Skip to main content

Natural Hybridization and Reproductive Isolation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Evolutionary Biology of Carabus Ground Beetles

Part of the book series: Entomology Monographs ((ENTMON))

  • 302 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, cases of natural hybridization between Ohomopterus species are reviewed, and the mechanisms of reproductive isolation are considered. Hybrid zones are found between parapatric species within species groups, which exhibit similar body sizes. Hybrids are recognized chiefly by the intermediate morphology of the copulatory pieces in male genitalia between two species. Experimental studies have revealed that discrimination of conspecific/heterospecific mates is incomplete among Ohomopterus species, leading to interspecific mating behavior; body size differences are effective for premating reproductive isolation; and differences in genital morphology are effective for prezygotic isolation by reducing the insemination rate. However, the mechanical reproductive isolation provided by the difference in genital morphology is incomplete between species of similar size, allowing hybridization despite the mismatch in genital morphology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barton NH, Hewitt GM (1985) Analysis of hybrid zones. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 16:113–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Gröning J, Hochkirch A (2008) Reproductive interference between animal species. Q Rev Biol 83:257–282. https://doi.org/10.1086/590510

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison RG (1990) Hybrid zones: windows on evolutionary process. Oxford Surv Evol Biol 7:69–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson GE (1959) Homage to Santa Rosalia or why are there so many kinds of animals? Am Nat 93:145–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imura Y, Mizusawa K (2013) The Carabus of Japan. Roppon-Ashi Entomological Books, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishikawa R (1966) Studies on some species of Japanese Carabina (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Bull Natl Sci Museum, Tokyo 9:9–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Katsura K, Tominaga O, Hiura I, Doi N, Harusawa K, Tani K (1978) Distribution of carabid beetles in the Ise-Shima region, Kinki District, with description of a new subspecies. Bull Osaka Museum Nat Hist 31:47–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubota K (1988) Natural hybridization between Carabus (Ohomopterus) maiyasanus and C. (O.) iwawakianus (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Kontyu 53:370–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubota K, Miyazaki K, Ebihara S, Takami Y (2013) Mechanical reproductive isolation via divergent genital morphology between Carabus insulicola and C. esakii with implications in species coexistence. Popul Ecol 55:35–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10144-012-0335-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuno E (1992) Competitive exclusion through reproductive interference. Res Popul Ecol (Kyoto) 34:275–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagata N, Kubota K, Yahiro K, Sota T (2007) Mechanical barriers to introgressive hybridization revealed by mitochondrial introgression patterns in Ohomopterus ground beetle assemblages. Mol Ecol 16:4822–4836. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03569.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Okuzaki Y, Takami Y, Sota T (2010) Resource partitioning or reproductive isolation: The ecological role of body size differences among closely related species in sympatry. J Anim Ecol 79:383–392. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01645.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro JMC, Spielman A (1986) The satyr effect : a model predicting parapatry and species extinction. Am Nat 128:513–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sako H (2004) Cuticular hydrocarbons and premating isolation of subgenus Ohomopterus (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Kyoto University, Kyoto

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasabe M, Takami Y, Sota T (2007) The genetic basis of interspecific differences in genital morphology of closely related carabid beetles. Heredity (Edinb) 98:385–391. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.hdy.6800952

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sasabe M, Takami Y, Sota T (2010) QTL for the species-specific male and female genital morphologies in Ohomopterus ground beetles. Mol Ecol 19:5231–5239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04883.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D, Boecklen W (1981) Santa Rosalia reconsidered: Size ratios and competition. Evolution (N Y) 35:1206–1228. https://doi.org/10.2307/2408133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sota T, Kubota K (1998) Genital lock-and-key as a selective agent against hybridization. Evolution 52:1507–1513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sota T, Kusumoto F, Kubota K (2000a) Consequences of hybridization between Ohomopterus insulicola and O. arrowianus (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in a segmented river basin: Parallel formation of hybrid swarms. Biol J Linn Soc 71:297–313. https://doi.org/10.1006/bijl.2000.0444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sota T, Takami Y, Kubota K, Ujiie M, Ishikawa R (2000b) Interspecific body size differentiation in species assemblages of the carabid subgenus Ohomopterus in Japan. Popul Ecol 42:279–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sota T, Ishikawa R, Ujiie M, Kusumoto F, Vogler AP (2001) Extensive trans-species mitochondrial polymorphisms in the carabid beetles Carabus subgenus Ohomopterus caused by repeated introgressive hybridization. Mol Ecol 10:2833–2847. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294X.2001.t01-1-01404.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Takami Y, Suzuki H (2005) Morphological, genetic and behavioural analyses of a hybrid zone between the ground beetles. Biol J Linn Soc 86:79–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takami Y, Nagata N, Sasabe M, Sota T (2007) Asymmetry in reproductive isolation and its effect on directional mitochondrial introgression in the parapatric ground beetles Carabus yamato and C. albrechti. Popul Ecol 49:337–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10144-007-0052-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ujiie M, Kubota K, Sota T, Ishikawa R (2005) Parallel formation of hybrid swarms of ground beetles in the genus Carabus (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in adjacent river basins. Entomol Sci 8:429–437. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-8298.2005.00142.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Usami T, Yokoyama J, Kubota K, Kawata M (2006) Genital lock-and-key system and premating isolation by mate preference in carabid beetles (Carabus subgenus Ohomopterus). Biol J Linn Soc 87:145–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2006.00562.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshimura J, Clark CW (1994) Population dynamics of sexual and resource competition. Theor Popul Biol 45:121–131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Teiji Sota .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sota, T. (2022). Natural Hybridization and Reproductive Isolation. In: Evolutionary Biology of Carabus Ground Beetles. Entomology Monographs. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6699-5_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics