Skip to main content

Assembling Population Data in the Field: The Labour, Technologies, and Materialities of Quantification

Survey

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of the Anthropology of Technology
  • 2641 Accesses

Abstract

The concept of ‘population’ has enabled a long parade of biopolitical interventions and experiments in the Global South. Guided by abstractions such as birth rates, GDP, infant mortality, HIV prevalence, and longevity, and underpinned by racialised calculations of life and value, these projects rely on technologies of quantification that materialise data and ways of seeing that make data matter. Ethnographic study of the relations and transactions that comprise the work of making numbers draws attention to the social lives of data. Presenting a case study from rural Malawi—where demographers return year after year to administer household-level surveys—this chapter tracks the unfolding discursive and material production of data within a specific sociotechnical assemblage that constitutes the demographer’s ‘field’. In the process, it reviews key concepts drawn from science and technology studies and anthropological literature, with particular attention to ethnographies of counting and classification, and of the field sciences. The chapter concludes with brief reflections on anthropology’s equivocal relationship to population data and technologies of quantification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Booklet accessed in the Malawi National Archives (‘The British Empire Exhibit’).

  2. 2.

    Even as audiences were made to feel part of something larger (‘mak[ing] the peoples of empire better known to one another’), the displays were rooted in representations of fundamental cultural difference that upheld racialised partitions between developed and undeveloped populations. Displays were ‘calculated to arouse public interest in all efforts to conquer disease and unhealthy conditions of existence’, for example (‘The British Empire Exhibit’). In this sense, the exhibit produced population in two senses of the word: imperial totality and (other) people boxed together as distanced object in need of intervention (Murphy 2017, p. 135).

  3. 3.

    Greenhalgh (1996, p. 29) points out that an overemphasis on the racism of demographic science, in particular, produces ‘demographic exceptionalism’.

  4. 4.

    In addition to the field-based enumeration projects described in this chapter, demographers also draw on vital statistics registries as data sources; as Jerven (2013) argues, statistical capacity and state infrastructures for making reliable and timely numbers are generally weak in Africa, making statistics registries an absent or poor source of data on the continent (see also Zuberi et al. 2003).

References

  • Adams, V. (2016). Metrics: What Counts in Global Health. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, J. W., and Kasanoff, A. B. (2004). Spillovers, subdivisions and flows: Questioning the usefulness of ‘bounded container’ as the dominant spatial metaphor in demography. In S. Szreter, H. Sholkamy, and A. Dharmalingam (Eds.), Categories and Contexts: Anthropological and Historical Studies in Demography. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allman, J. (1994). Making mothers: Missionaries, medical officers, and women’s work in colonial Asante, 1924–1945. History Workshop, 38, 23–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anand, N. (2011). Pressure: The politechnics of water supply in Mumbai. Cultural Anthropology, 26(4), 542–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, W. (2009). From subjugated knowledge to conjugated subjects: Science and globalisation, or postcolonial studies of science? Postcolonial Studies, 12(4), 389–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angus, I., and Butler, S. (2011). Too Many People?: Population, Immigration, and the Environmental Crisis. Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appadurai, A. (1993). Number in the colonial imagination. In C. A. Breckenridge and P. van der Veer (Eds.), Orientalism and the Postcolonial Predicament: Perspectives on South Asia (pp. 314–340). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs, 28(3), 801–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Belcher, E. (1923). The dominion and colonial sections of the British empire exhibition. Journal of the Royal Society of Arts, 71(3674), 388–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benton, A., and Sangaramoorthy, T. (2012). Enumeration, identity, health. Medical Anthropology, 31(4), 287–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, V., and Petty, C. (1992). The Nyasaland Survey Papers, 1938–1943. London: Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatia, R., Sasser, J. S., Ojeda, D., Hendrixson, A., Nadimapally, S., and Foley, E. E. (2019). A feminist exploration of ‘populationism:’ Engaging contemporary forms of population control. Gender, Place and Culture, 27(3), 333–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biruk, C. (2012). Seeing like a research project: Producing ‘high quality data’ in AIDS research in Malawi. Medical Anthropology, 31(4), 347–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biruk, C. (2018). Cooking Data: Culture and Politics in an African Research World. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Biruk, C. (2019). The MSM category as bureaucratic technology: Reflections on paperwork and project time in performance-based aid economies. Medicine Anthropology Theory, 6(4), 187–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bledsoe, C. (2002). Contingent Lives; Fertility, Time, and Aging in West Africa. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bohon, S. A. (2018). Demography in the big data revolution: Changing the culture to forge new frontiers. Population Research and Policy Review, 37, 323–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonneuil, C. (2000). Development as experiment: Science and state building in late colonial and postcolonial Africa, 1930–1970. Osiris, 15, 258–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowker, G. (2005). Memory Practices in the Sciences. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowker, G., and Leigh Star, S. (1999). Sorting Things Out: Classification and its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, D. (2005). The corporeality of expertise. Ethnos, 70(2), 243–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brives, C. (2013). Identifying ontologies in a clinical trial. Social Studies of Science, 43(3), 397–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B. B. (1987). Facing the ‘black peril’: The politics of population control in South Africa. Journal of Southern African Studies, 13(2), 256–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M. (2002). Writing and (re) writing devices as tools for managing complexity. In J. Law and A. Mol (Eds.), Complexities: Social Studies of Knowledge Practices (pp. 191–217). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M., and Law, J. (1997). After the individual in society: Lessons on collectivity from science, technology and society. The Canadian Journal of Sociology, 22(2), 165–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Candea, M. (2010). I fell in love with Carlos the meerkat: Engagement and detachment in human-animal relations. American Ethnologist, 37(2), 241–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavanagh, J. R. (2016). Documenting subjects: Performativity and audit culture in food production in northern Italy. American Ethnologist, 43(4), 691–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, B. S. (1998). The census, social structure, and objectification in South Asia. In An Anthropologist Among the Historians and Other Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constantine, S. (1984). The Making of British Colonial Development Policy, 1914–1940. Totowa, NJ: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, M., and Waldby, C. (2014). Clinical Labor: Tissue Donors and Research Subjects in the Global Bioeconomy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Coopmans, C., and Button, G. (2014). Eyeballing expertise. Social Studies of Science, 44(5), 758–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz, T. M. (2016). The making of a population: Challenges, implications, and consequences of the quantification of social difference. Social Science & Medicine, 174, 79–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtin, P. D. (1961). The white man’s grave: Image and reality, 1780–1850. Journal of British Studies, 1(1), 94–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixey, F. (1928). The distribution of population in Nyasaland. Geographical Review, 18(2), 274–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doing, P. (2008). Give me a laboratory and I will raise the discipline: The past, present, and future politics of laboratory studies in STS. In E. J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. E. Lynch, and J. Wacjman (Eds.), The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (pp. 279–295). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, S. (2019a). Global health futures? Reckoning with a pandemic bond. Medicine Anthropology Theory, 6(3), 77–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, S. (2019b). Faking global health. Critical Public Health, 29(4), 508–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escobar, A. (1994). Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, M. (2019). Witch hunts and census conflicts: Becoming a population in colonial Massachusetts. American Quarterly, 71(3), 653–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fearnley, L. (2015). Wild goose chase: The displacement of influenza research in the fields of Poyang Lake, China. Cultural Anthropology, 30(1), 12–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, M. J. (2007). Four geneaologies for a recombinant anthropology of science and technology. Cultural Anthropology, 22(4), 539–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2008). The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankfurter, R. (2019). Conjuring biosecurity in the post-Ebola Kissi Triangle: The magic of paperwork in a frontier clinic. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 33(4), 517–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gammeltoft, T. M. (2008). Figures of transversality: State power and prenatal screening in contemporary Vietnam. American Ethnologist, 35(4), 570–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geissler, P. W. (2013). Public secrets in public health: Knowing not to know while making scientific knowledge. American Ethnologist, 40(1), 13–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geissler, P. W., Lachenal, G., Manton, J., and Tousignant, N. (Eds.) (2016). Traces of the Future: An Archaeology of Medical Science in Africa. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graboyes, M. (2015). The Experiment must Continue: Medical Research and Ethics in East Africa, 1940–2014. Columbus, OH: Ohio University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh, S. (Ed.) (1995). Situating Fertility: Anthropology and Demographic Inquiry. New York City, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh, S. (1996). The social construction of population science: An intellectual, institutional, and political history of twentieth-century demography. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 38(1), 26–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A., and Ferguson, J. (1997). Discipline and practice: the ‘field’ as site, method, and location in anthropology. In Anthropological Locations: Boundaries and Grounds of a Field Science (pp. 1–46). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halfon, S. (2006). The disunity of consensus: International population policy coordination as socio-technical practice. Social Studies of Science, 36(5), 783–807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. (2009). Postcolonial and feminist philosophies of science and technology: Convergences and dissonances. Postcolonial Studies, 12(4), 401–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harkavy, O. (1995). Curbing Population Growth: An Insider’s Perspective on the Population Movement. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, B. (2016). Reproductive Rights and Wrongs: The Global Politics of Population Control. Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heggie, V. (2016). Higher and colder: The success and failure of boundaries in high altitude and Antarctic research stations. Social Studies of Science, 46(6), 809–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoeyer, K. (2019). Data as promise: Reconfiguring Danish public health through personalized medicine. Social Studies of Science, 49(4), 531–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull, M. (2012). Documents and bureaucracy. Annual Review of Anthropology, 41, 251–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irani, L. (2019). Chasing Innovation: Making Entrepreneurial Citizens in Modern India. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ittman, K. (2010). Where nature dominates man: Demographic ideas and policy in British colonial Africa, 1890–1970. In D. D. Cordell, K. Ittman, and G. H. Maddox (Eds.), The Demographics of Empire: The Colonial Order and the Creation of Knowledge (pp. 59–88). Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, N. (2016). Birders of Africa: History of a Network. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jerven, M. (2013). Poor Numbers: How We Are Misled by African Development Statistics and What to Do About It. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Hanks, J. (2007). Natural intentions: Fertility decline in the African Demographic and Health Surveys. American Journal of Sociology, 112(4), 1008–1043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalender, U., and Holmberg, C. (2019). Courtesy work: Care practices for quality assurance in a cohort study. Social Studies of Science, 49(4), 583–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, A. H., and Lezaun, J. (2017). The wild indoors: Room-spaces of scientific inquiry. Cultural Anthropology, 32(3), 367–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingori, P., and Gerrets, R. (2016). Morals, morale and motivations in data fabrication: Medical research fieldworkers views and practices in two sub-Saharan African contexts. Social Science and Medicine, 166, 150–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingori, P., and Gerrets, R. (2019a). The masking and making of fieldworkers and data in postcolonial Global Health research contexts. Critical Public Health, 29(4), 494–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingori, P., and Gerrets, R. (2019b). Why the pseudo matters to global health. Critical Public Health, 29(4), 379–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knorr Cetina, K. (1995). Laboratory studies: The cultural approach to the study of science. In S. Jasanoff, G. E. Markle, J. C. Peterson, and T. Pinch (Eds.), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (pp. 140–167). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kowal, E., Radin, J., and Reardon, J. (2013). Indigenous body parts, mutating temporalities, and the half-lives of postcolonial technoscience. Social Studies of Science, 43(4), 465–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuklick, H., and Kohler, R.E. (1996). Science in the field: Introduction. Osiris, 11, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambek, M. (1993). Knowledge and Practice in Mayotte: Local Discourses of Islam, Sorcery, and Spirit Possession. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B., and Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory Life. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. (2009). Seeing like a survey. Cultural Sociology, 3(2), 239–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law, J., and Lien M. E. (2012). Slippery: Field notes in empirical ontology. Social Studies of Science, 43(3), 363–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livingston, J. (2012). Improvising Medicine: An African Oncology Ward in an Emerging Cancer Epidemic. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lorimer, J. (2008). Counting corncrakes: The affective science of the UK corncrake census. Social Studies of Science, 38(3), 377–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maes, K. (2017). The Lives of Community Health Workers: Local Labor and Global Health in Urban Ethiopia. New York City, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mamdani, M. (2012). Define and Rule: Native as Political Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, K. A. (2018). Quantitative care: Caring for the aggregate in US academic population health sciences. American Ethnologist, 45(2), 201–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKay, R. (2018). Medicine in the Meantime: The Work of Care in Mozambique. Durham, NC.: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Medina-Doménach, R. (2009). Scientific technologies of national identity as colonial legacies: Extracting the Spanish nation from Equatorial Guinea. Social Studies of Science, 39(1), 81–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merry, S. E. (2011). Measuring the world: Indicators, human rights, and global governance. Current Anthropology, 52(S3), S83–S95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, T. (1988). Colonising Egypt. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mol, A. (2002). The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mol, A. (2010). Actor-Network Theory: Sensitive terms and enduring tensions. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialphyschologie. Sonderheft, 50, 253–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molyneux, S., Kamuya, D., Madiega, P.A., Chantler, T., Angwenyi, V., and Geissler, P.W. (2013). Fieldworkers at the interface. Developing World Bioethics, 13(1), ii–iv.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulwafu, W. O. (2011). Conservation Song: A History of Peasant-State Relations and the Environment in Malawi, 1860–2000. Winwick, UK: White Horse Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, M. (2012). Seizing the Means of Reproduction: Entanglements of Feminism, Health, and Technoscience. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, M. (2017). The Economization of Life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nading, A. M. (2012). Dengue mosquitos are single mothers: Biopolitics meets ecological aesthetics in Nicaraguan community health work. Cultural Anthropology, 27(4), 572–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nading, A. M. (2013). Love isn’t there in your stomach: A moral economy of medical citizenship among Nicaraguan community health workers. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 27(1), 84–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oudshoorn, N. (1997). From population control politics to chemicals: The WHO as an intermediary organization in contraceptive development. Social Studies of Science, 27, 41–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petryna, A. (2009). When Experiments Travel: Clinical Trials and the Global Search for Human Subjects. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Prince, R. J. (2020). From Russia with love: Medical modernities, development dreams, and Cold War legacies in Kenya, 1969 and 2015. Africa, 90(1), 51–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raj, K. (2007). Relocating Modern Science: Circulation and the Construction of Knowledge in South Asia and Europe, 1650–1900. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rajan, K.S. (2017). Pharmocracy: Value, Politics, and Knowledge in Global Biomedicine. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Randall, S., Coast, E., and Leone, T. (2011). Cultural constructions of the concept of household in sample surveys. Population Studies, 65(2), 217–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redfield, P. (2012). Bioexpectations: Life technologies as humanitarian goods. Public Culture, 24(1(66)), 157–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richey, L. (1999). Family planning and the politics of population in Tanzania: International to local discourse. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 37(3), 457–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riles, A. (2006). Documents: Artifacts of Modern Knowledge. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rizzo, L. (2014). Visual impersonation: Population registration, reference books and identification in the Eastern Cape, 1950s–1960s. History in Africa, 41, 221–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodney, W. (1972). How Europe Underdeveloped Africa. London, UK: Bogle-L’Overture Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sariola, S., and Simpson, R. (2019). Research as Development: Biomedical Research, Ethics, and Collaboration in Sri Lanka. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sasser, J. (2018). On Infertile Ground: Population Control and Women’s Rights in the Era of Climate Change. New York City, NY: NYU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheper-Hughes, N. (1997). Demography without numbers. In D. I. Kertzer and T. Fricke (Eds.), Anthropological Demography: Toward a New Synthesis (pp. 201–222). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumaker, L. (2001). Africanizing Anthropology: Fieldwork, Networks, and the Making of Cultural Knowledge in Central Africa. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, S. (1989). The invisible technician. American Scientist, 77(6), 554–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpless, J. (1995). World population growth, family planning, and American foreign policy. Journal of Policy History, 7(1), 72–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Star, S. L. (1999). The ethnography of infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(3), 377–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoler, A. L., and Cooper, F. (1997). Between metropole and colony: Rethinking a research agenda. In Tensions of Empire: Colonial Cultures in a Bourgeois World (pp. 1–58). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Street, A. (2014). Biomedicine in an Unstable Place: Infrastructure and Personhood in a Papua New Guinea Hospital. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Summers, C. (1991). Intimate colonialism: The imperial production of reproduction in Uganda, 1907–1925. Signs, 16(4), 787–807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swartz, A. (2013). Legacy, legitimacy and possibility: An exploration of community health worker experience across the generations in Khayelitsha, South Africa. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 27(2), 139–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swidler, A., and Watkins, S. C. (2017). A Fraught Embrace: The Romance and Reality of AIDS Altruism in Africa. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Szreter, S. (1993). The idea of demographic transition and the study of fertility change: A critical intellectual history. Population and Development Review, 19(4), 659–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TallBear, K. (2013). Native American DNA: Tribal Belonging and the False Promise of Genetic Science. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tantchou, J. C. (2014). Blurring boundaries: Structural constraints, space, tools, and agency in an operating theater. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 39(3), 336–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tichenor, M. (2016). The power of data: Global health citizenship and the Senegalese data retention strike. In V. Adams (Ed.), Metrics: What Counts in Global Health (pp. 105–124). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tichenor, M. (2017). Data performativity, performing health work: Malaria and Labor in Senegal. Medical Anthropology, 36(5), 436–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilley, H. (2011). Africa as a Living Laboratory: Empire, Development, and the Problem of Scientific Knowledge, 1870–1950. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tousignant, N. (2018). Edges of Exposure: Toxicology and the Problem of Capacity in Postcolonial Senegal. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • True, G., Alexander, L. B., and Richman, K. A. (2011). Misbehaviors of frontline research personnel and the integrity of community-based research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 6(2), 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Bersselaar, D. (2006). Acknowledging knowledge: Dissemination and reception of expertise in colonial Africa. History in Africa, 33, 389–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, M. (1991). Curing Their Ills: Colonial Power and African Illness. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkat, B. J. (2019). A vital mediation: The sanitorium, before and after antibiotics. Technology and Culture, 60(4), 979–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vertesi, J. (2012). Seeing like a rover: Visualization, embodiment, and interaction on the Mars exploration rover mission. Social Studies of Science, 42(3), 393–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolgar, S. (1982). Laboratory studies: A comment on the state of the art. Social Studies of Science, 12(4), 481–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuberi, T., Sibanda, A., Bawah, A., and Noumbissi, A. (2003). Population and African society. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 465–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Many thanks to the editors of this volume for their leadership and direction, and to the anonymous reviewers who provided generous feedback that helped fine-tune this chapter. Thanks also to Lyndsey Beutin for helpful suggestions. Finally, I am grateful to the authors who have produced the fine scholarship I engage here.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cal Biruk .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Biruk, C. (2022). Assembling Population Data in the Field: The Labour, Technologies, and Materialities of Quantification. In: Bruun, M.H., et al. The Palgrave Handbook of the Anthropology of Technology. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7084-8_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7084-8_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-7083-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-7084-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics