Skip to main content

Indicators-Based Environmental Performance Assessment for China’s Total Emission Reduction Policy During the 11th FYP (2006–2010)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Environmental Policy and Reform in China

Abstract

This report is product of cooperation project between Chemicals Branch, DTIE, UNEP and CAEP, MEP, China under Small-Scale Funding Agreement (No.NF/4030–10-62–2201) signed in 27th Jan, 2011 with 30,000USD funds from UNEP to CAEP (Phase I) and a continuation SSFA was (No.NF/4030–10-85) signed in 26th, Nov, 2012 with 28,500 USD funds from UNEP to CAEP as supporting (Phase II). In phase I, the project aims to adopt international best practice and policy evaluation tools to assess policy performance of China’s Total Emission Reduction Policy in the period of 2006–2010 (11th FYP) at national level and pilots study in provincial level. While in the research, the project has adopted DPISR conceptual framework to form an indictaors-based evaluation system to assess the policy performance at implementation stage. In phase II, the project has three research tasks: 1 Revise the indictaors-based evaluation system at national level according to the new requirements of the policy in 12th FYP (2011–2015) in which two complusory reduction pollutants became to four; 2 Establish indictaors-based evaluation system for provincial and municipal level based on statistical characteristics; 3 Develop indictaors-based evaluation system for sectoral level, the pilot study was carried out in textile sector. Upon the project completion in 2013, it has quantified Total Emission Reduction Policy performance at national level between 2006 and 2010 and proposed a series of mature methods for assessing performance of emission reduction policy at provincial, municipal and sectoral level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

COD:

Chemical Oxygen Demand

DPSIR:

Driving forces Pressure States Impacts Responses

EEA:

European Environment Agency

EI:

Environmental Indicator

EPA:

Environmental Performance Assessment

FYP:

Five Years Plan

IIASA:

International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis

IMAGE:

Integrated Model to Assess the Global Environment

MEP:

Ministry of Environmental Protection

OECD:

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development

RAINS:

Regional Air Pollution Information and Simulation

RIVM:

Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment

SO2:

Sulfur Dioxide

UNEP:

United Nations Environment Programme

References

  1. Andrew Kell J (2006) An overview of the RAINS model environmental research centre report. Environmental Protection Agency, Ireland. http://www.epa.ie/downloads/pubs/research/air/epa_overview_of_rains_model_erc4.pdf

  2. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) (2008) GAINS Asia Scenarios for cost-effective control of air pollution and greenhouses gases in China. Laxenburg, Austria

    Google Scholar 

  3. OECD (2008) OECD Key environmental indicators 2008. Paris France, OECD. Environnent Director at http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/20/40/37551205.pdf

  4. OECD (2005) Environmental performance review of China: lessons learned from Yunnan Province Experience, Kunming. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/62/33/35414971.pdf

  5. UNEP (2004) Integrated assessment and planning for sustainable development guidelines for pilot projects, Version 1. http://www.unep.ch/etb/Topics/inteAsse/IAPGuidelinesPilotProjectsEN.pdf

  6. European Environment Agency (2003) Environmental indicators: typology and use in reporting. Copenhagen. http://www.brahmatwinn.uni-jena.de/fileadmin/Geoinformatik/projekte/brahmatwinn/Workshops/FEEM/Indicators/EEA_Working_paper_DPSIR.pdf

  7. European Environment Agency. Environmental indicators: typology and overview, Copenhagen, Technical Report No 25/1999. http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/TEC25

  8. European Environment Agency. EEA core set of indicators—Guide. Copenhagen, Technical report No 1/2005. http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/technical_report_2005_1

  9. GMS Environment Operations Center. Environmental performance assessment. Bangkok Thailand. (Accessed on 2011) http://www.gms-eoc.org/CEP/Comp3/docs/EPA_Synthesis_Report.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dong Cao .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Yang, W., Cao, D., Zhao, X. (2022). Indicators-Based Environmental Performance Assessment for China’s Total Emission Reduction Policy During the 11th FYP (2006–2010). In: Wang, J., Jiang, H., Yan, G. (eds) Environmental Policy and Reform in China. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6905-7_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics