Abstract
In this chapter, cases of natural hybridization between Ohomopterus species are reviewed, and the mechanisms of reproductive isolation are considered. Hybrid zones are found between parapatric species within species groups, which exhibit similar body sizes. Hybrids are recognized chiefly by the intermediate morphology of the copulatory pieces in male genitalia between two species. Experimental studies have revealed that discrimination of conspecific/heterospecific mates is incomplete among Ohomopterus species, leading to interspecific mating behavior; body size differences are effective for premating reproductive isolation; and differences in genital morphology are effective for prezygotic isolation by reducing the insemination rate. However, the mechanical reproductive isolation provided by the difference in genital morphology is incomplete between species of similar size, allowing hybridization despite the mismatch in genital morphology.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barton NH, Hewitt GM (1985) Analysis of hybrid zones. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 16:113–148
Gröning J, Hochkirch A (2008) Reproductive interference between animal species. Q Rev Biol 83:257–282. https://doi.org/10.1086/590510
Harrison RG (1990) Hybrid zones: windows on evolutionary process. Oxford Surv Evol Biol 7:69–128
Hutchinson GE (1959) Homage to Santa Rosalia or why are there so many kinds of animals? Am Nat 93:145–159
Imura Y, Mizusawa K (2013) The Carabus of Japan. Roppon-Ashi Entomological Books, Tokyo
Ishikawa R (1966) Studies on some species of Japanese Carabina (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Bull Natl Sci Museum, Tokyo 9:9–26
Katsura K, Tominaga O, Hiura I, Doi N, Harusawa K, Tani K (1978) Distribution of carabid beetles in the Ise-Shima region, Kinki District, with description of a new subspecies. Bull Osaka Museum Nat Hist 31:47–60
Kubota K (1988) Natural hybridization between Carabus (Ohomopterus) maiyasanus and C. (O.) iwawakianus (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Kontyu 53:370–380
Kubota K, Miyazaki K, Ebihara S, Takami Y (2013) Mechanical reproductive isolation via divergent genital morphology between Carabus insulicola and C. esakii with implications in species coexistence. Popul Ecol 55:35–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10144-012-0335-4
Kuno E (1992) Competitive exclusion through reproductive interference. Res Popul Ecol (Kyoto) 34:275–284
Nagata N, Kubota K, Yahiro K, Sota T (2007) Mechanical barriers to introgressive hybridization revealed by mitochondrial introgression patterns in Ohomopterus ground beetle assemblages. Mol Ecol 16:4822–4836. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03569.x
Okuzaki Y, Takami Y, Sota T (2010) Resource partitioning or reproductive isolation: The ecological role of body size differences among closely related species in sympatry. J Anim Ecol 79:383–392. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01645.x
Ribeiro JMC, Spielman A (1986) The satyr effect : a model predicting parapatry and species extinction. Am Nat 128:513–528
Sako H (2004) Cuticular hydrocarbons and premating isolation of subgenus Ohomopterus (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Kyoto University, Kyoto
Sasabe M, Takami Y, Sota T (2007) The genetic basis of interspecific differences in genital morphology of closely related carabid beetles. Heredity (Edinb) 98:385–391. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.hdy.6800952
Sasabe M, Takami Y, Sota T (2010) QTL for the species-specific male and female genital morphologies in Ohomopterus ground beetles. Mol Ecol 19:5231–5239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04883.x
Simberloff D, Boecklen W (1981) Santa Rosalia reconsidered: Size ratios and competition. Evolution (N Y) 35:1206–1228. https://doi.org/10.2307/2408133
Sota T, Kubota K (1998) Genital lock-and-key as a selective agent against hybridization. Evolution 52:1507–1513
Sota T, Kusumoto F, Kubota K (2000a) Consequences of hybridization between Ohomopterus insulicola and O. arrowianus (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in a segmented river basin: Parallel formation of hybrid swarms. Biol J Linn Soc 71:297–313. https://doi.org/10.1006/bijl.2000.0444
Sota T, Takami Y, Kubota K, Ujiie M, Ishikawa R (2000b) Interspecific body size differentiation in species assemblages of the carabid subgenus Ohomopterus in Japan. Popul Ecol 42:279–291
Sota T, Ishikawa R, Ujiie M, Kusumoto F, Vogler AP (2001) Extensive trans-species mitochondrial polymorphisms in the carabid beetles Carabus subgenus Ohomopterus caused by repeated introgressive hybridization. Mol Ecol 10:2833–2847. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294X.2001.t01-1-01404.x
Takami Y, Suzuki H (2005) Morphological, genetic and behavioural analyses of a hybrid zone between the ground beetles. Biol J Linn Soc 86:79–94
Takami Y, Nagata N, Sasabe M, Sota T (2007) Asymmetry in reproductive isolation and its effect on directional mitochondrial introgression in the parapatric ground beetles Carabus yamato and C. albrechti. Popul Ecol 49:337–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10144-007-0052-6
Ujiie M, Kubota K, Sota T, Ishikawa R (2005) Parallel formation of hybrid swarms of ground beetles in the genus Carabus (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in adjacent river basins. Entomol Sci 8:429–437. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-8298.2005.00142.x
Usami T, Yokoyama J, Kubota K, Kawata M (2006) Genital lock-and-key system and premating isolation by mate preference in carabid beetles (Carabus subgenus Ohomopterus). Biol J Linn Soc 87:145–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2006.00562.x
Yoshimura J, Clark CW (1994) Population dynamics of sexual and resource competition. Theor Popul Biol 45:121–131
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sota, T. (2022). Natural Hybridization and Reproductive Isolation. In: Evolutionary Biology of Carabus Ground Beetles. Entomology Monographs. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6699-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6699-5_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-6698-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-6699-5
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)