Skip to main content

From Aristotle to Structural Dynamics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Neuroscience for Organizational Communication
  • 558 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter ties the ancient Aristotelian rhetorical appeals with modern systems theory, specifically David Kantor’s theory of structural dynamics. We examine a neuroscientific basis for structural dynamics, and how this might be a game-changing framework for communicators to use. We also touch on neuromania and the importance of communicators being shrewd and discerning consumers of scientific information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • American Psychological Association. (n.d.). Clinical neuropsychology. In APA dictionary of psychology. Retrieved August 22, 2021, from https://dictionary.apa.org/clinical-neuropsychology

  • American Psychological Association. (n.d.). Cognitive neuropsychology. In APA dictionary of psychology. Retrieved August 22, 2021, from https://dictionary.apa.org/cognitive-neuropsychology

  • Boyatzis, R. E. (2014). Possible contributions to leadership and management development from neuroscience. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 13, 300–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. R. (2005). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goleman, D., & Boyatzis, R. (2008). Social intelligence and the biology of leadership. Harvard Business Review, 86(9), 74–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, A. (2015, April 6). Heads of business need neuroscience. Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/11812676-d79a-11e4-94b1-00144feab7de

  • Kantor, D. (2012). Reading the room: Group dynamics for coaches and leaders. Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellerman, B. (2012). The end of leadership. HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellerman, B. (2016). Leadership—It’s a system, not a person! Daedalus, 145(3), 83–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelzén, A. (2017). Aristotle on social media? Investigating non-profit organizations’ usage of persuasive language on Twitter and Facebook. Bachelor’s thesis, Linneuversitetet, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pillay, S. S. (2011). Your brain and business: The neuroscience of great leaders. Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ralston, M. (2016). A neurological perspective on the effects of resonant and dissonant leadership behaviors on followers and perceived psychological safety. Doctoral dissertation, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing (UMI No. 10131847).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (2010). Aristotle’s rhetoric. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2010/entries/aristotle-rhetoric/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura McHale .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

McHale, L. (2022). From Aristotle to Structural Dynamics. In: Neuroscience for Organizational Communication. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7037-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics