Skip to main content

A Multi-objective Particle Swarm Optimisation-Based Solution Approach for Multiple Mean-Responses Optimisation Considering Empirical Model Uncertainties

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Studies in Quantitative Decision Making

Part of the book series: Asset Analytics ((ASAN))

  • 313 Accesses

Abstract

Simultaneous optimisation of multiple quality characteristics or responses is so-called multiple response optimisation (MRO) problem. As the responses are often correlated, trade-off solutions are inevitable for multiple response optimisation problem. Thus, multiple efficient or nondominated solutions are sought for a specific multiple response optimisation problem. In addition, solution quality of a multiple response optimisation problem also depends on the accuracy of empirical models or response surface (RS) models. Higher the response surface model accuracy, better is the solution quality. However, point estimate prediction from an empirical response surface model will always have inherent uncertainties. Two such prominent uncertainties are attributed to model parameters and response uncertainties. Thus, obtaining an implementable best process setting condition is always a challenging task for researchers. Researchers suggested various solution approaches to derive improved and efficient solutions in the context of multiple response optimisation. To further contribute to this field of study, this chapter proposes a multi-objective particle swarm optimisation-based solution approach for mean-responses optimisation, considering the above-mentioned uncertainties. To assist the decision-maker (DM), a ranking strategy is suggested based on two multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques. Step-wise implementation of the proposed approach is illustrated using varied mean-response multiple response optimisation cases. Implementation results are also contrasted with existing best-reported solutions (derived using various approaches). Comparative results indicate that the proposed approach can derive the best efficient solutions with higher nondominated frequency and mean responses closer to target values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bera, S., & Mukherjee, I. (2018a). A solution framework for response surface-based multiple quality characteristics optimization. International Journal of Reliability, Qualitive and Safety Engineering, 25(05), 1850025-1–1850025-27

    Google Scholar 

  • Bera, S., & Mukherjee, I. (2018b). Advances in solution methods for optimisation of multiple quality characteristics in manufacturing processes. International Journal of Productve and Qualitive Management, 24(4), 475–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, J. L., Lu, L., & Anderson-Cook, C. M. (2014a). Process optimization for multiple responses utilizing the Pareto front approach. Quality Engineering, 26(3), 253–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, J. L., Lu, L., & Anderson-Cook, C. M. (2014b). Incorporating response variability and estimation uncertainty into Pareto front optimization. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 76, 253–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coello, C. A. C., Lamont, G. B., & Van Veldhuizen, D. A. (2007). Evolutionary algorithms for solving multi-objective problems, 2nd edn. Springer Science & Business Media

    Google Scholar 

  • Coello, C. A. C., Pulido, G. T., & Lechuga, M. S. (2004). Handling multiple objectives with particle swarm optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 8(3), 256–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, N. R., Lourenço, J., & Pereira, Z. L. (2012). Multiresponse optimization and pareto frontiers. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 28(7), 701–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, N., & Lourenço, J. (2017). Reproducibility of nondominated solutions. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 168, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Castillo, E., Fan, S. K., & Semple, J. (1999). Optimization of dual response systems: A comprehensive procedure for degenerate and nondegenerate problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 112(1), 174–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derringer, G., & Suich, R. (1980). Simultaneous optimization of several response variables. Journal of Quality Technology, 12(4), 214–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, Z., Zhu, P. F., & Park, S. H. (2012). A robust desirability function method for multi-response surface optimization considering model uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research, 221(1), 241–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishibuchi, H., Akedo, N., Ohyanagi, H., & Nojima, Y. (2011). Behavior of EMO algorithms on many-objective optimization problems with correlated objectives. In: 2011 IEEE Congress of Evolutionary Computation. IEEE, pp 1465–1472

    Google Scholar 

  • Khuri, A. I., & Conlon, M. (1981). Simultaneous optimization of multiple responses represented by polynomial regression functions. Technometrics, 23(4), 363–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K. J., & Lin, D. K. J. (2000). Simultaneous optimization of mechanical properties of steel by maximizing exponential desirability functions. Journal of Royal Statistical Society: Series C-Applied Statistics, 49(3), 311–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, L., Chapman, J. L., & Anderson-Cook, C. M. (2017). Multiple response optimization for higher dimensions in factors and responses. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 33(4), 727–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meeker, W. Q., Hahn, G. J., & Escobar, L. A. (2017). Statistical intervals : A guide for practitioners and researchers. Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. G. J. (1981). Simultaneous statistical inference (2nd ed.). Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, D. C. (2005). Design and analysis of experiments. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, D. C., & Peck, E. A. (1992). Introduction to linear regression analysis. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee, I., & Ray, P. K. (2006). A review of optimization techniques in metal cutting processes. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 50(1–2), 15–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouyang, L., Ma, Y., & Byun, J. H. (2015). An integrative loss function approach to multi-response optimization. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 31(2), 193–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouyang, L., Ma, Y., Byun, J. H., et al. (2016). A prediction region-based approach to model uncertainty for multi-response optimization. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 32(3), 783–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouyang, L., Ma, Y., Wang, J., & Tu, Y. (2017). A new loss function for multi-response optimization with model parameter uncertainty and implementation errors. European Journal of Operational Research, 258(2), 552–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, K. S., & Kim, K. J. (2005). Optimizing multi-response surface problems: How to use multi-objective optimization techniques. IIE Transactions, 37(6), 523–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, A. K., & Mukherjee, I. (2020). Enhanced multi-objective solution approach for multiple quality characteristics optimisation problems considering predictive uncertainties. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 37(1), 112–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tzeng, G. H., & Huang, J. J. (2011). Multi-attribute Decision Making. CRC Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Villa, C., Lozinguez, E., & Raphaël, L. (2013). Multi-objective optimization under uncertain objectives: Application to engineering design problem. International Conference on Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization (pp. 796–810). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vining, G. G. (1998). A compromise approach to multi-response optimization. Journal of Quality Technology, 30(4), 309–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., Ma, Y., Tsung, F., et al. (2019). Economic parameter design for ultra-fast laser micro-drilling process. International Journal of Production Research, 57(20), 6292–6314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, K., Lin, D. K. J., Tang, L. C., & Xie, M. (2004). Multiresponse systems optimization using a goal attainment approach. IIE Transactions, 36(5), 433–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Indrajit Mukherjee .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendix 1

Summary of relevant multiple response optimisation research in different solution categories (SCOO and MOO).

A summary of different multiple response optimisation solution categories (SCOO and MOO), proposed by researchers, and lacunas is provided in Table 14.

Table 14 A summary of multiple response optimisation research in different solution categories

Appendix 2: Pseudo-code of MOPSO

See Fig. 6.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Pseudo-code of MOPSO

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sharma, A.K., Mukherjee, I. (2022). A Multi-objective Particle Swarm Optimisation-Based Solution Approach for Multiple Mean-Responses Optimisation Considering Empirical Model Uncertainties. In: Ghosh, D., Khanra, A., Vanamalla, S.V., Hamid, F., Sengupta, R.N. (eds) Studies in Quantitative Decision Making. Asset Analytics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5820-4_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics