Skip to main content

Machine Learning-Based Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Monolayered Graphene

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Recent Advances in Computational and Experimental Mechanics, Vol II

Abstract

The characterization of nano-scale materials in the lab setting requires a huge cost, precision and time. The molecular simulations rule out the cost and precision but still these simulations are computationally expensive and intensive. In this regard, we present a support vector machine (SVM)-based molecular dynamics simulation of monolayer graphene to predict its temperature and strain rate-dependent fracture strength. The design of experiments algorithm for full factorial design with six levels of variation in both input settings (temperature and strain rate) is used to create the sample space for training the machine learning model. The prediction capability of machine learning model is further tested by utilizing separate samples generated with SOBOL sequence sampling technique. The accuracy of prediction is assessed by observing correlation coefficient (R2) and error analysis (probability density function (PDF) plots). To construct the model, temperature and strain rate are used as the input features and the desired response quantity is fracture strength of graphene.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lee C, Wei X, Kysar JW, Hone J (2008) “Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene”, science, vol 321(5887), pp 385–388

    Google Scholar 

  2. Thomas S, Ajith KM (2014) Molecular dynamics simulation of the thermo-mechanical properties of monolayer graphene sheet. Procedia Materials Science. 5:489–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ansari R, Ajori S, Motevalli B (2012) Mechanical properties of defective single-layered graphene sheets via molecular dynamics simulation. Superlattices Microstruct 51(2):274–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Agius Anastasi A, Ritos K, Cassar G, Borg MK (2016) “Mechanical properties of pristine and nanoporous graphene”, Molecular Simulation, vol 42(18), pp 1502–1511

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gupta KK, Roy A, Dey S (2020) “Comparative Study of Various Defects in Monolayer Graphene Using Molecular Dynamics Simulation”, in Advances in Applied Mechanical Engineering, Springer, Singapore, pp 539–546

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tsai JL, Tu JF (2010) Characterizing mechanical properties of graphite using molecular dynamics simulation. Mater Des 31(1):194–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gupta KK, Dey S (2019) “Effect of Temperature on the Fracture Strength of Perfect and Defective MonoLayered Graphene”, in Advances in Computational Methods in Manufacturing, Springer, Singapore, pp 793–804

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dewapriya MAN, Rajapakse RKND (2014) “Molecular dynamics simulations and continuum modeling of temperature and strain rate dependent fracture strength of graphene with vacancy defects”, J Appl Mech, vol 81(8)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang YY, Gu Y (2013) Mechanical properties of graphene: Effects of layer number, temperature and isotope. Comput Mater Sci 71:197–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gupta KK, Mukhopadhyay T, Roy A, Dey S (2020) “Probing the compound effect of spatially varying intrinsic defects and doping on mechanical properties of hybrid graphene monolayers”, J Mater Sci Technol

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rajasekaran G, Parashar A (2018) Effect of topological defects on mechanical properties of graphene sheets: a molecular dynamics study. Materials Today: Proceedings. 5(2):6780–6788

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mukhopadhyay T, Mahata A, Dey S, Adhikari S (2016) Probabilistic analysis and design of HCP nanowires: an efficient surrogate based molecular dynamics simulation approach. J Mater Sci Technol 32(12):1345–1351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dewapriya MAN, Rajapakse RKND, Dias WPS (2020) “Characterizing fracture stress of defective graphene samples using shallow and deep artificial neural networks”, Carbon

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang Z, Hong Y, Hou B, Zhang Z, Negahban M, Zhang J (2019) Accelerated discoveries of mechanical properties of graphene using machine learning and high-throughput computation. Carbon 148:115–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang X, Han D, Hong Y, Sun H, Zhang J, Zhang J (2019) Machine learning enabled prediction of mechanical properties of tungsten disulfide monolayer. ACS Omega 4(6):10121–10128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yang H, Zhang Z, Zhang J, Zeng XC (2018) Machine learning and artificial neural network prediction of interfacial thermal resistance between graphene and hexagonal boron nitride. Nanoscale 10(40):19092–19099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Garg A, Vijayaraghavan V, Wong CH, Tai K, Gao L (2014) An embedded simulation approach for modeling the thermal conductivity of 2D nanoscale material. Simul Model Pract Theory 44:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Vijayaraghavan V, Garg A, Wong CH, Tai K, Singru PM (2015) An integrated computational approach for determining the elastic properties of boron nitride nanotubes. Int J Mech Mater Des 11(1):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Garg A, Tai K (2014) Stepwise approach for the evolution of generalized genetic programming model in prediction of surface finish of the turning process. Adv Eng Softw 78:16–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Garg A, Vijayaraghavan V, Lam JSL, Singru PM, Gao L (2015) A molecular simulation based computational intelligence study of a nano-machining process with implications on its environmental performance. Swarm Evol Comput 21:54–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. MATLAB 2018a, The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, Massachusetts, United States.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Trafalis TB, Ince H (2000) “Support vector machine for regression and applications to financial forecasting”. In Proceedings of the IEEE-INNS-ENNS International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. IJCNN 2000. Neural Computing: New Challenges and Perspectives for the New Millennium, IEEE, vol. 6, pp 348–353

    Google Scholar 

  23. Saunders LJ, Russell RA, Crabb DP (2012) The coefficient of determination: what determines a useful R2 statistic? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53(11):6830–6832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Plimpton S (1993) “Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics”, Sandia National Labs., Albuquerque, NM (United States), No. SAND-91–1144

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tersoff J (1988) New empirical approach for the structure and energy of covalent systems. Phys Rev B 37(12):6991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K (1996) VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graph 14(1):33–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lindsay L, Broido DA (2010) “Optimized Tersoff and Brenner empirical potential parameters for lattice dynamics and phonon thermal transport in carbon nanotubes and graphene”, Physical Review B,vol 81(20), pp 205441

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mortazavi B, Fan Z, Pereira LFC, Harju A, Rabczuk T (2016) Amorphized graphene: a stiff material with low thermal conductivity. Carbon 103:318–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rajasekaran G, Kumar R, Parashar A (2016) “Tersoff potential with improved accuracy for simulating graphene in molecular dynamics environment”, Materials Research Express, vol 3(3), pp 035011

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wang MC, Yan C, Ma L, Hu N, Chen MW (2012) Effect of defects on fracture strength of graphene sheets. Comput Mater Sci 54:236–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

KKG is glad to acknowledge the financial support provided by Ministry of Education (MoE), Govt. of India during conducting the present study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kritesh Kumar Gupta .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gupta, K.K., Roy, L., Dey, S. (2022). Machine Learning-Based Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Monolayered Graphene. In: Maiti, D.K., et al. Recent Advances in Computational and Experimental Mechanics, Vol II. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6490-8_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6490-8_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-6489-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-6490-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics