology

  • 2956 Accesses

Abstract

Material culture studies have in recent decades taken a more central role in anthropological thinking, but not just in terms of an interest in exploring individual objects, material qualities, patterns, or symbols of things. The goal is also to understand how human lives fundamentally unfold through material culture. This chapter explores technology through the broad variety of approaches captured under the heading ‘material culture studies’, to see how things are entangled in the values, meanings, and practices of human lives. It briefly outlines discussions about objectification, agency, and materiality to highlight how even the most mundane aspects of human life, such as light, have central bearing on human worlds. Lighting and lighting are, on the one hand, intangible but, on the other, have a profound effect on how the world appears. As a technology, lighting has shaped human societies by extending the day and carrying strong symbolic values, but also through embracing other objects in its material qualities. Humans adjust and manipulate such qualities to present spaces in particular ways that make sense in local contexts. To understand technologies one also needs to understand how their material qualities constitute the self and society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Appadurai, A. (1986). The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arregui, A. (2015). Amazonian quilombolas and the technopolitics of aluminum. Journal of Material Culture, 20(3), 249–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, K., & Bridge, G. (2006). Material worlds? Resource geographies and the ‘matter of nature’. Progress in Human Geography, 30(1), 5–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bille, M. (2010). Seeking Providence Through Things. The Words of God versus Black Cumin. In M. Bille, F. Hastrup & T. F. Sørensen (Eds.), An Anthropology of Absence. Materializations of Transcendence and Loss (pp. 167–184). New York: Springer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bille, M. (2017). Ecstatic things : The power of light in shaping Bedouin homes. Home Cultures, 14(1), 25–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bille, M. (2019). Homely atmospheres and lighting technologies in Denmark. Living with Light. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bille, M., Bjerregaard, P., & Sørensen, T. F. F. (2015). Staging Atmospheres. Materiality, Culture and the texture of the in-between. Emotion, Space & Society, 15, 31–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bille, M., Hastrup, F., & Sørensen, T. F. (2010). Introduction: An Anthropology of Absence. In M. Bille, F. Hastrup & T. F. Sørensen (Eds.), An Anthropology of Absence: Materializations of Transcendence and Loss (pp. 3–22). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bille, M., & Sørensen, T. F. (2007). An Anthropology of Luminosity. The agency of light. Journal of Material Culture, 12(3), 263–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Böhme, G. (1993). Atmosphere as the Fundamental Concept of a New Aesthetics. Thesis Eleven, 36, 113–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Böhme, G. (1998). Atmosphere as an aesthetic concept. Daidalos, 68, 112–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1970). The Berber house or the world reversed. Social Science Information, 9(2), 151–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandi, U., & Geissmar-Brandi, C. (2006). Light for Cities : Lighting Design for Urban Spaces. A Handbook. Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchli, V. (2002a). Introduction. In V. Buchli (Ed.), The Material Culture Reader (pp. 1–22). Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchli, V. (2002b). The Material Culture Reader. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchli, V. (2016). An archaeology of the immaterial. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchli, V. (2021). Extra-terrestrial methods: toward an ethnography of the ISS. In T. Carroll, A. Walford & S. Walton (Eds.), Lineages and Advancements in Material Culture Studies Perspectives from UCL Anthropology. London & New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Candlin, F., & Guins, R. (Eds.) (2009). The Object Reader. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, T, Jeevendrampillai, D., & Parkhurst, A. (2017). Introduction. In T. Carroll, D. Jeevendrampillai, A. Parkhurst & J. Shackelford (Eds.), The material culture of failure (pp. 1–20). London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, A. (1998). Window shopping at home: classifieds, catalogues and new consumer skills. In D. Miller (Ed.), Material Cultures: Why some things matter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corsín Jiménez, A., & Nahum-Claudel, C. (2019). The anthropology of traps: Concrete technologies and theoretical interfaces. Journal of Material Culture, 24(4), 383–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coupaye, L. (2021). ‘Things ain’t the same anymore’ Towards an anthropology of technical objects (or ‘When Leroi- Gourhan and Simondon meet MCS’). In T. Carroll, A. Walford & S. Walton (Eds.), Lineages and Advancements in Material Culture Studies. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crabtree, A., Mercer, G., Horan, R., Grant, S., Tan, T., & Buxton, J. A. (2013). A qualitative study of the perceived effects of blue lights in washrooms on people who use injection drugs. Harm Reduction Journal, 10(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, J. (2019). No Current: Electricity and Disconnection in Rural India. In S. Abram, B. R. Winthereik & T. Yarrow (Eds.), Electrifying anthropology. Exploring electrical practices and infrastructures (pp. 65–82). London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, I. (2015). Feeling at home in contemporary Japan: Space, atmosphere and intimacy. Emotion, Space and Society, 15, 47–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, J. (2018). Warfarin as a materially and digitally informed drug. Journal of Material Culture, 23(3), 312–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M., & Isherwood, B. C. (1979). The world of goods: towards an anthropology of consumption. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drazin, A. (2021). The object biography. In T. Carroll, A. Walford & Shireen Walton (Eds.), Lineages and Advancements in Material Culture Studies (pp. 61–74). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebbensgaard, C. L. (2019a). Making sense of diodes and sodium: Vision, visuality and the everyday experience of infrastructural change. Geoforum, 103, 95–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebbensgaard, C. L. (2019b). Standardised difference: Challenging uniform lighting through standards and regulation. Urban Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edensor, T. (2015). Light design and atmosphere. Visual Communication, 14(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Edensor, T. (2017). From Light to Dark: Daylight, Illumination and Gloom. Minneapolis & London: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edensor, T., & Bille, M. (2017). ‘Always like never before’: Learning from the lumitopia of Tivoli Gardens. Social & Cultural Geography.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eglash, R. (1999). African fractals: Modern computing and indigenous design. Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eglash, R. (2006). Technology as material culture. In C. Tilley, W. Keane, S. Küchler, M. Rowlands & P. Spyer (Eds.), Handbook of Material Culture. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelke, M. (2005). Sticky Subjects and sticky objects. The substance of African Christian Healing. In D. Miller (Ed.), Materiality (pp. 118–139). Durham & London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, J., & Slater, D. (2019). Making space for ‘the social’: connecting sociology and professional practices in urban lighting design 1. British Journal of Sociology, 0(0), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnert, J. (1994). Seize the Day. Ethnological perspectives on light and darkness. Ethnologia Scandinavica, 24, 38–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geismar, H. (2004). The Materiality of Contemporary Art in Vanuatu. Journal of Material Culture, 9, 43–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geismar, H. (2018). Museum Object Lessons for the Digital Age. London: UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geismar, H. (2021). A new instrumentalism? In T. Carroll, A. Walford & S. Walton (Eds.), Lineages and Advancements in Material Culture Studies (pp. 75–88). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gell, A. (1992). The technology of enchantment and the enchantment of technology. In J. Coote & A. Shelton (Eds.), Anthropology, Art and Aesthetics (pp. 40–63). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gell, A. (1998). Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genus, A., & Jensen, C. (2017). Beyond ‘behaviour’: The institutionalisation of practice and the case of energy-efficient lighting in Denmark. Journal of Consumer Culture, 19(3), 340-358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerhardsson, K. M., Laike, T., & Johansson, M. (2020). Leaving lights on – A conscious choice or wasted light? Use of indoor lighting in Swedish homes. Indoor and Built Environment, 0(0).

    Google Scholar 

  • Glassie, H. H. (1975). Folk Housing in Middle Virginia: A Structural Analysis of Historic Artifacts. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govoroff, N. C. (1993). The hunter and his gun in Haute-Provence. In P. Lemonnier (Ed.), Technological choices: transformation in material cultures since the Neolithic. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, L. (2020). ROCK | WATER | LIFE. Durham & London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harkness, R. (2011). Earthships: The Homes That Trash Built. Anthropology Now, 3(1), 54–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, G. (Ed.) (2009). Prince of Networks Bruno Latour and Metaphysics. Melbourne: repress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, R. (2019). NEW MATERIALITIES AND THE ENACTMENT On Heritage Ontologies: Rethinking the Material Worlds of Heritage, 91(4), 1365–1384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauge, B. (2015). Lives under the sun: The sensory qualities of daylight in designing the everyday. Senses and Society, 10(1), 71–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henare, A, Holbraad, M., & Wastell, S. (2007). Thinking Through Things. Theorising artefacts ethnographically. London & New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, D. (2010). The Material-Cultural Turn: event and effect. In D. Hicks & M. C. Beaudry (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Material Culture Studies (pp. 25–98). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, D., & Beaudry, M. C. (Eds.) (2010). Oxford Handbook of Material Culture Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, J. (2007). The Story of the Amulet: Locating the Enchantment of Collections. Journal of Material Culture, 12, 65–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. (1982). Symbols in Action: Ethnoarchaeological studies of material culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. (1989). The Meanings of Things: Material Culture and Symbolic Expression. London: Unwin Hyman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holbraad, M. (2007). The Power of Powder: multiplicity and motion in the divinatory cosmology of Cuban Ifa (or mana, again). In A. Henare, M. Holbraad & S. Wastell (Eds.), Thinking Through Things. Theorising artefacts ethnographically (pp. 189–225). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holbraad, M., & Pedersen, M. A. (2016). The Ontological Turn: An Anthropological Exposition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtorf, C. (2002). Notes on the life history of a pot sherd. Journal of Material Culture, 7, 49–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horst, H. A., & Miller, D. (2006). Cell phone: an anthropology of communication. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horst, H. A., & Miller, D. (2012). Digital Anthropology. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hui, L. H. (2020). A light burden: cultural discourse of light in Japan. Asian Education and Development Studies, ahead-of-p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (2000). Stop, look and listen! Vision, hearing and human movement. In T. Ingold (Ed.), The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill (pp. 243–287). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (2007). Materials against materiality. Archaeological Dialogues, 14(1), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (2011). Being alive. Essays on movement, knowledge and description. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (2012). The atmosphere. Chiasmi International, 14, 75–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keane, W. (2005). Signs are not the garb of meaning: On the social analysis of material things. In D. Miller (Ed.), Materiality (pp. 182–205). London: Duke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knappett, C. (2004). The Affordances of Things: a Post-Gibsonian Perspective on the Relationality of Mind and Matter. In E. Demarrais, C. Gosden & C. Renfrew (Eds.), Rethinking Materiality: The Engagement of Mind with the Material World (pp. 43–51). Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knappett, C., & Malafouris, L. (2008). Material Agency. New York: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Knox, H. (2021). Digital Devices: Knowing Material Culture. In T. Carroll, A. Walford & S. Walton (Eds.), Lineages and Advancements in Material Culture Studies Perspectives from UCL Anthropology. London & New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knox, H., & Nafus, D. (Eds.) (2018). Ethnography for a data-saturated world. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopytoff, I. (1986). The Cultural biography of things: commoditization as process. In A. Appadurai (Ed.), The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective (pp. 64–91). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Küchler, S. (1987). Malangan: Art and Memory in a Melanesian Society. Man, New Series, 22(2), 238–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Küchler, S. (2008). Technological Materiality: Beyond the Dualist Paradigm. Theory, Culture & Society, 25(1), 101–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, A. (2015). Cultures of lights. Geoforum, 65, 59–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larkin, B. (2013). The Politics and Poetics of Infrastructure. Annual Review of Anthropology, 42, 327–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J., & Singleton, V. (2005). Object lessons. Organization, 12(3), 331–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemonnier, P., & Pfaffenberger, B. (1989). Towards an Anthropology of Technology. Man, 24, 526–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindstrøm, T. C. (2015). Agency ‘in itself’. A discussion of inanimate, animal and human agency. Archaeological Dialogues, 22(2), 207–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lofgren, O. (1997). Scenes From a Troubled Marriage: Swedish Ethnology and Material Culture Studies. Journal of Material Culture, 2, 95–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, K. M. (2020). Vital decomposition. Soil practitioners and life politics. Durham & London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, S. (2006). Words in Stone?: Agency and Identity in a Nazi Landscape. Journal of Material Culture, 11, 105–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormack, D. P. (2018). Atmospheric Things. London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier, J., Hasenöhrl, U., Krause, K., & Pottharst, M. (Eds.) (2014). Urban lighting, light pollution and society. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, B. (2008). Materializing Religion. Material Religion: The Journal of Objects, Art and Belief, 4, 227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (1985). Artefacts as categories: a study of ceramic variability in Central India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (1987). Material Culture and Mass Consumption. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (1993). Unwrapping Christmas. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (1997). Why some things matter. In D. Miller (Ed.), Why some things matter (pp. 3–21). London: UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (2001a). Car cultures. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (Ed.) (2001b). Home Possessions. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (2004). Making love in supermarkets. In A. Amin & N. Thrift (Eds.), The Blackwell Cultural Economy Reader. New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (2005). Materiality: An Introduction. In D. Miller (Ed.), Materiality (pp. 1–50). Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (2008). Comfort of things. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (2010). Stuff. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (2011). Tales from Facebook. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., & Slater, D. (2000). The Internet: an ethnographic approach. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., & Tilley, C. (1996). Editorial. Journal of Material Culture, 1(1), 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mol, A. (2002). The Body Multiple. Ontology in medical practice. Durham & London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. (1998). Visual piety: a history and theory of popular religious images. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munn, N. (1983). The fame of GAwa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navaro-Yashin, Y. (2012). The Make-Believe Space. Affective geography in a post war polity. Durham & London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, D. (2018). American Illuminations. Urban Lighting, 1800–1920. Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papadopoulos, C., & Moyes, H. (Eds.) (2022). Oxford Handbook of Light in Archaeology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrova, S. (2018). Illuminating austerity: Lighting poverty as an agent and signifier of the Greek crisis. European Urban and Regional Studies, 25(4), 360–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfaffenberger, B. (1988). Fetishised Objects and Humanised Nature: Towards an Anthropology of Technology. Man, 23(2), 236–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pink, S., Mackley, K. L., & Morosanu, R. (2015). Researching in atmospheres: video and the ‘feel’ of the mundane. Visual Communication, 14(3), 351–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pink, S., & Sumartojo, S. (2018). The lit world: living with everyday urban automation. Social and Cultural Geography, 19(7).

    Google Scholar 

  • Preucel, R. (2006). Archaeological Semiotics. New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, A. (2007). ‘Smuk is king’: the action of cigarettes in a Papua New Guinea Prison. In A. Henare, M. Holbraad & S. Wastell (Eds.), Thinking through Things. Theorising artefacts ethnographically. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rheinberger, H-J. (1997). Toward a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro, A. (2016). Against object agency. A counterreaction to Sørensen’s ‘Hammers and nails’. Archaeological Dialogues, 23(02), 229–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, T. (2010). ‘The hallmark of a doctor’: The stethoscope and the making of medical identity. Journal of Material Culture, 15(3), 287–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schepelern Johansen, B., & Schepelern Johansen, K. (2014). Heroin: From Drug to Ambivalent Medicine. Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, 39(1), 75–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schivelbusch, W. (1988). Disenchanted Night: The Industrialization of Light in the Nineteenth Century. Berkeley: The University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroer, S. A., & Schmitt, S. B. (Eds.) (2018). Exploring Atmospheres Ethnographically. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulte-Römer, N. (2019). Research in the Dark. Nature and Culture, 14(2), 215–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seaver, N. (2019). Captivating algorithms: Recommender systems as traps. Journal of Material Culture, 24(4), 421–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanks, M., & Tilley, C. (1987). Social Theory and Archaeology. Oxford: Polity Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, R. (2014). Streetlighting in England and Wales: New technologies and uncertainty in the assemblage of streetlighting infrastructure. Environment and Planning A, 46(9).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, R. (2018). The Nocturnal City. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shove, E., Walker, G., & Brown, S. (2014). Material culture, room temperature and the social organisation of thermal energy. Journal of Material Culture, 19(2), 113–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skuse, A. (2005). Enlivened objects: The social life, death and rebirth of radio as commodity in Afghanistan. Journal of Material Culture, 10(2), 123–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneath, D. (2009). Reading the signs by Lenin’s light: Development, divination and metonymic fields in Mongolia. Ethnos, 74(1), 72–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, T. F. (2016). Hammers and nails. A response to Lindstrøm and to Olsen and Witmore. Archaeological Dialogues, 23(01), 115–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stallybrass, P. (1998). Marx’s Coat. In P. Spyer (Ed.), Border Fetishisms: Material Objects in Unstable Spaces (pp. 183–207). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strang, V. (2005). Common Senses: Water, Sensory Experience and the Generation of Meaning. Journal of Material Culture, 10, 92–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumartojo, S., & Pink, S. (2018). Moving Through the Lit World: The Emergent Experience of Urban Paths. Space and Culture, 21(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumartojo, S., & Pink, S. (2019). Atmospheres and the Experiential World. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilley, C. (1994). A Phenomenology of Landscape: Places, Paths and Monuments. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilley, C. (2004). The Materiality of Stone: Explorations in Landscape Phenomenology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilley, C. (2007). Materiality in materials. Archaeological Dialogues, 14(1), 16–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilley, C., Keane, W., Küchler, S., Rowlands, M., & Spyer, P. (2006). Handbook of Material Culture. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vannini, P. (2009). Introduction. In P. Vannini (Ed.), Material Culture and technology in everyday life (pp. 1–14). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vannini, P., & Taggart, J. (2013). Domestic lighting and the off-grid quest for visual comfort. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 31(6), 1076–1090.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walford, A. (2021). Data aesthetics. In T. Carroll, A. Walford & S. Walton (Eds.), Lineages and Advancements in Material Culture Studies Perspectives from UCL Anthropology. New York & London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, C. (2008). The mosquito: A repellent response. Youth Justice, 8(2), 122–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winther, T. (2008). The impact of electricity: development, desires and dilemmas. New York & Oxford: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, I. D. (2007). Understanding material culture. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, X. (2009). Ein Jahrhundert Licht: eine technikethnologische Studie zur Beleuchtung im chinesischen ländlichen Alltag. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Roskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark

    Mikkel Bille

Authors
  1. Mikkel Bille
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mikkel Bille .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Educational Anthropology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark

    Maja Hojer Bruun

  2. Department of Anthropology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Ayo Wahlberg

  3. Department of Business IT, IT University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Rachel Douglas-Jones

  4. Department of Educational Anthropology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark

    Cathrine Hasse

  5. Center for Medical Science & Technology Studies, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Klaus Hoeyer

  6. Department of Business and Management, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark

    Dorthe Brogård Kristensen

  7. Department of Business IT, IT University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Brit Ross Winthereik

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bille, M. (2022). Material Culture Studies: Objectification, Agency, and Intangibility. In: Bruun, M.H., et al. The Palgrave Handbook of the Anthropology of Technology. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7084-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7084-8_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-7083-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-7084-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation