Skip to main content

Smoke from DI Diesel Engines

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Modelling Diesel Combustion

Part of the book series: Mechanical Engineering Series ((MES))

  • 524 Accesses

Abstract

Although DI diesel engines are becoming popular because of their fuel economy as well as low exhaust emissions, they emit a higher amount of visible exhaust termed as smoke. The characterization of this smoke has remained a challenge in engine development and modelling work. A new phenomenological model is explained in this chapter encompassing the spray and the wall interaction by a simple geometrical consideration. A dimensionless factor was introduced to take care of the nozzle hole manufactured by hydro-erosion (HE) as well as the conical shape of the nozzle hole (k-factor) in the case of valve-closed-orifice type of nozzles. The smoke emitted from the wall–spray formed after wall impingement is the major contributor to the total smoke at higher loads. As the fuel spray impinges upon the walls of the combustion chamber, its velocity decreases. This low-velocity jet contributes to a higher rate of smoke production. Therefore, the combustion bowl geometry along with injection parameters plays a significant role in smoke emissions. While considering the smoke, interestingly the chemical kinetics, which is very fast compared to the mixing phenomenon in the spray entraining the surrounding air, is dropped. Also, the thesis considers the mixing at the wall in detail. The latter enables an explanation of the sudden rise in the rate of increase in smoke at about 50% load for many types of engines at different speeds. Therefore, smoke, the result of incomplete combustion (chemistry), has been treated by ignoring the fast chemistry, as the slow physical mixing seems to be controlling. Though it appears paradoxical, it is the truth. There are mainly two types of smoke from a DI diesel engine, cold and hot smoke. Cold smoke is white in appearance under direct illumination, consisting of a mixture of fuel and lubricating oil particles in an unburned or partly burned state. This form of smoke is sometimes referred to as liquid smoke or fog. Hot smoke is black in appearance, consisting of solid particles of carbon from the otherwise complete combustion of fuel. This form of smoke is often referred to as hot or solid smoke. In the present work, the study is focused on black smoke coming out of diesel engines under hot conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

A 0 :

Effective area of the nozzle hole (m2)

A h :

Area of holes for the escape of soot, a function of Kolmogorov scale (m2)

A s :

Surface area of the spray (m2)

\(c\) :

Circular surface area of spray at the wall (m2)

\(A_{s_{{\text{con}}} }\) :

Surface area of spray considering cone (m2)

\(A_{s_t }\) :

Area of Taylor microscale (m2)

A sw :

Surface area of wall–spray (m2)

Cu:

Constant (0.09)

d e :

Equivalent diameter of the spray hole (m)

degimp:

Degree of impingement (–)

d o :

Spray hole diameter (m)

h :

Gap between adjacent flamelet (m)

η :

Kolmogorov length scale (m)

k :

Turbulent kinetic energy per unit mass (m2/s2)

l m :

Taylor’s microscale (m)

N :

Engine speed (rpm)

n :

Number of spray holes (–)

N f :

Nozzle feature, %HE or KF, e.g. 10%, 15% (%)

n h :

Number of soot holes per unit surface area (–)

n h , free :

Number of smoke holes for the free portion (–)

\(n_{h_{{\text{wall}}} }\) :

Number of smoke holes for wall portion (–)

P inj :

Injection pressure (Pa)

Q :

Injected quantity per stroke (kg)

q ip :

Duration of injection (deg CA)

ρ f :

Fuel density (kg/m3)

ρ s :

Density of soot (2000 kg/m3)

Soot:

Soot (kg/m3)

t dur :

Injection duration (s)

t free :

Time for which spray is free (s)

t imp :

Time at which impingement starts (s)

t int :

Timescale for the integration of smoke passing through holes of size given by Kolmogorov scale (s)

t liq :

Time for which spray is liquid (s)

u inj :

Average velocity of sprays (m/s)

u wall :

Velocity of the wall jet (m/s)

V air :

Volume of air sucked in per cycle (m3)

ε :

Turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate (m2s3)

ν :

Kinematic viscosity of air (m2 s−1)

τ :

Kolmogorov timescale (s)

References

  1. Aghav YV, Lakshminarayanan PA, Babu MKG, Azim U, Dani AD (2007) Validating newly evolved smoke model at widely varying operating conditions of DI diesel engine GTP-06–1096. ASME J Eng Gas Turbines Power

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aghav YV, Sujeet V, Kumar MN, Thatte V, Babu MKG (2007) Simulation of turbocharged DI diesel engine during free acceleration using AVL Boost. In: AVL users international conference, Graz

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aghav YV, Lakshminarayanan PA, Babu MKG, Nayak NS, Dani AD (2005) Phenomenology of smoke from direct injection diesel engines. In: Paper No. 1350, Proceedings of ICEF 2005, ASME

    Google Scholar 

  4. Assanis DN, Filipi ZS, Fiveland SB, Syrimis M (1999) A predictive ignition delay correlation under steady-state and transient operation of a direct injection diesel engine. In: ASME-ICE fall technical conference

    Google Scholar 

  5. AVL Boost 4.1 Users Guide (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. De Risi A, Manieri D, Laforgia D (1999) A theoretical investigation on the effects of combustion chamber geometry and engine speed on soot and NOx emissions. ASME-ICE 99-ICE-207, 33-1

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dec JE, Tree DR (2001) Diffusion-flame/wall interactions in a heavy-duty DI diesel engine. SAE 2001-01-1295

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dent JC (1980) Turbulent mixing rate—its effect on smoke and hydrocarbon emissions from diesel engines. SAE 800092

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dent JC, Mehta PS (1981) Phenomenological combustion model for a quiescent chamber diesel engine. SAE paper 811235

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fusco A, Knox-Kelecy AL, Foster DE (1994) Application of a phenomenological soot model to diesel engine combustion. In: Third international symposium COMODIA

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hulwan DB, Joshi SV, Aghav YV (2007) Smoke prediction for turbocharged DI diesel engine during free acceleration. Int Rev Mech Eng 1:N3

    Google Scholar 

  12. Heywood JB (1988) A text book on internal combustion engine fundamentals. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hiroyasu H et al (1983) Development and use of a spray combustion modeling to predict diesel engine efficiency and pollutant emissions. Bull JSME 26(214)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hiroyasu K (1976) Models for combustion and formation of nitric oxide and soot in direct injection diesel engines. SAE 760129

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kampmann S, Dittus B, Mattes P, Kirner M (1996) The influence of hydrogrinding at VCO nozzles on the mixture preparation in a DI diesel engine. SAE 960867

    Google Scholar 

  16. Khan IM, Greeves G, Wang CHT (1973) Factors affecting smoke and gaseous emissions from direct injection engines and a method of calculation. SAE Transactions, 687–709

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kurtz EM, Foster DE (2004) Identifying a critical time for mixing in a direct injection diesel engine through the study of increased in-cylinder mixing and its effect on emissions through study of increased in-cylinder mixing and its effects on emissions. Int J Engine Res, IMechE 5

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lakshminarayanan PA, Dent JC (1983) Interferometric studies of vapourising and combusting sprays. SAE paper 830244

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lakshminarayanan PA, Aghav YV, Dani AD, Mehta PS (2002) Accurate prediction of the rate of heat release in a modern direct injection diesel engine. IMechE, 216, J Automobile

    Google Scholar 

  20. Magnussen BF, Hjertager HB (1977) On mathematical modeling of turbulent combustion with special emphasis on soot formation and combustion. Symposium (international) on Combustion 16(1): 719–729

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ministry of Road Transport, India (2004) Free acceleration test, MoRTH/CMVR/TAP 115/116

    Google Scholar 

  22. Motor Industry Research Association (MIRA) (1965) The measurement of diesel exhaust smoke. Report No. 10

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nishida, Keiya, and Hiroyuki Hiroyasu. "Simplified three-dimensional modeling of mixture formation and combustion in a DI diesel engine." SAE transactions (1989): 276-293.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Stiesch G (2003) Modelling engine spray and combustion processes. Springer

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Tree DR, Dec JE (2001) Extinction diesel combustion: an integrated view combining laser diagnostics, chemical kinetics, and empirical validation. SAE 2001-01-1296

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lakshminarayanan, P.A., Aghav, Y.V. (2022). Smoke from DI Diesel Engines. In: Modelling Diesel Combustion. Mechanical Engineering Series. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6742-8_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6742-8_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-6741-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-6742-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics