Skip to main content

America's BYO Approach to Enforcing Money Judgments

Comment on Rechberger and Hess

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Effective Enforcement of Creditors’ Rights

Part of the book series: Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice ((IUSGENT,volume 91))

Abstract

The role undertaken by the court in enforcing money judgments varies in different countries. It appears that in Germany and Austria court officials shoulder considerable responsibility in identifying and locating assets of a judgment debtor so that the judgment creditor can initiate execution against those assets to satisfy the judgment. In the US, those who obtain money judgments do not receive such help from bailiffs or other court personnel. But they can use broad American discovery, including discovery from third parties, to locate the assets for themselves, gaining direct access to the information about assets and location. This paper labels the American approach a BYO approach, invoking a term used by American university students to signal in party invitations that people must bring their own liquor if they want to drink at the party. Similarly, American judgment creditors must take the initiative to locate assets subject to execution. To do that, they not only can use official discovery but also various self-help measures. Ultimately, however, US procedure does not regard the enforcement of a money judgment (as opposed to an injunction) as the court's responsibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Sterngold (1992).

  2. 2.

    Rechberger (2020); Hess (2020).

  3. 3.

    Hess (2020), p. 6.

  4. 4.

    Andrews (2019), p. 6.

  5. 5.

    Id. See also R (Tirkey) v. Director of Legal Aid Casework [2017] EWHC 3403 [2018] 1 WLR 2112 ('No sensible interpretation of Article 6 involves a guarantee that an individual will recover the award of damages').

  6. 6.

    See Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a) ('When a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend, and that failure is shown by affidavit or otherwise, the clerk must enter the party's default').

  7. 7.

    See Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(1) (providing that the clerk must enter judgment when 'the plaintiff's claim is for a sum certain or a sum that can be made certain by computation').

  8. 8.

    Dobbs (1973), p. 94.

  9. 9.

    Zahoreky (2011), p. 33.

  10. 10.

    Baxter State Bank v. Bernhardt, 186 F.R.D. 621 (D. Kan. 1999).

  11. 11.

    Jerjian (2017), p. 243.

  12. 12.

    See Jerjian (2017) and Dayen (2018).

  13. 13.

    See Cal. Code Civ. Pro.' 580.

  14. 14.

    Remarks of Rep. Sullivan, Chairman of the House Subcommittee on Consumer Affairs, 114 Cong. Rec. 1832 (1968).

  15. 15.

    Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp., 395 U.S. 337 (1969).

  16. 16.

    Fuentes v. Shevin, 407 U.S. 67 (1972).

  17. 17.

    See Fed. R. Civ. P. 64(a) (‘At the commencement of and throughout an action, every remedy is available that, under the law of the state where the court is located, provides for seizing a person or property to secure satisfaction of the potential judgment').

  18. 18.

    Rechberger (2020), p. 1.

  19. 19.

    Laycock (1990), p. 691.

  20. 20.

    See Berger (1978).

  21. 21.

    See Buckholtz, Cooper, Gettner & Guggenheimer (1978).

  22. 22.

    See Dobbs (1971).

  23. 23.

    Catena v. Seidl, 343 A.2d 744 (N.J. 1975).

  24. 24.

    International Business Machines Corp. v. United States, 493 U.S. 112 (2d Cir. 1971).

  25. 25.

    Walker v. City of Birmingham, 388 U.S. 307 (1967).

  26. 26.

    Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham, 394 U.S. 147 (1969).

  27. 27.

    See Oppenheimer (1993).

  28. 28.

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 69(a)(2): 'In aid of the judgment or execution, the judgment creditor or a successor in interest whose interest appears of record may obtain discovery from any person – including the judgment debtor – as provided in these rules or in the procedure of the state where the court is located.' For explanation, see Wright et al. (2014) sections 3011–15.

  29. 29.

    Indeed, there is even a provision permitting enforcement of a judgment against a nonparty in unusual circumstances. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 71.

  30. 30.

    Republic of Argentina v. NML Capital, Ltd., 134 S.Ct. 2250, 2254 (2014).

  31. 31.

    Id. at 2256–57. It should be noted that Argentina had waived sovereign immunity more generally in connection with this dispute about bonds it had issued but failed to pay.

  32. 32.

    28 U.S.C. section 1782(a).

  33. 33.

    For discussion of this statute, see Wright et al. (2010) section 2005.1.

  34. 34.

    Office Depot, Inc. v. Zuccarini, 596 F.3d 696 (9th Cir. 2010).

  35. 35.

    See text accompanying note 1 above.

  36. 36.

    See, e.g., Clark v. Associates Commercial Prop., 149 F.R.D. 629 (D. Kan. 1991) (suit against lender for injuries sustained in repossession of a tractor).

  37. 37.

    15 U.S.C.  sections 1692–1692(b).

  38. 38.

    15 U.S.C. section 1692d(2).

  39. 39.

    Silver-Greenberg (2012).

  40. 40.

    See Silver-Greenberg (2011).

References

  • Andrews (2019) Developments in english civil justice: judicial proceedings and other civil processes. ZZPInt 2018:1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger (1978) Away from the courthouse and into the field: the odyssey of a special master. C Law Rev 78:707–732

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckholtz,, Cooper, Gettner, Guggenheimer (1978) The remedial process in institutional reform litigation. C Law Rev 78:784-929

    Google Scholar 

  • Dayen (2018) Prosecutors and judges have brought back debtors’ prison. Nation Magazine

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbs (1971) Contempt of court: a survey. Cornell Law Rev 56:183–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbs D (1973) Remedies, 1st edn. West Publications & Co., St. Paul

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess (2020), The effective disclosure of the debtor's assets in enforcement proceedings, in this volume

    Google Scholar 

  • Jerjian (2017) The debtors’ prison scheme: yet another bar in the birdcage of mass incarceration of communities of color. NYU Rev of Law & Soc Change 41:235–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Laycock (1990) The irreparable injury rule. Harv Law Rev 103:687–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheimer (1993) Martin Luther King, Walker v. City of Birmingham, and the letter from the Birmingham jail. UC Davis Law Rev 26:791–834

    Google Scholar 

  • Rechberger (2020) Clarification of facts in Austrian enforcement law, in this volume

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver-Greenberg (2012) In prosecutors, debt collectors find a partner, NY times

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver-Greenberg (2011) Debtor arrests criticized. Wall St J

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterngold (1992) Japan's rigged Casino, NY times

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright C, Miller A, Marcus R (2010) 8 Federal practice & procedure, 3rd edn. Thomson Reuters, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright C, Miller A, Marcus R (2014) 12 Federal practice & procedure, 3rd edn. Thomson Reuters, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahorky (2011) In the judgment trade: law student's website helps bring in the cash. ABA J 33

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Marcus .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Marcus, R. (2022). America's BYO Approach to Enforcing Money Judgments. In: Deguchi, M. (eds) Effective Enforcement of Creditors’ Rights. Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, vol 91. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5609-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5609-5_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-5608-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-5609-5

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics