Abstract
This chapter introduces the basic concept of large eddy simulation (LES) and the sub-grid-scale models. Specific treatments on the spray models and turbulent combustion models in the framework of LES are discussed. The combustion process of a heavy-duty diesel engine that operates under low-temperature combustion mode with early fuel injection is simulated using LES with a dynamic structure model and unsteady RANS with the RNG k-epsilon model. The SAGE model, a direct chemistry model, is used as the combustion model. Two different skeleton n-heptane reaction mechanisms, the ERC mechanism, and the Chalmers mechanism are considered. The results are compared with available experimental data. It is found that the predictions of pressure trace and heat release rate depend more on the reaction mechanism. With the ERC mechanism, both LES and RANS can reproduce the pressure trace. The LES shows a more detailed flow structure and a larger area of the flame front. The LES is a good tool to investigate some transient phenomena but is still not suitable for design optimization purposes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Abbreviations
- a 4 , b 3 , b 1 :
-
Model constants (–)
- C :
-
Model constant (–)
- C k , σ k , C ε :
-
Model constants (–)
- C s :
-
Adjustable model constant (–)
- C s , dyn :
-
Model constant (–)
- C ν :
-
Model constant in the formulation of turbulent viscosity in the SGS model (–)
- Da:
-
Damkohler number (–)
- DNS:
-
Direct numerical simulation (–)
- ERC:
-
Engine Research Center at University of Wisconsin–Madison (–)
- F b :
-
Body force (Nm−3)
- F s :
-
Source term due to spray (Nm−3)
- FTS:
-
Flamelet timescale (–)
- G (x; y) :
-
Classical filters include box (top-hat) filter, Gaussian filter (–)
- k :
-
Sub-grid turbulent kinetic energy (m2s−2)
- K :
-
“Grid”-level turbulent kinetic energies (m2s−2)
- LES:
-
Large Eddy simulation (–)
- L ij :
-
Double-filtered grid-level sub-grid stress tensor is the Leonard stress term (m2s−2)
- l τ :
-
Turbulent length scale (m)
- M ij :
-
Deviatory part of Lij (m2s−2)
- QSF:
-
Quasi-steady flamelet mode (–)
- RANS:
-
Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations (–)
- RNG:
-
Renormalization group (–)
- SGS:
-
Sub-grid scale (–)
- S ij :
-
Strain rate tensor (s−1)
- s l :
-
Laminar flame speed (m/s)
- s t :
-
Turbulent flame speed (m/s)
- T c :
-
Cut-off temperature (K)
- T ij :
-
Sub-grid stress tensor based on the test filter (m/s)
- u :
-
Turbulent velocity (m/s)
- u' :
-
Root mean square of the turbulent fluctuating velocity (m/s)
- V :
-
Local cell volume (m3)
- α :
-
First combustion index is used to distinguish the slow-chemistry regime from the fast-chemistry regime, i.e. depending on the chemical timescale (–)
- Δ :
-
The grid filter that is computed from the local cell volume (m)
- ε :
-
Sub-grid turbulent dissipation of sub-grid kinetic energy (m2s−2)
- ν t :
-
Turbulent viscosity (m2/s)
- ρ :
-
Density (kg/m3)
- σ ij :
-
The viscous term (Pa)
- τ chem :
-
Characteristic timescale describing the duration that the current flamelet proceeds towards its steady state (s)
- τ ij :
-
Sub-grid stress tensor (Pa)
- τ ij :
-
“Grid”-level modelled stress tensor (Pa)
- φ :
-
Arbitrary flow variable (–)
- ω :
-
Specific turbulent dissipation rate (m2/s3)
- \({\mathcal{H}}\) :
-
Heaviside function (–)
- \(\hat{\Delta }\) :
-
Another test filter with a length scale. Usually, this test filter is twice the grid filter (). (m)
- \(\hat{K}\) :
-
“Test” level turbulent kinetic energies (m2s−2)
- \(\hat{\tau }_{ij}\) :
-
“Test” level modelled stress tensor (Pa)
- \(\tilde{\xi }\) :
-
Mean mixture fraction (–)
- \(\tau_{{u_{j} \xi }}\) :
-
Flux of the mean of mixture fraction (s−1)
- \(\chi_{{{\text{SGS}}}}\) :
-
Sub-grid-scale scalar dissipation rate (m2/s3)
- \(\tilde{Y}_{i}^{{{\text{lib}}}}\) :
-
Mass fraction calculated from the flamelet library (–)
- \(\chi\) :
-
Local scalar dissipation rate (m2/s3)
- \(\chi_{c}\) :
-
Criterion of scalar dissipation rate between the diffusion flamelet regime and the partially premixed regime (m2/s3)
- \(\gamma\) :
-
Local mixture homogeneity, second combustion index used to distinguish the quasi-steady homogeneous regime from the quasi-steady diffusion flamelet regime (–)
- u :
-
An unburnt region (–)
- i, j, k :
-
Component along x-, y-, and z-directions (–)
References
Adomeit P, Lang O, Pischinger S, Aymanns R, Graf M, Stapf G (2007) Analysis of cyclic fluctuations of charge motion and mixture formation in a DISI engine in stratified operation. SAE Trans 935–942
Amsden AA, O'rourke PJ, Butler TD (1989) KIVA-II: a computer program for chemically reactive flows with sprays. Los Alamos National Lab., NM (USA)
Banerjee S, Liang T, Rutland C, Hu B (2010) Validation of an LES multi-mode combustion model for diesel combustion. In: SAE Technical Paper 2010-01-0361. https://doi.org/10.4271/2010-01-0361
Beale JC, Reitz RD (1999) Modeling spray atomization with the Kelvin-Helmholtz/Rayleigh-Taylor hybrid model. Atom Sprays 9(6). https://doi.org/10.1615/AtomizSpr.v9.i6.40
Bharadwaj N, Rutland CJ, Chang S-M (2009) Large-eddy simulation modelling of spray-induced turbulence effects. Int J Engine Res 10(2):97–119
Bobba MK, Genzale CL, Musculus MPB (2009) Effect of ignition delay on in-cylinder soot characteristics of a heavy-duty diesel engine operating at low-temperature conditions. SAE Int J Engines 2(1):911–924
Bobba MK, Musculus MPB (2012) Laser diagnostics of soot precursors in a heavy-duty diesel engine at low-temperature combustion conditions. Combust Flame 159(2):832–843
Bobba M, Musculus M, Neel W (2010) Effect of post injections on in-cylinder and exhaust soot for low-temperature combustion in a heavy-duty diesel engine. SAE Int J Engines 3(1):496–516
Bolla M, Farrace D, Wright YM, Boulouchos K (2014) Modelling of soot formation in a heavy-duty diesel engine with conditional moment closure. Fuel 117:309–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.09.041
Cantrell BA, Ge HW, Reitz RD, Rutland CJ (2009) Validation of advanced combustion models applied to two-stage combustion in a heavy-duty diesel engine. In: SAE Technical Paper 2009-01-0714. https://doi.org/10.4271/2009-01-0714
Chartier C, Andersson O, Johansson B, Musculus M, Bobba M (2011) Effects of post-injection strategies on near-injector over-lean mixtures and unburned hydrocarbon emission in a heavy-duty optical diesel engine. SAE Int J Engines 4(1):1978–1992
Colin O, Ducros F, Veynante D, Poinsot T (2000) A thickened flame model for large-eddy simulations of turbulent premixed combustion. Phys Fluids 12(7):1843–1863. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.870436
Cui X, Ge H, Wenwang W, Feng Y, Wang J (2021) LES study of the respiratory airflow field in a whole-lung airway model considering steady respiration. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 43(3):141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-021-02871-3
Cui X, Wenwang W, Ge H (2020) Investigation of airflow field in the upper airway under unsteady respiration pattern using large eddy simulation method. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 279:103468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resp.2020.103468
Drake MC, Haworth DC (2007) Advanced gasoline engine development using optical diagnostics and numerical modeling. Proc Combust Inst 31(1):99–124
Genzale CL, Reitz RD, Musculus MPB (2009) Effects of piston bowl geometry on mixture development and late-injection low-temperature combustion in a heavy-duty diesel engine. SAE Int J Engines 1(1):913–937
Genzale CL, Reitz RD, Musculus MPB (2009) Optical diagnostics and multi-dimensional modeling of spray targeting effects in late-injection low-temperature diesel combustion. SAE Int J Engines 2:150–172. https://doi.org/10.4271/2009-01-2699
Germano M, Piomelli U, Moin P, Cabot WH (1991) A dynamic subgrid-scale eddy viscosity model. Phys Fluids A 3(7):1760–1765. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.857955
Han Z, Reitz RD (1995) Turbulence modeling of internal combustion engines using RNG κ-ε models. Combust Sci Technol 106(4–6):267–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/00102209508907782
Hasse C, Sohm V, Durst B (2010) Numerical investigation of cyclic variations in gasoline engines using a hybrid URANS/LES modeling approach. Comput Fluids 39(1):25–48
Hu B, Jhavar R, Singh S, Reitz RD, Rutland CJ (2007) Combustion modeling of diesel combustion with partially premixed conditions. In: SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-0163. https://doi.org/10.4271/2007-01-0163
Hu B, Rutland CJ (2006) Flamelet modeling with LES for diesel engine simulations. In: SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-0058. https://doi.org/10.4271/2006-01-0058.
Hu B, Rutland CJ, Shethaji TA (2010) A mixed-mode combustion model for large-eddy simulation of diesel engines. Combust Sci Technol 182(9):1279–1320. https://doi.org/10.1080/00102201003671410
Jhavar R, Rutland CJ (2006) Using large eddy simulations to study mixing effects in early injection diesel engine combustion. SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-0871. https://doi.org/10.4271/2006-01-0871
Joelsson T, Yu R, Bai XS, Vressner A, Johansson B (2008) Large eddy simulation and experiments of the auto-ignition process of lean ethanol/air mixture in HCCI engines. SAE Int J Fuels Lubr 1(1):1110–1119. https://doi.org/10.4271/2008-01-1668
Johnson J, Ge HW, Naber J, Lee SY, Kurtz E, Robarge N (2013) Investigation of key mechanisms for liquid length fluctuations in transient vaporizing diesel sprays. SAE Int J Engines 6(2013):1202–1212
Lee D, Pomraning E, Rutland CJ (2002) LES modeling of diesel engines. SAE Trans 2566–2578
Li YH, Kong S-C (2008) Diesel combustion modelling using LES turbulence model with detailed chemistry. Combust Theor Model 12(2):205–219
Liu X, Wang H, Yao M (2020) Investigation of the chemical kinetics process of diesel combustion in a compression ignition engine using the large eddy simulation approach. Fuel 270:117544
Mobasheri R, Peng Z (2012) Using large eddy simulation for studying mixture formation and combustion process in a DI diesel engine. SAE Technical Paper 2012-01-1716. https://doi.org/10.4271/2012-01-1716
Muller M, Freeman C, Zhao P, Ge H (2018) Numerical simulation of ignition mechanism in the main chamber of turbulent jet ignition system. In: ASME ICEF2018-9587. https://doi.org/10.1115/icef2018-9587
Musculus MP, Rutland CJ (1995) Coherent flamelet mlodeling of diesel engine combustion. Combust Sci Technol 104(4–6):295–337
Musculus MPB (2005) Measurements of the influence of soot radiation on in-cylinder temperatures and exhaust NOx in a heavy-duty DI diesel engine. SAE Trans 845–866
Musculus MPB (2006) Multiple simultaneous optical diagnostic imaging of early-injection low-temperature combustion in a heavy-duty diesel engine. SAE Trans 83–110
Musculus MPB, Singh S, Reitz RD (2008) Gradient effects on two-color soot optical pyrometry in a heavy-duty DI diesel engine. Combust Flame 153(1–2):216–227
Muthukumar RR, Parameswaran S, Ge H (2020) Assessment of primary atomization models for spray simulation. In: ASME ICEF2020-2945:V001T05A003. https://doi.org/10.1115/ICEF2020-2945
Naitoh K, Itoh T, Takagi Y, Kuwahara K (1992) Large-eddy simulation of premixed-flame in the engine based on the multi-level formulation and the renormalization group theory. SAE Technical Paper 920590. https://doi.org/10.4271/920590
Nordin N (1998) Numerical simulations of non-steady spray combustion using a detailed chemistry approach. In: Licentiate of engineering thesis, department of thermo and fluid dynamics. Chalmers University of Technology, Goteborg, Sweden
Nsikane DM, Vogiatzaki K, Morgan RE, Heikal M, Mustafa K, Ward A, Winder N (2019) Novel approach for adaptive coefficient tuning for the simulation of evaporating high-speed sprays injected into a high-temperature and high-pressure environment. Int J Engine Res1468087419878911
O’Connor J, Musculus M (2013) Optical investigation of the reduction of unburned hydrocarbons using close-coupled post injections at LTC conditions in a heavy-duty diesel engine. SAE Int J Engines 6(1):379–399
O’Connor J, Musculus M (2014) In-cylinder mechanisms of soot reduction by close-coupled post-injection as revealed by imaging of soot luminosity and planar laser-induced soot incandescence in a heavy-duty diesel engine. SAE Int J Engines 7(2):673–693
O’Connor J, Musculus MPB, Pickett LM (2016) Effect of post injections on mixture preparation and unburned hydrocarbon emissions in a heavy-duty diesel engine. Combust Flame 170:111–123
O'Rourke PJ (1981) Collective drop effects on vaporizing liquid sprays. Los Alamos National Lab., NM (USA)
O’Connor J, Musculus M (2014a). Effect of load on close-coupled post-injection efficacy for soot reduction in an optical heavy-duty diesel research engine. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 136(10)
O’Connor J, Musculus M (2014) Effects of exhaust gas recirculation and load on soot in a heavy-duty optical diesel engine with close-coupled post injections for high-efficiency combustion phasing. Int J Engine Res 15(4):421–443
Ottenwaelder T, Pischinger S (2018) Comparing large eddy simulation of a reacting fuel spray with measured quantitative flame parameters. In: SAE Technical Paper 2018-01-1720. https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-01-1720
Patel A, Kong S-C, Reitz RD (2004) Development and validation of a reduced reaction mechanism for HCCI engine simulations. SAE Technical Paper 2004-01-0558. https://doi.org/10.4271/2004-01-0558
Peters N (1999) The turbulent burning velocity for large-scale and small-scale turbulence. J Fluid Mech 384:107–132
Pitsch H (2002) A G-equation formulation for large-eddy simulation of premixed turbulent combustion. Annual Res Briefs 3–14
Pomraning E, Rutland CJ (2002) Dynamic one-equation non viscosity large-eddy simulation model. AIAA J 40(4):689–701
Richard S, Colin O, Vermorel O, Benkenida A, Angelberger C, Veynante D (2007) Towards large eddy simulation of combustion in spark-ignition engines. Proc Combust Inst 31(2):3059–3066
Rutland CJ (2011) Large-eddy simulations for internal combustion engines—a review. Int J Engine Res 12(5):421–451. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468087411407248
Sagaut P (2006) Large-eddy simulation for incompressible flows: an introduction. Springer Science & Business Media
Schmidt DP, Rutland CJ (2000) A new droplet collision algorithm. J Comput Phys 164(1):62–80
Shuai S, Abani N, Yoshikawa T, Reitz RD, Park SW (2009) Simulating low-temperature diesel combustion with improved spray models. Int J Therm Sci 48(9):1786–1799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2009.01.011
Singh S, Reitz RD, Musculus MPB, Lachaux T (2007) Validation of engine combustion models against detailed in-cylinder optical diagnostics data for a heavy-duty compression-ignition engine. Int J Engine Res 8(1):97–126. https://doi.org/10.1243/14680874jer02406
Singh S, Musculus MPB, Reitz RD (2009) Mixing and flame structures inferred from OH-PLIF for conventional and low-temperature diesel engine combustion. Combust Flame 156(10):1898–1908
Singh S, Reitz RD, Musculus MPB (2006) Comparison of the characteristic time (CTC), representative interactive flamelet (RIF), and direct integration with detailed chemistry combustion models against optical diagnostic data for multi-mode combustion in a heavy-duty DI diesel engine. SAE Trans 61–82
Singh S, Reitz RD, Musculus MPB, Lachaux T (2007) Simultaneous optical diagnostic imaging of low-temperature, double-injection combustion in a heavy-duty DI diesel engine. Combust Sci Technol 179(11):2381–2414
Smagorinsky J (1963) General circulation experiments with the primitive equations: I. The basic experiment. Mon Weather Rev 91(3):99–164
Thobois L, Lauvergne R, Poinsot T (2007) Using LES to investigate reacting flow physics in engine design process. SAE Trans 116:165–175
Vermorel O, Richard S, Colin O, Angelberger C, Benkenida A, Veynante D (2007) Multi-cycle LES simulations of flow and combustion in a PFI SI 4-valve production engine. SAE Trans 152–164
Vermorel O, Richard S, Colin O, Angelberger C, Benkenida A, Veynante D (2009) Towards the understanding of cyclic variability in a spark-ignited engine using multi-cycle LES. Combust Flame 156(8):1525–1541
Yu RX, Bai XS, Vressner A, Hultqvist A. Johansson B, Olofsson J, Seyfried H, Sjöholm J, Richter M, Aldén M (2007) Effect of turbulence on HCCI combustion. In: SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-0183. https://doi.org/10.4271/2007-01-0183
Zhang Y, Rutland CJ (2012) A mixing controlled direct chemistry (MCDC) model for diesel engine combustion modelling using large eddy simulation. Combust Theor Model 16(3):571–588
Zhang Y, Rutland CJ (2013) A further evaluation of the mixing controlled direct chemistry (MCDC) combustion model for diesel engine combustion using large eddy simulation. Fuel 105:272–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2012.09.050
Zhao D, Xia Y, Ge H, Lin Q, Wang G (2020) Large-eddy simulation of flame propagation during the ignition process in an annular multiple-injector combustor. Fuel 263:116402
Zhou L, Xie M-Z, Jia M, Shi J-R (2011) Large-eddy simulation of fuel injection and mixing process in a diesel engine. Acta Mech Sin 27(4):519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-011-0485-1
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ge, H. (2022). Large Eddy Simulation of Diesel Engine Combustion. In: Modelling Diesel Combustion. Mechanical Engineering Series. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6742-8_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6742-8_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-6741-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-6742-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)