Abstract
As to the question of who can and should provide factual and evidentiary material about the debtor’s assets for the purpose of enforcement activities by enforcement bodies, different systems give different answers. Complete and full knowledge of the debtor’s assets facilitates the choice of the most efficient and at the same time proportionate and appropriate enforcement measure, and it permits a coordination of several parallel measures. Each legal system has to balance the creditors’ right to an efficient enforcement with the debtors’ right to adequate data protection. However, full disclosure is a serious intrusion on the debtor’s private or business sphere.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Stürner (2016), p. 6.
- 2.
Stürner (2016), p. 6.
- 3.
Stürner (2016), p. 6.
- 4.
Alsfasser (2018), p. 5–25.
- 5.
Stürner (2016), p. 6.
- 6.
If it is appropriate, discuss the clarification of facts and proof of execution, where there is opposition or third parties involved, or third parties assert the limited number of remedies made. If enforcement is possible even in the cases where the evidence is necessary to clarify the allegations, the factual scope of discussion is already very limited. Capponi (2001), p. 28.
- 7.
Stürner (1981), p. 1757, 1760.
- 8.
Leroy (2000), p. 273.
- 9.
Alsfasser (2018), p. 20–30.
- 10.
Kengyel (2014), p. 1–14.
- 11.
See case JST BTA Bank v. Solodchenko (no2) 2011 in (2011) EWHC 2163 (Ch).
- 12.
Holzapfel (2008), p. 30–45.
- 13.
For example, the provisions of Directive 95/46/EC.
- 14.
Cf. Kengyel (2014), 1–14.
- 15.
For a comparative and general overview see Lupoi (2012), p. 181.
- 16.
Krings (2000), p. 221.
- 17.
Verbeke (2001), p. 7.
- 18.
Stürner (2010), p. 285.
- 19.
Crivelli (2012), p. 25.
- 20.
Cf. Super (2013), p. 1773–1780.
- 21.
Vollkommer (1982), p. 1–9.
- 22.
Tarzia (2002), p. 329.
- 23.
Baer (2009), p. 417–468.
References
Alsfasser A (2018) Sachaufklärung in der Einzelzwangsvollstreckung. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen
Baer S (2009) Dignity, liberty, equality: a fundamental rights triangle of constitutionalism. Univ Tor Law J 59(4):417–468
Capponi B (2001) Alcuni problemi sul contraddittorio e processo esecutivo (alla luce del nuovo art. Ili della Costituzione). Riv Esec Forz 1:28. (et seq)
Crivelli A (2012) (2012) La natura e le fonti dell’essecuzione forzata. In: Crivelli A (ed) Esecuzione forzata e processo esecutivo. Utet, Torino, pp 25–51
Holzapfel C (2008) Sachaufklärung und Zwangsvollstreckung in Europa. Nomos, Berlin
Kengyel M (2014) Transparency of assets and enforcement. Unif L Rev 1–14
Krings E (2000) Le delai raisonnable a la lumiere de la jurisprudence de la Cour de Strasbourg. Vers un droit substantiel a I’execution des decisions de justice. in L’efficacité de la justice civile en europe. Larcier, Brussels 2000:221–245
Leroy É (2000) L’efficacité des procédures judiciaires au sein de l’union Européenne et les garanties des droits de la défense. In: de Leval-MT Caupain (ed) Europe G Transparence patrimoniale, L’efficacité de la justice civile. Litec, Bruxelles, pp. 273–402.
Lupoi M (2012) Enforcement of a claim with the support of the new information technology. In: Nemessányi KM (ed) Protection of the creditor and the debtor. Electronic Technology and Civil Procedure. Springer, Dordrecht, p 181
Stürner M (2010) Der Grundsatz der Verhältnissmässigkeit im Schuldvertragsrecht. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen
Stürner R (1981) Strafrechtliche Selbstbelastung und verfahrensförmige Wahrheitsermittlung. Neue Juristische Wochenschrift (NJW) 1757:1760
Stürner R (2016) Principles of effective enforcement feasibility study. UNIDROIT 2016 C.D. (95) 13 Add. 2 Original. https://www.unidroit.org/english/governments/councildocuments/2016session/cd-95-13add-02-e.pdf
Super DA (2013) A new property. C Law Rev 113(7):1773–1896
Tarzia G (2002) Il giusto processo di esecuzione. Riv Dir Proc 329. (et seq)
Verbeke A (2001) Execution officers as a balance wheel in insolvency cases. TFLR-Civ Law 7. (et seq)
Vollkommer M (1982) Verfassungsmäßigkeit des Vollstreckungszugriffs. Rpfleger 1–9
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ragone, Á.P. (2022). Comments on Information Concerning the Debtor’s Assets for the Enforcement Proceeding. In: Deguchi, M. (eds) Effective Enforcement of Creditors’ Rights. Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, vol 91. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5609-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5609-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-5608-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-5609-5
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)