Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The BRI and Its Economic Corridors: Opportunities for Development

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Belt and Road Initiative in South–South Cooperation

Abstract

This chapter mainly reviews the development panorama of the BRI and its six economic corridors: The China–Mongolia–Russia Economic Corridor (CMREC, the New Eurasian Land Bridge (NELB), the China–Central Asia–West Asia Economic Corridor (CCWAEC, the China–Indochina Peninsula Economic Corridor (CIPEC), the China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC and the Bangladesh–Chinese–India–Myanmar Economic Corridor (BCIMEC).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Sheng, L. (2010) Growth-volatility tradeoff in the face of financial openness: A perspective of developing economies. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 23(4), 609–622.

  2. 2.

    Chang, H. J., & Andreoni, A. (2020). Industrial policy in the twenty-first century. Development and Change, 51(2), 324–351.

  3. 3.

    Gu, X., & Sheng, L. (2010) A sensible policy tool for Pareto improvement: Capital controls. Journal of World Trade, 44(3), 567–590.

  4. 4.

    Sheng, L. (2012) Dealing with financial risks of international capital flows: A theoretical framework. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 25(3), 463–474.

  5. 5.

    Hudson, M. (2020). Cold War 2.0. The Geopolitical Economics of Finance Capitalism vs. Industrial Capitalism. ISLET. http://arielumpierrez.com/635-2/.

  6. 6.

    Sheng, L. (2014). Capital controls and international development: A theoretical reconsideration. Global Policy, 5(1), 114–120.

  7. 7.

    Sheng, L. (2016). Explaining US–China economic imbalances: A social perspective. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 29(3), 1097–1111.

  8. 8.

    Chen, Y., Fan, Z., Zhang, J., & Mo, M. (2019). Does the connectivity of the Belt and Road Initiative contribute to the economic growth of the Belt and Road countries? Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 55(14), 3227–3240.

  9. 9.

    García-Herrero, A., & Xu, J. (2019, February 6). Countries’ perceptions of China’s Belt and Road Initiative: A big data analysis (Bruegel Working Paper Issue 01).

  10. 10.

    Derudder, B., Liu, X., & Kunaka, C. (2018). Connectivity along overland corridors of the Belt and Road Initiative. World Bank.

  11. 11.

    Ibid.

  12. 12.

    The State of Council Information Office of the PRC. (2020). What are six economic corridors under Belt and Road Initiative? http://english.scio.gov.cn/beltandroad/2020-08/04/content_76345602.htm#:~:text=These%20include%20the%20Chongqing%2DXinjiang,progressing%20in%20a%20steady%20manner.

  13. 13.

    Ibid.

  14. 14.

    Internal Document for Silk Road Forum. (2015). http://en.drc.gov.cn/YangChenhua.pdf.

  15. 15.

    Peter, B. (2016, June 28). China, Russia, Mongolia Sign Long-Awaited Economic Partnership Agreement. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2016/06/china-russia-%20mongolia-sign-long-awaited-economic-partnership-agreement/.

  16. 16.

    Soni, S. K. (2018). China–Mongolia–Russia economic corridor: Opportunities and challenges. China's Global Rebalancing and the New Silk Road, 101–117.

  17. 17.

    Please see World Bank Open Data. https://data.worldbank.org/.

  18. 18.

    Idem.

  19. 19.

    Please see the data from The World Integrated Trade Solution (WITS). https://wits.worldbank.org/.

  20. 20.

    The State of Council Information Office of the PRC. (2020). What are six economic corridors under Belt and Road Initiative? http://english.scio.gov.cn/beltandroad/2020-08/04/content_76345602.htm#:~:text=These%20include%20the%20Chongqing%2DXinjiang,progressing%20in%20a%20steady%20manner.

  21. 21.

    Mannan, A. (2014, November 7). PM to Sign 27 Energy, Development related MOUs, Agreements during China Visit. Express Tribune. https://tribune.com.pk/story/787063/pm-to-sign-27-energy-development-related-mous-agreements-during-china-visit.

  22. 22.

    Korybko, A. (2017). CPEC and the twenty-first-century convergence of civilizations. https://www.geopolitica.ru/en/article/cpec-and-21st-century-convergence-civilizations.

  23. 23.

    Idem; Korybko, A. (2021, March 22). What is Pakistan’s multipolar grand strategy? The Express Tribune. https://tribune.com.pk/article/97335/what-is-pakistans-multipolar-grand-strategy.

  24. 24.

    Hussain, M., & Jamali, A. B. (2019). Geopolitical dynamics of the China–Pakistan economic corridor: A new great game in South Asia. Chinese Political Science Review, 4(3), 303–326.

  25. 25.

    Akram, M. (2016, June 12). The new great game. Dawn News. https://www.dawn.com/news/1264242.

  26. 26.

    Mahmood, M. (2016). China–Pakistan economic corridor—The geo-strategic dimension and challenges. CISS Insight: Quarterly News & Views.

  27. 27.

    Paul, P. J., & Aditi. (2016, May 26). China–Pakistan Economic Corridor: Should India Worry? South Asia Monitor. http://southasiamonitor.org/news/China-pakistan-economic-corridor-should-india-worry-/sl/17232.

  28. 28.

    Deepak, B. R. (2018). Bangladesh, China, India, Myanmar Economic Corridor (BCIM-EC): Security Dilemma Rider to Regional Economic Integration. In China's Global Rebalancing and the New Silk Road (pp. 51–68). Springer.

  29. 29.

    Uberoi, P. (2013). The BCIM forum: Retrospect and prospect (Delhi: ICS Working Paper, 1).

  30. 30.

    The State of Council Information Office of the PRC. (2020). What are six economic corridors under Belt and Road Initiative? http://english.scio.gov.cn/beltandroad/2020-08/04/content_76345602.htm#:~:text=These%20include%20the%20Chongqing%2DXinjiang,progressing%20in%20a%20steady%20manner.

  31. 31.

    Ibid.

  32. 32.

    Sachdeva, G. (2018). Indian perceptions of the Chinese Belt and Road initiative. International Studies, 55(4), 285–296.

  33. 33.

    DD News. (2021, June). Bangladesh to grow at 1.6 percent in 2020–21—World Bank. http://ddnews.gov.in/international/bangladesh-grow-16-percent-2020-21-world-bank.

  34. 34.

    Saimum, R. (2020). The prospect of Belt And Road Initiative in the context of Bangladesh. China Report, 56(4), 464–483.

  35. 35.

    Humayun Kabir, M., & Ahmad, A. (2015). The Bay of Bengal: Next theater for strategic power play in Asia. Croatian International Relations Review, 21(72), 199–238.

  36. 36.

    Xinhua. (2021, May). China announces to donate 2nd batch of COVID-19 vaccines to Bangladesh. http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2021-05/22/c_139961865.htm.

  37. 37.

    Deepak, B. R. (2018). Bangladesh, China, India, Myanmar Economic Corridor (BCIM-EC): Security Dilemma Rider to Regional Economic Integration. In China's Global Rebalancing and the New Silk Road (pp. 51–68). Springer.

  38. 38.

    Mohan Malik, J. (2018). Myanmar’s role in China’s Maritime Silk Road initiative. Journal of Contemporary China, 27(111), 362–378.

  39. 39.

    Soong, J. J., & Aung, K. H. (2021). Myanmar’s perception and strategy toward China’s BRI expansion on three major projects development: Hedging strategic framework with state-market-society analysis. The Chinese Economy, 54(1), 20–34.

  40. 40.

    Jinbo, W. (2019). The China–Indochina Peninsula Economic Corridor. In Routledge handbook of the belt and road (pp. 213–217). Routledge.

  41. 41.

    Zhu, L., & Zhu, J. (2016, November). The study on the international production capacity cooperation of the China–Indochina Peninsula economic corridor. In 2016 1st International Symposium on Business Cooperation and Development (pp. 187–191). Atlantis Press.

  42. 42.

    Hiep, L. H. (2018). The Belt and Road Initiative in Vietnam: Challenges and Prospects. © ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute. http://hdl.handle.net/11540/8138.

  43. 43.

    Global Infrastructure Hub. (2017, July). Global Infrastructure Outlook—Infrastructure investment needs—50 countries, 7 sectors to 2040, from https://d2rpq8wtqka5kg.cloudfront.net/389138/open20170919030300.pdf.

  44. 44.

    Hiep, L. H. (2018). The Belt and Road Initiative in Vietnam: Challenges and Prospects. © ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute. http://hdl.handle.net/11540/8138.

  45. 45.

    Rakhimov, M. (2018). Contemporary Central Asia: Balancing Between Chinese and Trans-Asian “Silk Road” Diplomacy. In China's Global Rebalancing and the New Silk Road (pp. 119–128). Springer.

  46. 46.

    Pomfret, R. (2019). The Eurasian Landbridge and China's Belt and Road Initiative: Demand, supply of services and public policy. The World Economy, 42(6), 1642–1653.

  47. 47.

    Zogg, B. (2019). Kazakhstan: A Centrepiece in China’s Belt and Road. CSS Analyses in Security Policy, 249.

  48. 48.

    Ibid.

  49. 49.

    Rudenko, Y. I. (2013) Geopolitical and geo-economic relations of Central And South Asia: Obstacles, strategies, connectivities. Journal of Indian Ocean Studies, 21(3).

  50. 50.

    Roy-Chaudhury, S. (2020). China–Iran Relations and China’s Growing Presence in the West Asia. Centre for Air Power Studies. http://www.capsindia.org/files/documents/d5ed527a-26bf-4b96-951b-60f958bc2907.pdf.

  51. 51.

    Qiblawi, T. (2019, July 17). Muslim nations are defending China as it cracks down on Muslims, shattering any myths of Islamic solidarity. CNN. https://edition.cnn.com/2019/07/17/asia/uyghurs-%20muslim-countries-china-intl/index.htm.

  52. 52.

    Yildiran, M. (2019). The Chinese vision of BRI and its effects on Turkey and West Asia. In China’s Belt and Road Initiative in a Global Context (pp. 211–234). Palgrave Macmillan.

  53. 53.

    Please see Roy-Chaudhury, S. (2020). China–Iran Relations and China’s Growing Presence in the West Asia. Centre for Air Power Studies. http://www.capsindia.org/files/documents/d5ed527a-26bf-4b96-951b-60f958bc2907.pdf; Huang, K. (2020, January). China and Iran: A special relationship built on trade, weapons, and oil. South China Morning Post. https://www.scmp.com/news/china/military/article/3045253/china-and-iran-relationship-built-trade-weapons-and-oil.

  54. 54.

    Sun, Z. Z. (2021). Duobian Kuangjianei de Zhonge Zhanlue Xiezuo: Wenti yu Qianjing [Strategic cooperation between China and Russia within multilateral framework: Problems and prospects]. Dongbeiya Luntan, No. 3 [Northeast Asia Forum, No. 3].

  55. 55.

    Xinhua. (2019, June). China, Russia agree to upgrade relations for new era. http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2019-06/06/c_138119879_2.htm.

  56. 56.

    Xinhua. (2021, January). Full text of interview given by Chinese FM Wang Yi on international situation, China's diplomacy in 2020. http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2021-01/02/c_139636373.htm.

  57. 57.

    Nye, J. (2015, January 12). A New Sino–Russian Alliance? Project Syndicate. https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/russia-china-alliance-by-joseph-s--nye-2015-01.

  58. 58.

    Trofimov, Y. (2019, February 2). The New Beijing–Moscow Axis. Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-new-beijing-moscow-axis-11549036661.

  59. 59.

    Sheng, L., & do Nascimento, D. F. (2021). Love and trade war: China and the U.S. in historical context. Palgrave Macmillan.

  60. 60.

    Sheng, L. (2015) Economic structure, cost outsourcing, and global imbalances. Journal of Australian Political Economy, 74, 81–94.

  61. 61.

    Gabuev, A. (2020, December 2). Is Putin Really Considering a Military Alliance with China? The Moscow Times. https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2020/12/02/is-putin-really-considering-a-military-alliance-with-china-a72207.

  62. 62.

    Ibid.

  63. 63.

    Yunling, Z. (2016). China and its neighborhood: Transformation, challenges, and grand strategy. International Affairs, 92(4), 835–848.

  64. 64.

    Jun, A. (2017, September 2). One Belt One Road can bring China and Russia closer together. Global Times. https://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1032278.shtml.

  65. 65.

    Ibid.

  66. 66.

    Ibid.

  67. 67.

    Tass. (2018, June 6). Russia’s President Comments on One Belt, One Road Concept’s Prospects. Russian News Agency. https://tass.com/economy/1008158.

  68. 68.

    Cheng, K. (2019, April 26). Handshake of the iron fists: China and Russia cozy up to one another during the Belt and Road Summit in Beijing as US snubs the event. Mail Online and AFP.

  69. 69.

    Makarov, I., & Sokolova, A. (2016). Coordination of the Eurasian Economic Union and the Silk Road Economic Belt: Opportunities for Russia. International Organizations Research Journal, 11(2), 29–42.

  70. 70.

    Chubarov, I. (2019). Challenges and opportunities for the spatial development of Eurasia under the BRI: The case of the Eurasian Economic Union. Area Development and Policy, 4(1), 81–97.

  71. 71.

    Sun, Z. Z. (2021). Duobian Kuangjianei de Zhonge Zhanlue Xiezuo: Wenti yu Qianjing [Strategic cooperation between China and Russia within multilateral framework: Problems and prospects]. Dongbeiya Luntan, No. 3 [Northeast Asia Forum, No. 3].

  72. 72.

    Fattibene, D. (2015). Russia’s pivot to Asia: Myths and realities. Instituto Affari Internazionali (IAI).

  73. 73.

    Makarov, I., & Sokolova, A. (2016). Coordination of the Eurasian Economic Union and the Silk Road Economic Belt: Opportunities for Russia. International Organizations Research Journal, 11(2), 29–42.

  74. 74.

    Kyzy, A. U. (2018, August 8). Is the new “Great Game” a China–Russia duel over Central Asia? TRT World. https://www.trtworld.com/opinion/is-the-new-great-game-a-china-russia-duel-over-central-asia--19452.

  75. 75.

    Makarov, I., & Sokolova, A. (2016). Coordination of the Eurasian Economic Union and the Silk Road Economic Belt: Opportunities for Russia. International Organizations Research Journal, 11(2), 29–42.

  76. 76.

    European Commission. (2020, December 30). EU and China reach agreement in principle on investment. European Commission. Press release. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_20_2541.

  77. 77.

    Kowalski, B. (2017). China’s foreign policy toward Central and Eastern Europe: The “16 + 1” format in the South–South cooperation perspective. Cases of the Czech Republic and Hungary. Cambridge Journal of Eurasian Studies, 1(1), 1–16.

  78. 78.

    The data are collected from Cooperation between China and Central and Eastern European Countries. http://www.China-ceec.org/eng/.

  79. 79.

    CGTN. (2021, February). China secured bumper trade results with CEE countries in 2020. https://news.cgtn.com/news/2021-02-04/China-considers-joining-CPTPP-XBFghDb1nO/index.html#:~:text=China's%20foreign%20trade%20with%20the,time%2C%20official%20data%20showed%20Thursday.

  80. 80.

    Yu, J. (2018). The Belt and Road Initiative: Domestic interests, bureaucratic politics, and EU–China relations. Asia Europe Journal, 16(3), 223–236.

  81. 81.

    Tiejun, Z. (2016). Sino–European relations: From the height to the width. In The role of the European Union in Asia (pp. 141–158). Routledge.

  82. 82.

    Jakimów, M. (2019). Desecuritization as a soft power strategy: The Belt and Road Initiative, European fragmentation, and China’s normative influence in Central-Eastern Europe. Asia Europe Journal, 17(4), 369–385.

  83. 83.

    Ghiasy, R., & Zhou, J. (2017). The silk road economic belt: Considering security implications and EU–China cooperation prospects. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.

  84. 84.

    Varoufakis, Y. (2016). Creditors uninterested in getting their money back: Dissolving the Eurozone paradox. Journal of Australian Political Economy (77), 23–35.

  85. 85.

    Idem; Guzman, M., Ocampo, J. A., & Stiglitz, J. E. (Eds.). (2016). Too Little, Too Late: The quest to resolve sovereign debt crises. Columbia University Press.

  86. 86.

    The data are collected from Eurostat. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database.

  87. 87.

    Council of EU. (2013, October 18). Council approves launch of investment talks with China. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/EN/foraff/139055.pdf.

  88. 88.

    European Commission. (2016, June). Joint Communication to the European Parliament and the Council: Elements for a new EU strategy on China. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/c3aa6b64-3919-11e6-a825-01aa75ed71a1.

  89. 89.

    European Court of Auditors. (2020). The EU’s response to China’s state-driven investment strategy. https://www.eca.europa.eu/Lists/ECADocuments/RW20_03/RW_EU_response_to_China_EN.pdf.

  90. 90.

    World Bank. (2019). Belt and Road Economics: Opportunities and risks of transport corridors. The World Bank.

  91. 91.

    Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2018). Belt and Road Initiative in the global trade, investment, and finance landscape. In OECD Business and Finance Outlook 2018. OECD Publishing.

  92. 92.

    Please see Council of the EU. (2020, September 14). EU–China leaders’ meeting via video conference. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/meetings/international-summit/2020/09/14/.

  93. 93.

    Emmott, R. (2021, March 22). EU, China impose tit-for-tat sanctions over Xinjiang abuses. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-eu-china-sanctions-idUSKBN2BE1AI.

  94. 94.

    Holzer, C. (2020). Identity narratives in China and the EU’s economic diplomacy: Comparing the BRI and the EU connectivity strategy for Asia. In Chinese National Identity in the Age of Globalization (pp. 183–202). Palgrave Macmillan.

  95. 95.

    Peel, M. (2019, September 27). Japan and EU Sign Deal in Riposte to China’s Belt and Road. Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/dd14ce1e-e11d-11e9-9743-db5a370481bc.

  96. 96.

    European Commission. (2019, March 12). EU–China: A strategic outlook. Strasbourg. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/communication-eu-china-a-strategic-outlook.pdf.

  97. 97.

    Idem.

  98. 98.

    Idem.

  99. 99.

    European Parliament. (2018, September). China, the 16 + 1 format and the EU. http://www.iberchina.org/files/2018-2/161_china_eu_parl.pdf.

  100. 100.

    Oehler-Şincai, I. M. (2018). The 16 + 1 Process: Correlations between the EU Dependence. Attitude Matrix and the Cooperation Intensity with China.

  101. 101.

    Gruebler, J., & Stehrer, R. (2020). Economic (policy) implications of the Belt and Road Initiative for Central, East, and Southeast Europe. In China’s Belt and Road Initiative (pp. 212–228). Routledge.

  102. 102.

    Ibid.

  103. 103.

    Jian, J. (2018). China in Central Asia and the Balkans: Challenges from a geopolitical perspective. In The Belt & Road Initiative in the global arena (pp. 241–261). Palgrave Macmillan.

  104. 104.

    Garlick, J. (2019). The impact of China’s Belt and Road Initiative: From Asia to Europe. Routledge.

  105. 105.

    Huang, K. (2018, September 23). Why China buying up ports is worrying Europe. South China Morning Post. https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/2165341/why-china-buying-ports-worrying-europe.

  106. 106.

    Norris, W. J. (2016). Chinese economic statecraft: Commercial actors, grand strategy, and state control. Cornell University Press.

  107. 107.

    BBC. (2021, March). Suez Canal: Fresh effort to refloat wedged container ship. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-56550350.

  108. 108.

    Paulo, M. (2018). China–Europe investment cooperation: A digital silk road. In The Belt & Road Initiative in the Global Arena (pp. 177–204). Palgrave Macmillan.

  109. 109.

    BBC. (2020, November). Huawei ban: UK to impose early end to use of new 5G kit. https://www.bbc.com/news/business-55124236.

  110. 110.

    Seely, B., Varnish, P., & Hemmings, J. (2019, May). Defending our data: Huawei, 5G and the Five Eyes. Asia Studies Center, Henry Jackson Society.

  111. 111.

    European Parliament. (2019, April). 5G in the EU and Chinese telecoms suppliers. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/ATAG/2019/637912/EPRS_ATA(2019)637912_EN.pdf.

  112. 112.

    Oxford Economics. (2020, November). The economic impact of Huawei in Europe. https://www.oxfordeconomics.com/recent-releases/The-economic-impact-of-Huawei-in-Europe.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Macau, Macao, China

    Li Sheng

  2. Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Macau, Macao, China

    Dmitri Felix do Nascimento

Authors
  1. Li Sheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dmitri Felix do Nascimento
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Li Sheng .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sheng, L., Nascimento, D.F.d. (2021). The BRI and Its Economic Corridors: Opportunities for Development. In: The Belt and Road Initiative in South–South Cooperation. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6357-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6357-4_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-6356-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-6357-4

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation