Abstract
The role undertaken by the court in enforcing money judgments varies in different countries. It appears that in Germany and Austria court officials shoulder considerable responsibility in identifying and locating assets of a judgment debtor so that the judgment creditor can initiate execution against those assets to satisfy the judgment. In the US, those who obtain money judgments do not receive such help from bailiffs or other court personnel. But they can use broad American discovery, including discovery from third parties, to locate the assets for themselves, gaining direct access to the information about assets and location. This paper labels the American approach a BYO approach, invoking a term used by American university students to signal in party invitations that people must bring their own liquor if they want to drink at the party. Similarly, American judgment creditors must take the initiative to locate assets subject to execution. To do that, they not only can use official discovery but also various self-help measures. Ultimately, however, US procedure does not regard the enforcement of a money judgment (as opposed to an injunction) as the court's responsibility.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Sterngold (1992).
- 2.
- 3.
Hess (2020), p. 6.
- 4.
Andrews (2019), p. 6.
- 5.
Id. See also R (Tirkey) v. Director of Legal Aid Casework [2017] EWHC 3403 [2018] 1 WLR 2112 ('No sensible interpretation of Article 6 involves a guarantee that an individual will recover the award of damages').
- 6.
See Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a) ('When a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend, and that failure is shown by affidavit or otherwise, the clerk must enter the party's default').
- 7.
See Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(1) (providing that the clerk must enter judgment when 'the plaintiff's claim is for a sum certain or a sum that can be made certain by computation').
- 8.
Dobbs (1973), p. 94.
- 9.
Zahoreky (2011), p. 33.
- 10.
Baxter State Bank v. Bernhardt, 186 F.R.D. 621 (D. Kan. 1999).
- 11.
Jerjian (2017), p. 243.
- 12.
- 13.
See Cal. Code Civ. Pro.' 580.
- 14.
Remarks of Rep. Sullivan, Chairman of the House Subcommittee on Consumer Affairs, 114 Cong. Rec. 1832 (1968).
- 15.
Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp., 395 U.S. 337 (1969).
- 16.
Fuentes v. Shevin, 407 U.S. 67 (1972).
- 17.
See Fed. R. Civ. P. 64(a) (‘At the commencement of and throughout an action, every remedy is available that, under the law of the state where the court is located, provides for seizing a person or property to secure satisfaction of the potential judgment').
- 18.
Rechberger (2020), p. 1.
- 19.
Laycock (1990), p. 691.
- 20.
See Berger (1978).
- 21.
See Buckholtz, Cooper, Gettner & Guggenheimer (1978).
- 22.
See Dobbs (1971).
- 23.
Catena v. Seidl, 343 A.2d 744 (N.J. 1975).
- 24.
International Business Machines Corp. v. United States, 493 U.S. 112 (2d Cir. 1971).
- 25.
Walker v. City of Birmingham, 388 U.S. 307 (1967).
- 26.
Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham, 394 U.S. 147 (1969).
- 27.
See Oppenheimer (1993).
- 28.
Fed. R. Civ. P. 69(a)(2): 'In aid of the judgment or execution, the judgment creditor or a successor in interest whose interest appears of record may obtain discovery from any person – including the judgment debtor – as provided in these rules or in the procedure of the state where the court is located.' For explanation, see Wright et al. (2014) sections 3011–15.
- 29.
Indeed, there is even a provision permitting enforcement of a judgment against a nonparty in unusual circumstances. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 71.
- 30.
Republic of Argentina v. NML Capital, Ltd., 134 S.Ct. 2250, 2254 (2014).
- 31.
Id. at 2256–57. It should be noted that Argentina had waived sovereign immunity more generally in connection with this dispute about bonds it had issued but failed to pay.
- 32.
28 U.S.C. section 1782(a).
- 33.
For discussion of this statute, see Wright et al. (2010) section 2005.1.
- 34.
Office Depot, Inc. v. Zuccarini, 596 F.3d 696 (9th Cir. 2010).
- 35.
See text accompanying note 1 above.
- 36.
See, e.g., Clark v. Associates Commercial Prop., 149 F.R.D. 629 (D. Kan. 1991) (suit against lender for injuries sustained in repossession of a tractor).
- 37.
15 U.S.C. sections 1692–1692(b).
- 38.
15 U.S.C. section 1692d(2).
- 39.
Silver-Greenberg (2012).
- 40.
See Silver-Greenberg (2011).
References
Andrews (2019) Developments in english civil justice: judicial proceedings and other civil processes. ZZPInt 2018:1–23
Berger (1978) Away from the courthouse and into the field: the odyssey of a special master. C Law Rev 78:707–732
Buckholtz,, Cooper, Gettner, Guggenheimer (1978) The remedial process in institutional reform litigation. C Law Rev 78:784-929
Dayen (2018) Prosecutors and judges have brought back debtors’ prison. Nation Magazine
Dobbs (1971) Contempt of court: a survey. Cornell Law Rev 56:183–284
Dobbs D (1973) Remedies, 1st edn. West Publications & Co., St. Paul
Hess (2020), The effective disclosure of the debtor's assets in enforcement proceedings, in this volume
Jerjian (2017) The debtors’ prison scheme: yet another bar in the birdcage of mass incarceration of communities of color. NYU Rev of Law & Soc Change 41:235–76
Laycock (1990) The irreparable injury rule. Harv Law Rev 103:687–771
Oppenheimer (1993) Martin Luther King, Walker v. City of Birmingham, and the letter from the Birmingham jail. UC Davis Law Rev 26:791–834
Rechberger (2020) Clarification of facts in Austrian enforcement law, in this volume
Silver-Greenberg (2012) In prosecutors, debt collectors find a partner, NY times
Silver-Greenberg (2011) Debtor arrests criticized. Wall St J
Sterngold (1992) Japan's rigged Casino, NY times
Wright C, Miller A, Marcus R (2010) 8 Federal practice & procedure, 3rd edn. Thomson Reuters, Minneapolis
Wright C, Miller A, Marcus R (2014) 12 Federal practice & procedure, 3rd edn. Thomson Reuters, Minneapolis
Zahorky (2011) In the judgment trade: law student's website helps bring in the cash. ABA J 33
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Marcus, R. (2022). America's BYO Approach to Enforcing Money Judgments. In: Deguchi, M. (eds) Effective Enforcement of Creditors’ Rights. Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, vol 91. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5609-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5609-5_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-5608-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-5609-5
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)