Skip to main content

The Rise of China in the Global Governance of Climate Change: From 2009 Copenhagen Summit to 2015 Paris Negotiations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Climate Change Discourse in China
  • 357 Accesses

Abstract

Climate change is seen as one of significant global crises. China’s contribution and participation is a key to global success in addressing climate change. International pressures and rapid growth of economy and emissions could be understood as important drivers of a change in China’s climate change policies and positions. However, they may exert influences over climate policy through discourse. For this reason, this work raises the central research question: How do domestic political discourses shape China’s resolution on the leadership of global governance of climate change? This chapter argues that the change in domestic political discourse makes a great contribution to China’s positions on climate change. Research methods involve the discourse analysis of policy documents in 2009 and 2015.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bjørkum, I. (2005). China in the international politics of climate change: A foreign policy analysis. The Fridtjof Nansen Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolin, B. (2007). A history of the science and politics of climate change: The role of the intergovernmental panel on climate change.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christoff, P. (2010). Cold climate in Copenhagen: China and the United States at COP15. Environmental Politics, 19, 637–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullet, P. (2010). Common but differentiated responsibilities. Research Handbook on International Environmental Law, 161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrov, R. S. (2016). The Paris agreement on climate change: Behind closed doors. Global Environmental Politics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economy, E. C. (2010). The river runs black: the environmental challenge to China’s future. Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferdinand, P., & Wang, J. (2013). China and the IMF: From mimicry towards pragmatic international institutional pluralism. International Affairs, 89, 895–910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foot, R., & Walter, A. (2010). China, the United States, and global order. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Green, F., & Stern, N. (2016). China's changing economy: implications for its carbon dioxide emissions. Climate Policy, 1-15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajer, M., & Versteeg, W. (2005). A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: Achievements, challenges, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 7, 175–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajer, M. & Wytske, V. (2013). Voices of vulnerability: The reconfiguration of policy discourses. In J. S. Dryzek, B. N. Richard, & S. David (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of climate change and society. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, P. G. (2010). China and climate change: From Copenhagen to Cancun.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, P. G., Chow, A. S., & Karlsson, R. (2013). China and climate justice: Moving beyond statism. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 13, 291–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, P. G., & Yu, H. (2005). Environmental change and the Asia Pacific: China responds to global warming. Global Change, Peace & Security, 17, 45–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatch, M. T. (2003). Chinese politics, energy policy, and the international climate change negotiations. In Global warming and East Asia: The domestic and international politics of climate change, 43¨C65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heggelund, G., Andresen, S., & Buan, I. F. (2010). Chinese climate policy: Domestic priorities, foreign policy and emerging implementation. In Global commons, domestic decisions: The comparative politics of climate change (pp. 229-259).

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, D., Nag, E. M. & Roger, C. (2011, January). The governance of climate change in China preliminary Report, LSE-AFD Climate Governance Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochstetler, K., & Viola, E. (2012). Brazil and the politics of climate change: beyond the global commons. Environmental Politics, 21, 753–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurrell, A., & Sengupta, S. (2012). Emerging powers, North-South relations and global climate politics. International Affairs, 88, 463–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC. (2014). Climate change 2014 synthesis report summary for policymakers. The Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, D. (2010). China’s climate change policy process: Improved but still weak and fragmented. Journal of Contemporary China, 19, 971–986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M. F. (2010). Understanding China's political system. DTIC Document.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mcmullen-Laird, L., Zhao, X., Gong, M., & Mcmullen, S. J. (2015). Air pollution governance as a driver of recent climate policies in China. CCLR, 243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mol, A. P. J., & Carter, N. T. (2006). China’s environmental governance in transition. Environmental Politics, 15, 149–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NDRC. (2007). China’s national climate change programme. National Development and Reform Commissions.

    Google Scholar 

  • NDRC. (2016). China's policies and actions on climate change. The National Development and Reform Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qiu, X., & Li, H. (2009). China's environmental super ministry reform: Background, challenges, and the future. Environmental Law Reporter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajamani, L. (2000). The principle of common but differentiated responsibility and the balance of commitments under the climate regime. Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 9, 120–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saich, T. (2016). State-society relations in the people’s Republic of China post-1949. Brill Research Perspectives in Governance and Public Policy in China, 1, 1–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreurs, M. A. (2016). The Paris climate agreement and the three largest emitters: China, the United States, and the European Union. Politics and Governance, 4, 219–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • StateCouncil. (2009). Report on the work of the government. The State Council of China.

    Google Scholar 

  • StateCouncil. (2015). Report on the work of the government. The State Council of China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stensdal, I. (2014). Chinese climate-change policy, 1988–2013: Moving on up. Asian Perspective, 38, 111–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stensdal, I. (2015). China: Every day is a winding road. In The domestic politics of global climate change: Key actors in international climate cooperation, 49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsang, S., & Kolk, A. (2010). The evolution of Chinese policies and governance structures on environment, energy and climate. Environmental Policy and Governance, 20, 180–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN. (2014). First steps to a safer future: Introducing the United Nations framework convention on climate change [Online]. http://unfccc.int/essential_background/convention/items/6036.php [Accessed 20/11/2014].

  • WB. (2016a). Data [Online]. The World Bank. http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG?end=2015&locations=CN&name_desc=false&start=2000&view=chart [Accessed 13/01/2017].

  • WB. (2016b). Total greenhouse gas emissions [Online]. The World Bank. [Accessed 05/01/2019].

    Google Scholar 

  • WRI. (2014). 6 graphs explain the world’s top 10 emitters [Online]. World Resources Institute. http://www.wri.org/blog/2014/11/6-graphs-explain-world%E2%80%99s-top-10-emitters [Accessed 07/10/2016].

  • WRI. (2016). Statement: India joins Paris agreement on climate change [Online]. World Resources Institute. http://www.wri.org/news/2016/10/statement-india-joins-paris-agreement-climate-change [Accessed 16/10/2016].

  • Wübbeke, J. (2013). China’s climate change expert community—Principles, mechanisms and influence. Journal of Contemporary China, 22, 712–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xinhuanet. (2016, January 10). Xi Jinping's three ideas of green development: Improving people's lives, promoting economic development and delivering a promise (习近平绿色发展三大思路: 绿色惠民、绿色富国、绿色承诺). Xinhuanet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, H.-Y., & Zhu, S.-L. (2015). Toward Paris: China and climate change negotiations. Advances in Climate Change Research, 6, 56–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y. Z., & Yongnian (2008). New development in China’s climate change policy. China House University of Nottingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Z. (2003). The forces behind China’s climate change policy. In Global warming and East Asia: The domestic and international politics of climate change (pp. 66-85). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sidan Wang .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wang, S. (2022). The Rise of China in the Global Governance of Climate Change: From 2009 Copenhagen Summit to 2015 Paris Negotiations. In: Climate Change Discourse in China. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6754-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6754-1_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-6753-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-6754-1

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics